Author Topic: Sniper Stewart given 4 weeks [update]  (Read 15090 times)

Offline Knighter

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2744
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #45 on: June 26, 2022, 07:20:21 PM »
Manifestly inadequate Brad Scott u stuffen campaigner

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #46 on: June 26, 2022, 07:21:16 PM »
I’m confused, his intention was to bump then shouldn’t it be deemed intentional?

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #47 on: June 26, 2022, 07:29:48 PM »
Careless loool no way near the ball went for the man clowns running our game.

Online HKTigerB

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 44
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #48 on: June 26, 2022, 07:32:03 PM »
It got re-worded within 5 mins.  Initially said "intentional ..... 4 weeks"  5 mins later re-published as "careless .... 3 weeks"

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2443
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #49 on: June 26, 2022, 07:52:13 PM »
Scott says he was so upset but goes onto be best in ground. Most people who are upset are off their game and not so focussed.
I call bs and he was in fact proud to help his side win, I’m saying Due to height (Prestia head = Steward shoulder) it could  only be intentional

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #50 on: June 26, 2022, 08:06:20 PM »
Scott says he was so upset but goes onto be best in ground. Most people who are upset are off their game and not so focussed.
I call bs and he was in fact proud to help his side win, I’m saying Due to height (Prestia head = Steward shoulder) it could  only be intentional

Yep I think it was part of their game plan to take him out

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #51 on: June 26, 2022, 08:09:30 PM »
re-worded? Is that some kind farkin joke? Would love it if someone can post that adjustment the cheats made?

Its an intentional act, not stuffin careless. To think otherwise is just buttering the tribunal up.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #52 on: June 26, 2022, 08:11:26 PM »
He actually leapt up into the air to hit him he already towers over him he knew what he was doing
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8095
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #53 on: June 26, 2022, 08:12:49 PM »
The minute you leave the ground I thought it automatically went to intentional because what else are you trying to do?
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Online JP Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1562
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #54 on: June 26, 2022, 09:36:01 PM »
The media beat up on this incident is pretty disgraceful.  All we need is a picture of Stewart with a hang-dog expression on his face while the MRO declares that Tom has learned his lesson & should be let off.  In fact, lets get him a present! 
Poor old Tom is the real victim here (despite Dion being the one to actually have his head caved in) so its expected that 'Good ole Tom' should walk away Scott free.  (Good term that one, Scott free!)
If Toby Greene did the same thing the whole football world would demand 12 weeks & de-registration ... minimum!
So why is Tom Stewart being seen to be such a good bloke & getting his charge reduced to a lesser charge?     :huh
Once a Tiger, always a Tiger!  Loud, proud & dangerous!

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #55 on: June 26, 2022, 10:01:48 PM »
Very confusing and inconsistent.

Pat Ryder got 2 weeks for standing his ground. I'd grade that as careless. At the absolute very worst, Stewart act was reckless. He chose to bump, I'm baffled as to how this wasn't intentional. Or what is deemed as intentional.

Regardless, it's at the tribunal where surely common sense prevails, and he gets 4 +weeks.
Go Tigers!

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #56 on: June 26, 2022, 10:21:48 PM »
Pathetic from the MRO  ::). It's not "careless" when a player deliberately runs past the ball and knocks out an opponent off the ball. It's an intentional dog act >:(.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9974
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #57 on: June 26, 2022, 10:50:50 PM »
How can this not be at least reckless? I was thinking intentional or at least reckless.

Cats clearly wanted to take him out and it's disgusting.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40312
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Sniper Stewart - how many weeks? / Sent to the Tribunal [update]
« Reply #58 on: June 26, 2022, 11:03:11 PM »
How can this not be at least reckless? I was thinking intentional or at least reckless.

Cats clearly wanted to take him out and it's disgusting.

Reckless is no longer a grading
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)