Author Topic: Richmond's trade period rating?  (Read 3090 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95459
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Richmond's trade period rating?
« on: October 19, 2023, 04:40:37 AM »
From the HeraldSun:

Richmond Tigers

IN: Jacob Koschitzke (Hawthorn)

OUT: Ivan Soldo (Port Adelaide), Bigoa Nyuon (North Melbourne)

PICKS: 29, 41, 65, 68

After Jack Riewoldt’s retirement and with a lingering injury cloud over Tom Lynch, the Tigers needed to add another key forward to their list and did that with Kochitzke. He is a 196cm forward who at 23 years old is still developing but has shown promise. Richmond didn’t want to lose Soldo, but eventually budged on the ruckman and let him have his wish to join Port Adelaide in a deal that boosted the Tigers’ draft hand both this year and next year and was ultimately too good to ignore. There could be issues if co-captain Toby Nankerivs is wiped out by injury or suspension next year, though.

Expert Rating (Chris Cavanagh): 6

-----------------------

Sydney       9.5
Collingwood 9
Essendon    9
Port Adel.    8.5
North Melb. 8
W.Bulldogs  8
Brisbane     7.5
Carlton       7
Hawthorn    7
Adelaide      6.5
St Kilda       6.5
Geelong      6
Richmond    6
West Coast  6
Gold Coast   5
GWS Giants 5
Melbourne   5
Fremantle   4

https://www.codesports.com.au/afl/afl-trade-period-2023-every-clubs-ins-outs-and-rating/news-story/884f669503803f5a7b821e64914544db

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95459
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2023, 04:46:19 AM »
From The Age:

14. Richmond

In: Jacob Koschitzke (Hawthorn/trade), picks 41, 65 and future second-round (Fremantle) and fourth-round (Port Adelaide) picks.

Out: Bigoa Nyuon (North Melbourne/trade), Ivan Soldo (Port Adelaide/trade), pick 50.

Draft picks: 29, 41, 65, 68, 86

Trade grade: C+

Eventually decided to trade Soldo to Port Adelaide for a reasonable price but were otherwise quiet having been big players last season when they recruited midfielders Taranto and Hopper. With a new coach, the list is in transition, but they still remain contenders if Tom Lynch is fit, adding Koschitzke in support.

- Peter Ryan

-----

1. Sydney        A
2. Gold Coast   A
3. Port Adel.    B+
4. Essendon     B
5. Collingwood B
6. St Kilda       B
7. Hawthorn    B
8. Brisbane     B-
9. Melbourne   B-
10. North Melb B-
11. W.Bulldogs  B-
12. Adelaide     C+
13. Carlton       C+
14. Richmond   C+
15. West Coast  C
16. Geelong      C-
17. GWS Giants D
18. Fremantle    D-

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/only-two-as-who-dominated-the-afl-s-swap-fest-and-who-were-the-big-losers-20231016-p5eco1.html

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95459
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2023, 04:47:40 AM »
Have Richmond done well with limited resources in this trade period?

Watch here: https://twitter.com/traderadio/status/1714578314726166907

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8921
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #3 on: October 19, 2023, 06:55:45 AM »
Should have tried to move on Graham and Ralph but I thought we did well in the trades we executed.

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3445
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #4 on: October 19, 2023, 08:55:51 AM »
You never know how a new coach can inspire some players…🙏🙏

Online pmac21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4456
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #5 on: October 19, 2023, 09:45:04 AM »
You get points for just being active in the trade period, whether the players in or out are duds.

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8921
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #6 on: October 19, 2023, 10:41:12 AM »
You get points for just being active in the trade period, whether the players in or out are duds.

Yep.

It's like a competition who can trade the most in or out.

Bollocks

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4654
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #7 on: October 19, 2023, 01:26:35 PM »
Didn’t we win last years 😂😂
Unleash the tornado

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7576
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #8 on: October 19, 2023, 02:29:09 PM »
Should have tried to move on Graham and Ralph but I thought we did well in the trades we executed.

They are merely depth players. Too much time is spent on them, we know what they deliver and it more than likely won’t cut it in our best 22.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95459
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #9 on: October 19, 2023, 02:32:38 PM »
David King, Leigh Montagna, Sarah Jones and Jon Ralph's review of our trade period and list on Fox Footy:

Watch here: https://twitter.com/TroutWoodend/status/1714573843321491768

Offline Jonesracing82

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 358
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2023, 11:49:04 PM »
Didn’t we win last years 😂😂
According to the media the Cats did, they went from Premiers to missing the 8. Being trade premiers very rarely = onfield success, just ask the bombers

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95459
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #11 on: October 20, 2023, 01:49:35 PM »
Tom Morris rates our trade period the worst.


18 – Richmond

“I think the team that has performed the worst in this off-season so far is Richmond.

“I don't think they've done enough. Yes, they got a future second-rounder for Ivan Soldo.

“But I think for a team that should be regenerating on the run, they should have done more.”

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2023/10/19/tom-morris-trade-period-ladder-ranking-every-clubs-performance-from-1-to-18/

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2804
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #12 on: October 20, 2023, 05:22:44 PM »
I don’t believe in doing trades for the sake of it. Like Essendon always “wins” trade period but where are they now? Like on proven A grade talent for me grundy was the only name and that came with a price tag and not to mention he wanted to go to Sydney anyway.

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8921
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #13 on: October 20, 2023, 06:34:16 PM »
Only thing that would be better for me is trading out graham for another R2 this year and Ralph for a fun size pack of skittles

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7576
Re: Richmond's trade period rating?
« Reply #14 on: October 20, 2023, 06:47:24 PM »
Tom Morris rates our trade period the worst.


18 – Richmond

“I think the team that has performed the worst in this off-season so far is Richmond.

“I don't think they've done enough. Yes, they got a future second-rounder for Ivan Soldo.

“But I think for a team that should be regenerating on the run, they should have done more.”

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2023/10/19/tom-morris-trade-period-ladder-ranking-every-clubs-performance-from-1-to-18/

As opposed to the Cats who did one rubbish trade. Their list is older, slower and showing far more signs of fatigue than ours
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.