Author Topic: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024  (Read 36025 times)

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13924
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #495 on: Yesterday at 06:58:31 AM »
Thoughts on Matt Kennedy.?

I don't even know if he is a fa but he is a lot better than Graham.

Wouldn't hurt for a few years
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40016
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #496 on: Yesterday at 07:11:02 AM »
Thoughts on Matt Kennedy.?

I don't even know if he is a fa but he is a lot better than Graham.

Wouldn't hurt for a few years

He's not FA, he's contracted for 2025.

Would need to be traded.
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline crackertiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 765
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #497 on: Yesterday at 07:31:30 AM »
No to Kennedy

Offline yandb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 744
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #498 on: Yesterday at 01:34:57 PM »
We don't have a lot of positions on our list as we are two spots over due to long term injuries.

Picking up recycled players will only reduce spots for draft picks.

Just hit the draft this year.

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #499 on: Yesterday at 03:27:52 PM »
He’s another slow midfielder, you’d be replacing graham for a similar type.

No recycled mids are required. We’re gonna draft 2-3 in this coming draft who will be supported by the likes of Taranto, hopper and Prestia.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19079
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #500 on: Yesterday at 03:36:03 PM »
We already have a midfielder with AFL experience that's arguably of similar quality to Kennedy in the perfect age bracket on our VFL list in Garner that we could easily rookie and who would cost us nothing... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13924
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #501 on: Yesterday at 06:10:43 PM »
Thoughts on Matt Kennedy.?

I don't even know if he is a fa but he is a lot better than Graham.

Wouldn't hurt for a few years

He's not FA, he's contracted for 2025.

Would need to be traded.

then that answers my question. Pass.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5488
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #502 on: Yesterday at 07:17:23 PM »
Hard no on Kennedy. Hard hard no.

Is a lost clogger, may help us win 1-2 games then otherwise wouldn't and cost us draft order. Will take game time and centre bounces away from a McAullife or Sonsie.

Hard no.
Go Tigers!

Offline Hart4Jack

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #503 on: Yesterday at 08:16:55 PM »
Hard no on Kennedy. Hard hard no.

Is a lost clogger, may help us win 1-2 games then otherwise wouldn't and cost us draft order. Will take game time and centre bounces away from a McAullife or Sonsie.

Hard no.


Is that a no,  are you sure?   :lol 

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19079
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #504 on: Yesterday at 09:13:11 PM »
Hard no on Kennedy. Hard hard no.

Is a lost clogger, may help us win 1-2 games then otherwise wouldn't and cost us draft order. Will take game time and centre bounces away from a McAullife or Sonsie.

Hard no.


Is that a no,  are you sure?   :lol

Hardly... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7924
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #505 on: Yesterday at 09:32:05 PM »
There’s no way he’d come here even if we would want him. Save it until 2027. :shh
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #506 on: Yesterday at 09:42:16 PM »
There’s no way he’d come here even if we would want him. Save it until 2027. :shh

Who? Kennedy? He’ll go to whatever club wants him, blues want him out.

Offline taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2047
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #507 on: Yesterday at 10:02:02 PM »
Thoughts on Matt Kennedy.?

I don't even know if he is a fa but he is a lot better than Graham.

Wouldn't hurt for a few years

we bid on him (and Hipwood) before we settled on Daniel , but no thx