The richest, most powerful Tigers supporters. But you wouldn’t know it (Age)

[Damo]

Not one wog amongst them

Is that good or bad

I didn’t realise there had to be a European quota filled

there is a woman quota and an indigenous quota

Certainly a lawyer quota

Why would there not be a non anglo quota ? Especially considering alot of  our members are non anglo

Not sure how you've come to the conclusion about there being quotas

Shouldn't it always be about making sure it is the best people for the job, not quotas 

Exactly what I think WP

If there needs to be a wog

Then maybe there needs to be an Indian
Of course we need a Chinese

For goodness sakes , of course we need someone representing South East Asia

And so on

To me , the wog comment was stuffing ridiculous

Do you think adding woman is ridiculous?

What about adding indigenous Australians ?

DO you think that is ridiculous ?

SO why one and not the other ?

Why are you discriminating ?

Yes. I think it’s ridiculous full stop!

Just like the woman quota commentators

I believe the best qualified people for the board should make up the board

If that’s entirely woman, fine. If that’s a board entirely indigenous fine. Entirely Europeans, fine.

Couldn’t care where they come from.

If the best qualified people are Anglo Saxon Aussie males aged between 35-60, then they should make up the board.

I hate modern day quotas.


And lastly, if anyone was discriminating, it was you.

so you reckon it is just a coincidence that there are 5 woman and 1 indigenous australian on the board ?

I don't . I think they said we need 5 women, and 1 indigenous Australian.

And they picked, the best 5 women, and the best indigenous Australian

This by definition is a quota

What do you think? If you think that they are the best 12 people, and they just happen to include 5 women and 1 indigenous Australian, you are in la la land

Let me dumb it down like the doctor tinkering with Homer's ticker.

YES I THINK THERE IS A QUOTA ON THE BOARD
YES I THINK IT'S RIDICULOUS
LIKE QUOTA COMMENTATORS IS RIDICULOUS
I BELIEVE BOARD POSITIONS SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE BEST APPLICANTS, REGARDLESS OF GENDER, COLOUR OR NATIONALITY

You mentioned about wogs, to which I said I didn't realise there was a European quota to fill.

If you start along that line, where does it stop?

That is a fair question isn't it?

Not an African, Chinese, Indian, South East Asian, Furry, transgender, poofter etc etc

QUOTA'S ARE RIDICULOUS AND SHOULDN'T EXIST

2025 Australia is a PC nanny state joke. I've made my thoughts on this known many times.

[blaisee]

Not one wog amongst them

Is that good or bad

I didn’t realise there had to be a European quota filled

there is a woman quota and an indigenous quota

Certainly a lawyer quota

Why would there not be a non anglo quota ? Especially considering alot of  our members are non anglo

Not sure how you've come to the conclusion about there being quotas

Shouldn't it always be about making sure it is the best people for the job, not quotas 

Exactly what I think WP

If there needs to be a wog

Then maybe there needs to be an Indian
Of course we need a Chinese

For goodness sakes , of course we need someone representing South East Asia

And so on

To me , the wog comment was stuffing ridiculous

Do you think adding woman is ridiculous?

What about adding indigenous Australians ?

DO you think that is ridiculous ?

SO why one and not the other ?

Why are you discriminating ?

Yes. I think it’s ridiculous full stop!

Just like the woman quota commentators

I believe the best qualified people for the board should make up the board

If that’s entirely woman, fine. If that’s a board entirely indigenous fine. Entirely Europeans, fine.

Couldn’t care where they come from.

If the best qualified people are Anglo Saxon Aussie males aged between 35-60, then they should make up the board.

I hate modern day quotas.


And lastly, if anyone was discriminating, it was you.

so you reckon it is just a coincidence that there are 5 woman and 1 indigenous australian on the board ?

I don't . I think they said we need 5 women, and 1 indigenous Australian.

And they picked, the best 5 women, and the best indigenous Australian

This by definition is a quota

What do you think? If you think that they are the best 12 people, and they just happen to include 5 women and 1 indigenous Australian, you are in la la land

Let me dumb it down like the doctor tinkering with Homer's ticker.

YES I THINK THERE IS A QUOTA ON THE BOARD
YES I THINK IT'S RIDICULOUS
LIKE QUOTA COMMENTATORS IS RIDICULOUS
I BELIEVE BOARD POSITIONS SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE BEST APPLICANTS, REGARDLESS OF GENDER, COLOUR OR NATIONALITY

You mentioned about wogs, to which I said I didn't realise there was a European quota to fill.

If you start along that line, where does it stop?

That is a fair question isn't it?

Not an African, Chinese, Indian, South East Asian, Furry, transgender, poofter etc etc

QUOTA'S ARE RIDICULOUS AND SHOULDN'T EXIST

2025 Australia is a PC nanny state joke. I've made my thoughts on this known many times.

Well I did not set the quota did I? The RFC did ?

Ask them where to draw the line, not me

When they open the door to this garbage, it cannot be closed, which is actually my point actually

They have discrimated for a group of people, which by definition means they have discriminated against others

This is the problem, our club can't even say Merry Christmas any more

[Damo]

This is the problem, our club can't even say Merry Christmas any more

Another disgraceful situation

[WilliamPowell]

You have to be joking surely

You don't think the RFC board has an indigenous quota and a womans quota ?

Surely you jest ?

You reckon those people on the board are the best people for the job, and some of them being woman, and indigenous had no impact on there selection? It did not help them get the job ?, not saying they are useless, but there sex and and ethnicity helped them get the job, over and above their particular skills

You could not possibly believe that, no way on earth could anyway believe that

No I don't think there's an indigenous quota. I think having a bloke who's been heavily involved in the KGI which is one of the Club's most important programs and has the necessary contacts is smart busoness

I am aware that the Club has said they'd like at least half the board to be women but I have heard them say it was set in stone.

I think that having 2 people on the board who have experience either running elite sporting competitions or being on the board of other sporting bodies is a good thing. The fact that the 2 Directors in question are women is irrelevant. Would also think having a person who was involved in developing 3-0-75 plan on the board is smart as they've proven they have the skill set required for strategic planning again gender should have no bearing

As I keep saying it is about getting the best people, gender is irrelevant.

Please enlighten me about the lawyer quota, seriously have no doea how you came up with that.

[blaisee]

You have to be joking surely

You don't think the RFC board has an indigenous quota and a womans quota ?

Surely you jest ?

You reckon those people on the board are the best people for the job, and some of them being woman, and indigenous had no impact on there selection? It did not help them get the job ?, not saying they are useless, but there sex and and ethnicity helped them get the job, over and above their particular skills

You could not possibly believe that, no way on earth could anyway believe that

No I don't think there's an indigenous quota. I think having a bloke who's been heavily involved in the KGI which is one of the Club's most important programs and has the necessary contacts is smart busoness

I am aware that the Club has said they'd like at least half the board to be women but I have heard them say it was set in stone.

I think that having 2 people on the board who have experience either running elite sporting competitions or being on the board of other sporting bodies is a good thing. The fact that the 2 Directors in question are women is irrelevant. Would also think having a person who was involved in developing 3-0-75 plan on the board is smart as they've proven they have the skill set required for strategic planning again gender should have no bearing

As I keep saying it is about getting the best people, gender is irrelevant.

Please enlighten me about the lawyer quota, seriously have no doea how you came up with that.

Please answer the question asked

You reckon those people on the board are the best people for the job, and some of them being woman, and indigenous had no impact on there selection? It did not help them get the job ?, not saying they are useless, but there sex and and ethnicity helped them get the job, over and above their particular skills

[Hard Roar Tiger]

You answered your own questions so what’s the point?

[WilliamPowell]

Please answer the question asked

You reckon those people on the board are the best people for the job, and some of them being woman, and indigenous had no impact on there selection? It did not help them get the job ?, not saying they are useless, but there sex and and ethnicity helped them get the job, over and above their particular skills

Funny I thought I did, the question was around quotas wasnt it? I answered that

You now seem to be asking a different question 

[blaisee]

Please answer the question asked

You reckon those people on the board are the best people for the job, and some of them being woman, and indigenous had no impact on there selection? It did not help them get the job ?, not saying they are useless, but there sex and and ethnicity helped them get the job, over and above their particular skills

Funny I thought I did, the question was around quotas wasnt it? I answered that

You now seem to be asking a different question 

Nice deflection, you should be in politics

[WilliamPowell]

Please answer the question asked

You reckon those people on the board are the best people for the job, and some of them being woman, and indigenous had no impact on there selection? It did not help them get the job ?, not saying they are useless, but there sex and and ethnicity helped them get the job, over and above their particular skills

Funny I thought I did, the question was around quotas wasnt it? I answered that

You now seem to be asking a different question 

Nice deflection, you should be in politics

No deflection

Your question was do I think there are quotas

I answered NO, I don't believe there is

Then after answering you appear to ask a totally different question as to whether the current board members are the best people for the job?

Which you would appear to you they aren't not based on their skill set but based on their gender and being indigenous or to a some mysterious "lawyer" quota