Author Topic: Rookie Draft  (Read 1894 times)

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2632
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #60 on: November 21, 2025, 11:26:10 PM »
I watched a bit of him and thought he was worth a late spot on our list, but it’s not our call
.i thought he showed more than some that we kept on the current list.
 .
It would appear he wasn’t earmarked full stop as there was no one who they though was a better player in the rookie draft or the would have picked them but they have chosen to look and see if someone steps up somewhere .

I don’t think they should have listed Kellaway as a father son pick if they had no intention of picking him, I guess players can also opt out of being nominated as a father son to give themselves more chance of being picked.


Offline Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5221
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #61 on: November 21, 2025, 11:58:47 PM »
Doesn’t stop any other club bidding on him

If we didn’t nominate him, it’s clear as day he wouldn’t have got drafted

No other team was interested

If his last name was Ming it wouldn’t even be a discussion

Online Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5352
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #62 on: November 22, 2025, 12:07:10 AM »
Also bear in mind we traded back into the draft to get NRT. I’m assuming that move was decided late on the night when the team saw him sliding further than what they expected. It’s possible that if that hadn’t happened with an extra spot on our list, they would have indeed rookied Louie.

I’m fairly certain as Geischan stated many times they had various convos with the kellaway fam throughout the year and were open and honest with them with their intentions. Probably something along the lines of we like you as a player and would like to select you however we can’t garauntee that as we are right for list spots so we’ll just have to see on the day.

I’m sure the boy and fam are disappointed but hopefully he puts his head down and gets onto a list whether that’s with us or elsewhere.

The traditionalist in me would have liked to seen us pick him, but I don’t think you can fault the club for passing if they have other players they rate ahead of him.

Offline Dogga

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #63 on: November 22, 2025, 07:11:32 AM »
A lot of people upset in tigers land but I don't mind it.


NHH
Oudshoorn-Bennier
Tom McGuane
Tom Burton
Rory Wright

Etc. can be invited to train for the last spot.

Harsh and not very romantic to kellaway but ruthless and bold by the club.

Like others have said he is objectively not good enough at this stage unfortunately. Proven by being passed on by the league in two drafts.

I know that Tom Burton has been invited to train with us.

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5382
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #64 on: November 22, 2025, 07:53:38 AM »
A lot of people upset in tigers land but I don't mind it.


NHH
Oudshoorn-Bennier
Tom McGuane
Tom Burton
Rory Wright

Etc. can be invited to train for the last spot.

Harsh and not very romantic to kellaway but ruthless and bold by the club.

Like others have said he is objectively not good enough at this stage unfortunately. Proven by being passed on by the league in two drafts.

I know that Tom Burton has been invited to train with us.

who else?

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 102065
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #65 on: November 22, 2025, 12:32:15 PM »
Club's view:

"Richmond now has the flexibility to make an addition to its list through the SSP over the summer or to hold the spot through for the Mid Season Rookie Draft."

https://x.com/Richmond_FC/status/1991721413758316743

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11340
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #66 on: November 22, 2025, 05:24:11 PM »
Any chance we'll use ssp on LK?

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59864
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #67 on: November 22, 2025, 06:43:58 PM »
Any chance we'll use ssp on LK?
We could. It depends on whether we get him down to train with us over the summer. IIRC sometime in March is the cut-off for the SSP.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4458
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #68 on: Yesterday at 12:40:27 PM »
We would have seen plenty of Kellaway being a F/S. We would have also seen plenty of NR-T being in the same team. Clearly we rated NRT higher.

We still have a rookie spot available he can come down and show us what he has to offer and make that spot his.
We still need more mids.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4458
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #69 on: Yesterday at 07:06:34 PM »
Meant to add if people think Kellaway is a bit stiff i reckon Harry Scott is as well.
If he goes gang busters again next year he may well be another snatched from under our noses.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 102065
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #70 on: Yesterday at 07:22:18 PM »
Why Richmond overlooked father-son prospect Louis Kellaway

Richmond left father-son prospect Louis Kellaway in the lurch — and won’t be offering a train-on spot. Here’s why.

Jon Ralph
HeraldSun
November 23, 2025


Richmond has told overlooked father-son Louis Kellaway he will not be a contender for its single summer rookie position.

Duncan Kellaway’s son Louis put in an impressive campaign for Sturt and South Australia’s Under-18 side but Richmond eventually overlooked him, unsure where he would play in their new-look side in coming years.

“We worked really closely with Louis over three years. He spent time at the club,” Rhy Gieschen said.

“We feel like our communication through that period and as the draft got closer was really good, we kept him in the loop as to where we sat and we had the option to put him on our rookie list but wanted to keep the option over for SSP or leave it open for the mid-season draft. We decided to do that.

“It’s always a difficult decision but Louey and Duncan were in the loop with what we were doing and it was a tough decision but we felt like we did the right thing by him and the family to communicate.”

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/why-richmond-overlooked-fatherson-prospect-louis-kellaway-amid-speed-focus-in-draft-bonanza/news-story/c34094f79646e4e91727cd4523357d6b#selection-871.0-889.202

Offline ajGreen

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 599
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #71 on: Yesterday at 07:40:48 PM »
Not even invited to train for the spot? Dang

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11340
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #72 on: Yesterday at 08:05:30 PM »
Simple, they don't like him. Eek