I'll take that as a no then?
why is it you feel that your statements, made with such conviction, cannot be held up to question?
i believe this nonsense started on the
How did you rate our 2013 season thread. It was then bought over here to this thread. i suggest anyone who wants to see what this about go over there and have a look i stand by everything ive said.
i reckon on both threads ive answeerd all questions. explained how simple it is to cut 8 - 10 with examples. nowhere have i said every pick will be an upgrade or should be an upgrade those unrealistic words are yours and yeahrights.
after some comments i made yeahright asked how do you cut 8-10 players and upgrade on them all.
to which at the start of my reply i said , at the end of the day duds are duds.
making an attempt to get better players and failing is better than doing nothing. i reckon few comments have summed up better exactly where i was coming from. yet they are ignored.
im not the one who has had the unrealistic and down right silly notion that every pick and player we take will be an upgrade.
but i do think a good process would be for us to cut the players ive mentioned and go thru a similar procees as ive suggested how many times now.
ive been asked a similar question 3 times now on two threads and every time i have replied on what we can do. ive had the decency to reply and actually read and try to take in the whole of whats been said. i cant say that for others.
for those who have a mind go over to that thread and see who has got his knickers in a knot and whos been unreasonable.
ffs i want us to use 4 nd picks how can i say any of those picks will be upgrades. i want us to use 4 nd picks as a minimum every yr. i do this knowing one or two are likely to fail. thats the nature of the nd. every club does similar.
.
i want us to cut 3 rookies maybe 4 depending. if we cant bring in better skilled rookies than lonergan, verrier, and petterd and if we get a decent 2nd ruck stephenson, we should just quit. will the players be upgrades who is to say. if they have better skills and better physical attributes and have performed they will be a better chance of becoming afl standard players.
i also hope we do 1 trade one or two f/a or maybe a psd if we do one f/a. ive mentioned chapman jolly laidler for starters. replacing nahas derickx mcguane, white gone to port tuck retired theres 5 alreaqdy gone.
all ican say is ive kindly answered your questions every time and you refuse acknowledge what has been said instead focusing on what you want me to say.
i will say again i am not the one insisting every pick or player we use will be an upgrade. i will argue though when we have so many below standard players it is indeed better to try new players and maybe even fail with a few than hang onto players who dont even have a basic skill set to play afl.
now ive answered again im over the nit picking or the selective choosing of parts of posts now stuff of.
