Author Topic: Daniel Connors [merged]  (Read 66530 times)

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #195 on: April 04, 2010, 08:56:37 PM »
was his best game tonight, did really well, looked composed, was brave and used it well...need another 4 of him
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #196 on: April 04, 2010, 08:57:46 PM »
was his best game tonight, did really well, looked composed, was brave and used it well...need another 4 of him

Yeah right, gave the opposition 3 goals :banghead

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #197 on: April 04, 2010, 08:58:03 PM »
I'll be glad when nathan f gets back into this team and people like astbury and griffiths are given a run

Offline tiger till i die

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 786
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #198 on: April 04, 2010, 08:59:03 PM »
thank the footy Gods :bow :bow ... i want too see him in a gym and pumping iron to become a Unit and work on his Kicking

Offline peggles

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #199 on: April 04, 2010, 09:00:07 PM »
I'll be glad when nathan f gets back into this team and people like astbury and griffiths are given a run

that and get simmo out of the team. completely useless, can't run, cant mark, cant pick up ground balls, cant win hitouts....why the hell is he even playing

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #200 on: April 04, 2010, 09:00:36 PM »
I'll be glad when nathan f gets back into this team and people like astbury and griffiths are given a run

Totally agree

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #201 on: April 04, 2010, 09:52:16 PM »
As I said in a previous post on another thread would rather see a player make an error trying to make play than a player make a mistake by being restricting and conservative.

I thought he did okay. Was hard and tough and got to the footy okay. Yes Jack he made a couple of errors by foot but would rather see Daniel continue the way he plays.

Would hate to see him get dropped for those errors when blokes like Tambling get a game next week and play half ar$ed and live off the fact that they are a pick 4 draft pick.

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #202 on: April 04, 2010, 09:55:52 PM »
I actually like Connors.
Can win his own ball which is a positive.
Would play him inside F50, so his option by foot would be to try and kick goals.
His skill set doesnt lend itself to playing deep in D50.
Thought his turnovers were ordinary tonight

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8464
  • In Absentia
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #203 on: April 04, 2010, 09:58:39 PM »
I thinks Connors best work is done in congestion. The less he has to think about disposal the better he is, he has quick hands.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Online Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #204 on: April 04, 2010, 09:59:33 PM »
so Cono is alright ?  :pray
Bruised ribs they were saying on the radio.
Bruised or broken means little difference sometimes, he'll still need to miss a few i would think. Apparently he was spitting up blood and thats sounds a little like a punctured lung!

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #205 on: April 04, 2010, 10:00:12 PM »
I do too Jack. If you can't hit a target at this level 15 metres away.....
I agree with you mate but I like the way he goes about it.
Wins his own ball puts his body on the line and goes for it all the time.
In my opinion he has a place in our side moving forward as opposed to some others.
Needs to work on his right side however. Will eliminate him getting caught.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14052
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #206 on: April 04, 2010, 10:02:06 PM »
I actually like Connors.
Can win his own ball which is a positive.
Would play him inside F50, so his option by foot would be to try and kick goals.
His skill set doesnt lend itself to playing deep in D50.
Thought his turnovers were ordinary tonight

what other option do we really have in our back half. I would rather a goal post than to see Edwards in our D50.

I dont know what Hardwick is on to still play this guy in the team. He is useless.. As for Farmer well who knows about him too.

I thought Connors played well tonight but if it means we kick goals then he needs to be moved out of dedence
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98263
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #207 on: April 04, 2010, 10:04:16 PM »
so Cono is alright ?  :pray
Bruised ribs they were saying on the radio.
Bruised or broken means little difference sometimes, he'll still need to miss a few i would think. Apparently he was spitting up blood and thats sounds a little like a punctured lung!
:-\

Just repeating what was said on the radio. They said the Club expects Connors to be right to play by next week  :-\.

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5723
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #208 on: April 05, 2010, 01:27:27 AM »
Jack are you unhappy with Connors game?

The guy has improved out of sight in attitude and confidence.

You defend Simmo for having a crack for being a slow flop of a man. Yet you argue negatively towards the positives of Connors.

I'll fly to the moon with feathers if anyone thinks Simmonds game was better than Connors today.

Sure he made a few mistakes but ge name me 1 player that didn't turn the ball over today in the yellow and black.

Put his body on the line, took them on, kicking was ok apart from one clanger that resulted in a dogs goal.

Hats off for Connors for mine.
Go Tigers!

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40326
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #209 on: April 05, 2010, 07:26:45 AM »
I was very pleased with the improvement with Connors game this week

I thought for the 6 or 7 times he really needed to put his body on the line he did 3-4 times, which was a massive improvement from the week before

However, there were still a few occassions where he was playing to far off his opponent (about 3-5 metres) when the Dogs were surging forward and the Doggies used this to their advantage. His tunrovers were costly but hey compared to another player who I don't think had one effective kick all night (and I don't mean Edwards  ;D)

I reckon the poor kicks are a result of not knowing whether to go long or short

But all in all a much better effort

Personally I think it needs to become the norm and not the exception
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)