Jay Schulz [merged]

[{X}]

first round sounded way to good to be true

if miller trades pick 18 for morton, someone should pop his knee caps!

miller use ur head for once not ur ego

[mightytiges]

In all fairness we can't be shocked that Port hasn't offered pick 16 for Sarge. However pick 33 in a weak draft that will struggle to find good players past picks 25-30 isn't getting much in return.

In the 3-way deal we swapped Schulz for McMahon. Now that the Dogs have said they don't want Damon White, our trade is now Schulz + pick 18 for McMahon + pick 33. We've lost 15 spots in the draft in one day going from a 3-way deal to a 2-way deal  ???. 

[{X}]

In all fairness we can't be shocked that Port hasn't offered pick 16 for Sarge. However pick 33 in a weak draft that will struggle to find good players past picks 25-30 isn't getting much in return.

In the 3-way deal we swapped Schulz for McMahon. Now that the Dogs have said they don't want Damon White, our trade is now Schulz + pick 18 for McMahon + pick 33. We've lost 15 spots in the draft in one day going from a 3-way deal to a 2-way deal  ???. 

thats what miller means by the rfc being "active"

miller is a class opne d head, full of his own sh it, and as i said, he is out to destroy us.

btw, wasnt miller supposed to have taken a backward step through all this.

march may as well start packing his bags along with miller and the tanned salesmann

[tigersalive]

In all fairness we can't be shocked that Port hasn't offered pick 16 for Sarge. However pick 33 in a weak draft that will struggle to find good players past picks 25-30 isn't getting much in return.

In the 3-way deal we swapped Schulz for McMahon. Now that the Dogs have said they don't want Damon White, our trade is now Schulz + pick 18 for McMahon + pick 33. We've lost 15 spots in the draft in one day going from a 3-way deal to a 2-way deal  ???. 

thats what miller means by the rfc being "active"

miller is a class opne d head, full of his own sh it, and as i said, he is out to destroy us.

btw, wasnt miller supposed to have taken a backward step through all this.
march may as well start packing his bags along with miller and the tanned salesmann

No, thats in the draft, Francis Jackson should have all the kids worked out.  As Football Manager Greg is doing his job.  However I have no doubt he's sticking his nose into Jackson's business as well. 

[Francois Jackson]

ask him yourself why why why?????

GMiller@richmondfc.com.au

[Ramps]

ask him yourself why why why?????

GMiller@richmondfc.com.au

People should wait until everything closes tomorrow on the trade front before asking what we did and why. He may still get a good pick for schulz, he may find a decent deal for a ruckman ... who knows. Im advocating patience until tomorrow.

[Francois Jackson]

its not good enuf mate it really isnt..

ill reserve my judgement till this time 2mow but i cant see how they will do any trades that we r happy with judging by what they have come up with so far

[Ramps]

Has there been any finalisation of this trade of schulz to Port?

[richmondrules]

thats what miller means by the rfc being "active"

miller is a class opne d head, full of his own sh it, and as i said, he is out to destroy us.

btw, wasnt miller supposed to have taken a backward step through all this.

march may as well start packing his bags along with miller and the tanned salesmann

[one-eyed]

5AA just reported that the deal on the table is this: Not confirmed or done yet!

Schulz to Port Adelaide
Symes to Adelaide
Adelaide's pick 28 (that they got for Mattner) to Port
Port would then ontrade pick 28 to Richmond

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9151103&postcount=75

[{X}]

5AA just reported that the deal on the table is this: Not confirmed or done yet!

Schulz to Port Adelaide
Symes to Adelaide
Adelaide's pick 28 (that they got for Mattner) to Port
Port would then ontrade pick 28 to Richmond

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9151103&postcount=75

if thats the case at least its in the top 30.

but is that all miller has to show for being "active"

[Ramps]

5AA just reported that the deal on the table is this: Not confirmed or done yet!

Schulz to Port Adelaide
Symes to Adelaide
Adelaide's pick 28 (that they got for Mattner) to Port
Port would then ontrade pick 28 to Richmond

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9151103&postcount=75

At 28- its unlikely we'll find anything worthwhile... its a late pick in this draft. 28 this year is like 50 last year.

[bluey_21]

5AA just reported that the deal on the table is this: Not confirmed or done yet!

Schulz to Port Adelaide
Symes to Adelaide
Adelaide's pick 28 (that they got for Mattner) to Port
Port would then ontrade pick 28 to Richmond

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9151103&postcount=75

At 28- its unlikely we'll find anything worthwhile... its a late pick in this draft. 28 this year is like 50 last year.

we got connors in the 50s didn't we

[Ramps]

5AA just reported that the deal on the table is this: Not confirmed or done yet!

Schulz to Port Adelaide
Symes to Adelaide
Adelaide's pick 28 (that they got for Mattner) to Port
Port would then ontrade pick 28 to Richmond

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9151103&postcount=75

At 28- its unlikely we'll find anything worthwhile... its a late pick in this draft. 28 this year is like 50 last year.

we got connors in the 50s didn't we

I knew the first reply would come back with the conners thing. Conners fell because of bad test results at the draft camp and whilst he has exhibit great aggression and a bit of mongrel and yes I think he can play he still has a way to go. Im not at all confident that theres a Daniel Conners waiting at 28 this year sadly.

[bluey_21]

Selwood?