Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Free kick to Big Vick – chopping the armswas it paid?
3, 50 m penalties ?
He'll be our best pick up ever
It doesn't look good when Jack tries the things he did on Saturday, but in the regular season he'd kick them for himself. He would have had 3 or 4 goals against the Bumbers if he'd gone for goal instead of being unselfish.
Quote from: wayne on March 04, 2013, 02:59:05 PMIt doesn't look good when Jack tries the things he did on Saturday, but in the regular season he'd kick them for himself. He would have had 3 or 4 goals against the Bumbers if he'd gone for goal instead of being unselfish.i was of the belief that Jack was told not to go for goal but to work on certain things. Such as bodying and running patterns. Well thats what it appeared anyway
Quote from: Bengal on March 06, 2013, 06:53:39 PMQuote from: wayne on March 04, 2013, 02:59:05 PMIt doesn't look good when Jack tries the things he did on Saturday, but in the regular season he'd kick them for himself. He would have had 3 or 4 goals against the Bumbers if he'd gone for goal instead of being unselfish.i was of the belief that Jack was told not to go for goal but to work on certain things. Such as bodying and running patterns. Well thats what it appeared anywayWut
Quote from: Coach on March 06, 2013, 07:08:04 PMQuote from: Bengal on March 06, 2013, 06:53:39 PMQuote from: wayne on March 04, 2013, 02:59:05 PMIt doesn't look good when Jack tries the things he did on Saturday, but in the regular season he'd kick them for himself. He would have had 3 or 4 goals against the Bumbers if he'd gone for goal instead of being unselfish.i was of the belief that Jack was told not to go for goal but to work on certain things. Such as bodying and running patterns. Well thats what it appeared anywayWutYou didnt notice him running into goal and instead of having a shot, which he normally would, he would pass it off
Quote from: Bengal on March 07, 2013, 03:38:34 AMQuote from: Coach on March 06, 2013, 07:08:04 PMQuote from: Bengal on March 06, 2013, 06:53:39 PMQuote from: wayne on March 04, 2013, 02:59:05 PMIt doesn't look good when Jack tries the things he did on Saturday, but in the regular season he'd kick them for himself. He would have had 3 or 4 goals against the Bumbers if he'd gone for goal instead of being unselfish.i was of the belief that Jack was told not to go for goal but to work on certain things. Such as bodying and running patterns. Well thats what it appeared anywayWutYou didnt notice him running into goal and instead of having a shot, which he normally would, he would pass it offYeah I noticed that. Your quote was "i was of the belief that Jack was told not to go for goal but to work on certain things. Such as bodying and running patterns" I honestly couldn't fathom our brain trust telling him not to kick for goal. Don't worry about Jacky though, he did all of that on purpose to make a point to the coaches. Now they'll tell him not to worry about passing whenever he is in range. Not that he would in the season proper anyway. Smart boy is our Jack
That over the fence should have been a free. Was pushed in the back and over he went
Quote from: WilliamPowell on March 09, 2013, 06:16:55 PMThat over the fence should have been a free. Was pushed in the back and over he wentOnce again I am glad we won and can complain about the umpiring, the Dawks were so much better treated by the umps especially how they would drop the ball or get spun 360 without frees.
