Author Topic: Trent Cotchin [merged]  (Read 507462 times)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1020 on: February 24, 2014, 08:32:06 PM »
Oh well if we are making poo up I want him to kick 66 goals per season

Anything below that will be a failure.

I also want him to average 15 tackles a game as well. Just throwing it out there.

Well WAT wants him to kick 2-4 a game. If he does that he will be around the 60 mark. Not unrealistic. Actually I think we should be pushing all our midfielders to kick at least 30+ and that includes Jacko.

coach, hey, he might kick 3-6 a game, that would be great too!!!

Realistically, 1-2 with the occasional 3-4 thrown in would be a very good season..

Hey muchacho. You said 2-4 a game, that is 44 at the very least for the season. Not sure what the issue is here.

What I can't change my mind Newman??? Bottom line guy, he need's to become a goal kicking midfielder..... Can't you see that, six goals is not enough in a season for someone that plays in his position. Get with the times, it's not the thirties like when you played.. :wallywink
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1021 on: February 24, 2014, 08:50:16 PM »
Wtf the goal posts are changing, fair enough then instead of 15 tackles per game I want Cotch to do 14 per game

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1022 on: February 24, 2014, 09:04:23 PM »
Wtf the goal posts are changing, fair enough then instead of 15 tackles per game I want Cotch to do 14 per game

 :shh :thumbsup
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1023 on: February 24, 2014, 09:05:50 PM »
Why does harewick decide that now when according to him it seems obvious ?
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1024 on: February 24, 2014, 09:15:40 PM »
Why does harewick decide that now when according to him it seems obvious ?

What do you mean Ox?
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1025 on: February 25, 2014, 12:52:00 PM »
Oh well if we are making poo up I want him to kick 66 goals per season

Anything below that will be a failure.

I also want him to average 15 tackles a game as well. Just throwing it out there.

Well WAT wants him to kick 2-4 a game. If he does that he will be around the 60 mark. Not unrealistic. Actually I think we should be pushing all our midfielders to kick at least 30+ and that includes Jacko.

coach, hey, he might kick 3-6 a game, that would be great too!!!

Realistically, 1-2 with the occasional 3-4 thrown in would be a very good season..

Hey muchacho. You said 2-4 a game, that is 44 at the very least for the season. Not sure what the issue is here.

What I can't change my mind Newman??? Bottom line guy, he need's to become a goal kicking midfielder..... Can't you see that, six goals is not enough in a season for someone that plays in his position. Get with the times, it's not the thirties like when you played.. :wallywink

So what you're saying is...Cotchin isn't good enough to play for Richmond unless he's kicking 60 a season and winnings Colemans?

Offline Dice

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1026 on: February 25, 2014, 01:08:36 PM »
So what you're saying is...Cotchin isn't good enough to play for Richmond unless he's kicking 60 a season and winnings Colemans?

That's correct Coach. Throw in a Charlie and a Normy and he gets a pass mark.
Tanking has put the club where it's at - Paul Roos

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1027 on: February 25, 2014, 01:15:58 PM »
So what you're saying is...Cotchin isn't good enough to play for Richmond unless he's kicking 60 a season and winnings Colemans?

That's correct Coach. Throw in a Charlie and a Normy and he gets a pass mark.

Even Dice can see it. Also WAT, don't mention anything about my playing days.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1028 on: February 25, 2014, 01:27:22 PM »
So what you're saying is...Cotchin isn't good enough to play for Richmond unless he's kicking 60 a season and winnings Colemans?

That's correct Coach. Throw in a Charlie and a Normy and he gets a pass mark.

Even Dice can see it. Also WAT, don't mention anything about my playing days.

So what your saying is you were the best player going around....
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1029 on: February 26, 2014, 03:47:14 PM »
Whoa! Coach!!! :bow
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1030 on: February 26, 2014, 03:50:45 PM »
Yeah what mate?

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1031 on: February 26, 2014, 05:30:17 PM »
Yeah what mate?
Just didn't realise you were that good mate!
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1032 on: February 26, 2014, 08:42:33 PM »
Yeah what mate?
Just didn't realise you were that good mate!

Mate he is the best there ever was...was.....just ask him, hang on, he will tell you.. ;D
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1033 on: February 26, 2014, 08:48:55 PM »
Not sure I have ever mentioned anything about when I played. Old 65 did some digging and seems to think he knows me and blokes like you lap it up. And it has nothing to do with Trent Cotchin yet you're the one who raised it.

We should be focusing on getting rid of Chimp if he doesn't win the Coleman, right?

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Trent Cotchin [merged]
« Reply #1034 on: February 26, 2014, 08:52:50 PM »
Not sure I have ever mentioned anything about when I played. Old 65 did some digging and seems to think he knows me and blokes like you lap it up. And it has nothing to do with Trent Cotchin yet you're the one who raised it.

We should be focusing on getting rid of Chimp if he doesn't win the Coleman, right?

Actually it is a Brownlow and Coleman double