Author Topic: Our picks - 2, 18, 51, 67, ...  (Read 3430 times)

Bull

  • Guest
Re: Our picks - 2, 18, 51, 67, ...
« Reply #15 on: October 14, 2007, 08:45:03 AM »
18 to 51 is too bigger gap.

We should have taken 28 for Shultz, giving us 3 picks inside 30.

Take a look at Port, they now how to keep their list developing.

Miller and Wallace keep talking about the age bracket rubbish, how can they achieve this if they trade our picks away.

Offline Fwoy3

  • Un-unRichmondlike
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
  • Shut the eff up Jack!
Re: Our picks - 2, 18, 51, 67, ...
« Reply #16 on: October 14, 2007, 01:10:01 PM »
Here's each club's picks. Most clubs have 2 picks inside the top 30. West Coast has the most with 5  :o while the Pies have none lol.

Adelaide: 10, 27, 38, 59, 75, 91
Brisbane: 8, 25, 41, 52, 57, 73, 89
Carlton:    1, 36, 46, 68, 84
Coll'wood: 31, 47, 63, 95, 96 (Barham)
Essendon: 6, 23, 39 (Daniher), 55, 71, 87
Fremantle: 7, 24, 40, 56, 72, 88
Geelong:   17, 34, 44, 50, 62, 82, 90, 98 (Donohue)
Hawthorn:  12, 29, 45, 61, 77, 93
Kangaroos: 15, 32, 37, 64, 80
Melbourne:  4, 14, 21, 53, 69, 85
Port Adel:   16, 28, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97
Richmond:   2, 18, 51, 67, 83
St Kilda:      9, 42, 58, 74
Sydney:      11, 26, 60, 76, 92
West Coast: 3, 13, 20, 22, 30, 54, 78, 94
Bulldogs:      5, 19, 35, 43, 48, 66, 70, 86

Didn't WCE trade away the pick 30 with 35 for the Doggies 22?
My parents bought me a Richmond jumper and enrolled me in a junior footy clinic in 1981...look at me now.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 57995
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Our picks - 2, 18, 51, 67, ...
« Reply #17 on: October 14, 2007, 07:01:00 PM »
Didn't WCE trade away the pick 30 with 35 for the Doggies 22?
Yep you're right fwoy. The Age has it wrong. Adelaide has pick 30 which they got from the doggies.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95465
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Our picks - 2, 18, 51, 67, ...
« Reply #18 on: October 15, 2007, 08:49:32 PM »
What draft picks 2, 18, 51 and 67 have produced in the past decade:

Pick 2

1998: Justin Longmuir
1999: Paul Hasleby
2000: Justin Koschitzke
2001: Luke Ball
2002: Daniel Wells
2003: Andrew Walker
2004: Jarryd Roughead
2005: Dale Thomas
2006: Scott Gumbleton

Pick 18

1998: Daniel Schell
1999: Rhyce Shaw (F/S)
2000: Daniel Kerr
2001: Shane Harvey
2002: Kris Shore
2003: Llane Spaanderman
2004: Cameron Wood
2005: Max Bailey
2006: Leroy Jetta

Pick 51

1998: David Loats
1999: Ricky O'Loughlin
2000: Dion Woods
2001: Pass (next player was Andrew Browne)
2002: Tim Boyle
2003: Matthew Ball
2004: Ben Eckermann
2005: Matthew Laidlaw
2006: Clint Benjamin

Pick 67

1998: Brett Backwell
1999: Robert Shirley
2000: Graham Johncock
2001: Pass (next player was redrafted Chris Hyde)
2002: Steven Alessio
2003: Pass (next player was Jordan Bannister)
2004: Tony Stribling
2005: Pass (next player was Heath Neville)
2006: Joe Anderson

Gordon Bennett

  • Guest
Re: Our picks - 2, 18, 51, 67, ...
« Reply #19 on: October 16, 2007, 08:50:32 AM »


Pick 18

1998: Daniel Schell

2001: Shane Harvey
2002: Kris Shore
2003: Llane Spaanderman


and people focus on our alleged bad recruiting. Look at these 4 examples from opposition clubs.

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Our picks - 2, 18, 51, 67, ...
« Reply #20 on: October 16, 2007, 11:56:47 AM »


Pick 18

1998: Daniel Schell

2001: Shane Harvey
2002: Kris Shore
2003: Llane Spaanderman


and people focus on our alleged bad recruiting. Look at these 4 examples from opposition clubs.


Why do you always seem to be making excuses for our performance which has been nothing short of disgraceful for 2 decades ::)