On workchoices.
He stated that work choices is dead, buried and cremated.
Well I listened to that interview on 3AW and he then signed a contract with Neil on radio because they kept asking the same questions over and over.
Then he was asked specificaly by a caller about the rights of junior workers and how it's unfair the labour goverment changed the legistlation on how many hours minimum that they can work.
He then stated that there are many areas of legislation that can be considered or changed if they are unfair.
Then he went on to say that BUT on the issue of workchoices we ( the liberal party ) have considered the voice of the people in 2007 and we have heard it loud and clear.... Workchoices is dead.
The fact is that he apposed workchoices when the Howard goverment proposed it. Fact.
I think this fella is unfairly critisised.
Tigra if you think work choices are dead you are living in another world. They will come back bigger than ever, albeit with different wordings. The result will be the same and its the workers who will feel the pinch. By the way it makes no difference to me personally in my occupation but i saw it personally happen to people around me and it wasn't goodL
The economic crudentials of the labour party in the last few years are far superiour than anything the Liberals have ever dished up. We avoided recession and before any of you start jumping up and down and saying at what cost bla bla bla well i didnt see any of you complaining when you took the $900 and kept it or when you insulated your house as i did. Maybe when you took the chance to collect the 50% tax break on the company car before December 30. Liberal voters have turned but only after they accepted all the handouts with open arms.
The biggest mistake Rudd did was not sack Garrett on the spot and make a stand. Outside of that the measures Labour put in place have been excellent
Rudd would've had the edge over Abbott. Gillard though i cant be too sure but still the choice is simple. Howard's little puppet or Gillard.
I wished someone stopped the boat when that f u k w i t arrived in our country.
you are completly wrong there Dan.
You said, "The economic crudentials of the labour party in the last few years are far superiour than anything the Liberals have ever dished up"
well what are their economic credentials?
Is it that you don't understand economics or you may be blinded by labor loyalism.
I stated that some of there ideas were ok but the implementation was ordinary.
The BER was a good idea when schools are left to work out what they need and how to use the money wisely. This we now know because most private schools have had success in building to their own needs.
But when your leader is allowed to dictate what government schools should have but don't need well that's where the problems arise.
You and I can build a 5 bedroom house for under 350000 but this government couldn't build a structure not much bigger than your lounge for under 500000. This portfolio led by your incompitent labor saviour and current unelected prime minister Julia Gillard.
The fact is that stimulus was a good idea but when people living overseas are getting their payment how can they spend it in this country and stimulate our economy.
I think you must acknowledge as labor do, the strength of our economy before labor took power and the billions of dollars in the black they had to spend.
The fact is Dan that the labor party at federal and state level try to do right but continualy stuff up time and time again. It's a pattern i've seen since I've been alive. My dad was a shop steward and a mad labor man until Paul Keating came along. I don't think he changed camps but I don't think he ever trusted labour again.
I ask you to show me one thing this government has done that they haven't stuffed up. Well if you can't think of one I will help you. They successfully were able to put up a sign on every school in the country announcing the BER. Well done Julia.