Why do the AEC exclude a whole lot of seats from the two-party-preferred vote? (8 seats at last count).
Bob Brown says that this argument about the TPP vote is ridiculous as when these excluded seats are included again Labor will surely be in front.
I didn't realise that either until last night when Antony Green mentioned it on ABC. It seems the job of the AEC is to try and get a result on Election Night foremostly and worry about completeness later on as the usual a +/-0.3% error on the counting of votes doesn't affect the final result and seat tally. However this time given both parties are 50/50 so a +/-0.3% does matter and as you say Jake the current TPP vote on the AEC site is actually meaningless until all the votes and preferences are counted. Those seats missing apparently favour Labor so Abbott is talking crap as usual.
In any case the TPP vote is irrelevant as it is most seats in the House of Reps that matter and that's up to which side the independents favour. Today the Greens formally backed Labor so effectively now it's 73 seats all (the Green backing will also give the ALP greater backing in the Senate for passing legislation). Now it's all down to Katter, Windsor, Oakeshott and Wilkie who Governs.
The stronger than expected economic data (GDP boost) was some bonus news for the ALP too albeit too late for the Election.