Plough's aftermatch media conference / Wallace flags changes

[Little Jackie]

GET REAL WP !  STAFF MEMBERS = Players.
Might also add this WAS addressed at his review at seasons end last year with changes made re meetings, ask your mate Miller.

I dont have any mates Jack 

I would have thought changes being made would be a good thing. That's what reviews are for arent they? 

 

Correct, the club forced the changes, not the coach in this instance

[richmondrules]

GET REAL WP !  STAFF MEMBERS = Players.
Might also add this WAS addressed at his review at seasons end last year with changes made re meetings, ask your mate Miller.

I dont have any mates Jack 

I would have thought changes being made would be a good thing. That's what reviews are for arent they? 

 

Correct, the club forced the changes, not the coach in this instance

Can't help getting the feeling Jackstar was reviewed right out of the RFC himself. lol.

[1980]

a busy boy Stevie
most the time his not even there 

So he's not busy because he's never in his office?  Makes you wonder how he has achieved such a fabulous result for the club in his time there then doesn't it?  I don't know what you do for a crust or where you have been in your life but I'll take a guess that with such an ignorant and ill-informed comment, not a lot of it has been spent at the pointy end of corporate town.

Fabulous result, you getting to sound like Terry Wallet.
I will take you to task here.
The worst 2 decisions made in this decade at the RFC were to honour Danny Frawleys contract and to give the other clown( wallet) a 5 year contract UNCONDITION!.
ASK Steve Wright about Terry Wallets KPI,s and he will look at you with a blank face  and start talking about another issue.
Corporate World. How on earth do you pay Wallet $600,000 a year with no KPI,s and UNCONDITIONAL!
As for his success of the Grand Prix, dig a bit deeper in regards to losses my friend

Those are 2 entirely conflicting statements mate

In order to avoid ending up with another unproven tool like Frawley, the price we had to pay was a 5 year deal with Wallace.

1) No coach with any experience or track record was going to coach us without some security
2) Frawley had left us in such a state that a new coach needed 2 years just to clean up the mess

Even if Wallace gets sacked at the end of the season, it was still the right decision at the time.

Spot on 1980.

If we are talking KPIs, Wallace's main one when he started was rebuilding the trainwreck of a list for long-term success. It's another reason why Plough got a 5 year contract. It'll be up to the club in 18 months time to judge whether Plough has done that and then judge if he is the right coach to take the next step. 

You say that main reason that Wallace got the 5 year contact was due to KPI,s in regards to rebuilding.
I will explain something for you. The club sets ( well supposedly sets the KPI,s  not the EMPLOYEE, in this instance WALLET)  The club hasnt set any KPI,s for this clown.
KPI,s are measured on a yearly basis Re: performance review.
Example being. Communication with staff members etc etc

Its well understood that it was a coaches market when it came to the RFC in 2004.

1) We didnt want to go through the whole Frawley saga again of getting our 5th choice to coach.
2) We didnt want to get laughed at again or rejected by coaches with experience as we did with Sheedy, Malthouse and Thompson before we appointed Frawley

Yes Wallace had a gun to our heads but as a club, not just the club but the supporters as well, were prepared to pay the price of 5 year contract, no KPIs blah blah.

But if Wallace hasnt taken us to where we need to be over a 5 year contract he'll get sacked, everyone will wantr that, and he will struggle to coach another footy club.

[mightytiges]

Can tell you they are they are 2 outs

Raines, Polo, Hyde = 3?

MT. you must have a reading problem or you cannot and will not admit your in love with Wallet.
Raines is out injured my friend, didnt get the axe

Raines is listed under the OUTS and will be replaced by one of the INs. I think someone needs to get a dictionary to understand the difference between "out" and "omitted"  .

[mightytiges]

a busy boy Stevie
most the time his not even there 

So he's not busy because he's never in his office?  Makes you wonder how he has achieved such a fabulous result for the club in his time there then doesn't it?  I don't know what you do for a crust or where you have been in your life but I'll take a guess that with such an ignorant and ill-informed comment, not a lot of it has been spent at the pointy end of corporate town.

Fabulous result, you getting to sound like Terry Wallet.
I will take you to task here.
The worst 2 decisions made in this decade at the RFC were to honour Danny Frawleys contract and to give the other clown( wallet) a 5 year contract UNCONDITION!.
ASK Steve Wright about Terry Wallets KPI,s and he will look at you with a blank face  and start talking about another issue.
Corporate World. How on earth do you pay Wallet $600,000 a year with no KPI,s and UNCONDITIONAL!
As for his success of the Grand Prix, dig a bit deeper in regards to losses my friend

Those are 2 entirely conflicting statements mate

In order to avoid ending up with another unproven tool like Frawley, the price we had to pay was a 5 year deal with Wallace.

1) No coach with any experience or track record was going to coach us without some security
2) Frawley had left us in such a state that a new coach needed 2 years just to clean up the mess

Even if Wallace gets sacked at the end of the season, it was still the right decision at the time.

Spot on 1980.

If we are talking KPIs, Wallace's main one when he started was rebuilding the trainwreck of a list for long-term success. It's another reason why Plough got a 5 year contract. It'll be up to the club in 18 months time to judge whether Plough has done that and then judge if he is the right coach to take the next step. 

You say that main reason that Wallace got the 5 year contact was due to KPI,s in regards to rebuilding.
I will explain something for you. The club sets ( well supposedly sets the KPI,s  not the EMPLOYEE, in this instance WALLET)  The club hasnt set any KPI,s for this clown.
KPI,s are measured on a yearly basis Re: performance review.
Example being. Communication with staff members etc etc

Jack you said yourself the board was not happy with Kingsley being recruited in the PSD the year before. I would say that's consistent with the club expecting a rebuild of the list as part of Wallace's 5-year term (mainly via youth with no other recruits over 24 y.o.). Rightly or wrongly the club has consistently talked about following a long-term plan and not reacting year by year as we did in the past.