Should Richmond chase after Daniel Kerr?

[shannon]

i am what i am, what does my sex or gender have anything to with anyone. im sure many people on here do not disclose their gender or lie about
but i am all woman, if you don't like it, not my prob!  

[shannon]

kerr will be an assett for us, just like brown has been. get your head around that

[Infamy]

Brown may be a good player, but he hardly got us playing finals did he, trading picks away for players is exactly why we've been poo for so long. Are you a slow learner or something, the last 25 years prove nothing to you?

Getting Kerr would cost us AT MINIMUM our first and 2nd round pick, that would cost us two top kids (considering this year the top 25 is very strong) who can play for us for 10+ years, not half that and with a questionable level of commitment and off field behaviour.
Kerr will be washed up by the time the Tigers are genuine contenders, that is a FACT!

[shannon]

from what i have heard this draft does not go deep and is not a superdraft. so what if we give up a 2nd round pick for kerr. there is no way in hell a 2nd round pick will even get half as good as kerr. this fascination with the draft is pathetic, not every kid in the draft becomes a star, most actually fail. kerr for a second round pick would be a win as he is worth a first round pick. what if we trade say a jon for kerr , dont think many would complain

[Infamy]

You're not very bright are you
Daniel Kerr is CONTRACTED to the Eagles for 2009, this means that we would need to find a trade that satisfies the Eagles to trade him.
In baby talk, this means that we would need to offer LOTS AND LOTS of EARLY picks, not a 2nd rounder like you think would do the job.
We would give up our entire draft position to get one player who would be gone by the time we are true contenders

If we finish around mid table then we'll get Picks 8-9 & 25ish, this gives us two of the Top 25 which are considered to be very good. It only thins out from there. This means that we will need to make 3 selections from the dregs that are left.

Great idea brainiac

[shannon]

You're not very bright are you
Daniel Kerr is CONTRACTED to the Eagles for 2009, this means that we would need to find a trade that satisfies the Eagles to trade him.
In baby talk, this means that we would need to offer LOTS AND LOTS of EARLY picks, not a 2nd rounder like you think would do the job.
We would give up our entire draft position to get one player who would be gone by the time we are true contenders

If we finish around mid table then we'll get Picks 8-9 & 25ish, this gives us two of the Top 25 which are considered to be very good. It only thins out from there. This means that we will need to make 3 selections from the dregs that are left.

Great idea brainiac

you dont have to get insulting.
but since you are so intelligent, you will know that say kerr says to the wce, i want out and want to go to the rfc so trade. so trade week starts and kerr says i want to go or i quit and sit out footy all together. then the tigers say we will trade our 2 rnd pick for kerr and thats it, or trade jon . there is no reason why they wont accept one of those 2 trades if both parties want to separate.

and btw, from what i have heard, after pick 15, the draft is very weak. as miller said last week, this is no superdraft, its very thin and far from it.

so if you want to start insulting people and resort to that behaviour, call your mother

[Stripes]

From what I have heard we will offer our first round draft pick plus a second round pick we have obtained from trading Schulz to secure Kerr. I was very upset when I heard this but the more I think of it at 24 he would be worth a first round pick around 6 - 9.

Interesting trade period. Lots of teams will be looking for draft picks and be willing to off load players to get them.

Stripes

[shannon]

From what I have heard we will offer our first round draft pick plus a second round pick we have obtained from trading Schulz to secure Kerr. I was very upset when I heard this but the more I think of it at 24 he would be worth a first round pick around 6 - 9.

Interesting trade period. Lots of teams will be looking for draft picks and be willing to off load players to get them.

Stripes

so kerr is only 24, so why are so many fools on here saying he is 26.  lets face facts, kerr is better than any player in this draft, he is worth pick 1.
i say chase him, he would be great for us. imagine deledio, cotchin, kerr, foley, tambling, edwards, tuck and a fit cogs rotating through our midfield. 

[Francois Jackson]

From what I have heard we will offer our first round draft pick plus a second round pick we have obtained from trading Schulz to secure Kerr. I was very upset when I heard this but the more I think of it at 24 he would be worth a first round pick around 6 - 9.

Interesting trade period. Lots of teams will be looking for draft picks and be willing to off load players to get them.

Stripes

so kerr is only 24, so why are so many fools on here saying he is 26.  lets face facts, kerr is better than any player in this draft, he is worth pick 1.
i say chase him, he would be great for us. imagine deledio, cotchin, kerr, foley, tambling, edwards, tuck and a fit cogs rotating through our midfield. 

May 16, 1983 is his birth date so yeah he is only 25, just turned...

[Smokey]

so kerr is only 24, so why are so many fools on here saying he is 26. 

Born 16th May 1983 - makes him 25.

[Ramps]

Kerr turns 26 in May 2009

[jackstar]

From what I have heard we will offer our first round draft pick plus a second round pick we have obtained from trading Schulz to secure Kerr. I was very upset when I heard this but the more I think of it at 24 he would be worth a first round pick around 6 - 9.

Interesting trade period. Lots of teams will be looking for draft picks and be willing to off load players to get them.

Stripes

Would like to know where you get you mail from, ????? As it is 98% right.    1st Round pick and Schultz and one other player
Interesting that RFC leaks like a siv  . Might just add I dont agree with getting Kerr either, we need SIZE in our team, not MIDGETS

[Hes My Hero]

Ok lets settle this once and for all.
These are Kerrs particulars - straight from the Weagles site.
Looking at this he turns 26 on the 5th of May 2009

Height: 178 Weight: 77 DOB: 16-05-1983

[Francois Jackson]

From what I have heard we will offer our first round draft pick plus a second round pick we have obtained from trading Schulz to secure Kerr. I was very upset when I heard this but the more I think of it at 24 he would be worth a first round pick around 6 - 9.

Interesting trade period. Lots of teams will be looking for draft picks and be willing to off load players to get them.

Stripes

Would like to know where you get you mail from, ????? As it is 98% right.    1st Round pick and Schultz and one other player
Interesting that RFC leaks like a siv  . Might just add I dont agree with getting Kerr either, we need SIZE in our team, not MIDGETS

unless there is another schulz running around, i wouldn't even put schulz and kerr in the same sentence, let alone as part of a trade deal.

schulz straight swap for dale kickett, thats about it

[Ramps]

From what I have heard we will offer our first round draft pick plus a second round pick we have obtained from trading Schulz to secure Kerr. I was very upset when I heard this but the more I think of it at 24 he would be worth a first round pick around 6 - 9.

Interesting trade period. Lots of teams will be looking for draft picks and be willing to off load players to get them.

Stripes

Would like to know where you get you mail from, ????? As it is 98% right.    1st Round pick and Schultz and one other player
Interesting that RFC leaks like a siv  . Might just add I dont agree with getting Kerr either, we need SIZE in our team, not MIDGETS

i think we will overpay for Kerr. hes worth a 1st rounder around pick 7 - 10 and Schulz (ontraded for a 2nd rounder). There is no need to include another player as well.