Author Topic: Mitch Morton [merged]  (Read 18455 times)

Offline Number20

  • Tiger Rookie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Mitch Morton
« Reply #60 on: January 24, 2010, 07:20:08 PM »
The Eagles did not give him enough time in the middle for him to actually achieve any form, then when he was in the side he was plonked in the forward line, rotated off the bench and the rest is history.

We recruited him as a midfielder/forward more as a midfielder though but again because our forward line lacked a bit of fire power with Petts and Brown down he was again managed poorly. IMO if we gave him time in the centre you never know.

Its interesting because I love watching him in the forward line. I would prefer him there than in the midfield! I watched him at the Eagles too and he didnt get alot of game time full stop let alone in the midfield or forward line. It was there mistake though, they will rue it for years to come I suspect. They gave that finals game to Jamie Macnamara instead of Morton and now look, Jamie has been delisted. What a waste!

Imo, he is too good infront of goals and just has too much flash to put him anywhere else. Might be interesting to see if a change of coach changes things at all. Hardwick might have an all together different opinon.

1965

  • Guest
Re: Mitch Morton
« Reply #61 on: January 24, 2010, 07:39:38 PM »
The Eagles did not give him enough time in the middle for him to actually achieve any form, then when he was in the side he was plonked in the forward line, rotated off the bench and the rest is history.

We recruited him as a midfielder/forward more as a midfielder though but again because our forward line lacked a bit of fire power with Petts and Brown down he was again managed poorly. IMO if we gave him time in the centre you never know.

Don't feed the (WCE) troll.

 ::)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Mitch Morton
« Reply #62 on: January 24, 2010, 09:08:55 PM »
The Eagles did not give him enough time in the middle for him to actually achieve any form, then when he was in the side he was plonked in the forward line, rotated off the bench and the rest is history.

We recruited him as a midfielder/forward more as a midfielder though but again because our forward line lacked a bit of fire power with Petts and Brown down he was again managed poorly. IMO if we gave him time in the centre you never know.

Its interesting because I love watching him in the forward line. I would prefer him there than in the midfield! I watched him at the Eagles too and he didnt get alot of game time full stop let alone in the midfield or forward line. It was there mistake though, they will rue it for years to come I suspect. They gave that finals game to Jamie Macnamara instead of Morton and now look, Jamie has been delisted. What a waste!

Imo, he is too good infront of goals and just has too much flash to put him anywhere else. Might be interesting to see if a change of coach changes things at all. Hardwick might have an all together different opinon.

Yeah, I think we will find Hardwick will move a few of these players around a bit and take them out of their comfort zone, good thing too. I am also looking forward to seeing Morton this year I truely believe he is one player that can really turn into something...."special"... :thumbsup
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

richmondrules

  • Guest
Re: Mitch Morton
« Reply #63 on: January 25, 2010, 07:42:04 AM »
The Eagles did not give him enough time in the middle for him to actually achieve any form, then when he was in the side he was plonked in the forward line, rotated off the bench and the rest is history.

We recruited him as a midfielder/forward more as a midfielder though but again because our forward line lacked a bit of fire power with Petts and Brown down he was again managed poorly. IMO if we gave him time in the centre you never know.

Don't feed the (WCE) troll.

 ::)

That's a bit harsh '65. I get the feeling Number20 actually likes Mitch and is genuinely interested. They have made no secret that they followed him at WCE. I can't see anything offensive in any of Number20's posts.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Mitch Morton
« Reply #64 on: January 25, 2010, 12:32:51 PM »
The Eagles did not give him enough time in the middle for him to actually achieve any form, then when he was in the side he was plonked in the forward line, rotated off the bench and the rest is history.

We recruited him as a midfielder/forward more as a midfielder though but again because our forward line lacked a bit of fire power with Petts and Brown down he was again managed poorly. IMO if we gave him time in the centre you never know.
the eagles didnt give a go fullstop and there was damn good reasons. squbbing out of contests is one thing few coaches would tolerate worsfold i expect would be less tolerant than most. without doubt mitch thought he had made it when at the eagles the reports on his big head are well known over here.

and if im not mistaken i believe we promised to play him of hb with midfield rotations when we drafted him. he didnt want to be pencilled in as a permanent forward.

it doesnt matter the player, weather it be a mid who has to go forward or back  or a specialist forward who has to rotate thru the midfield all players should be expected to be able to rotate and share the mid field work load they have to be better players for it.

already theres been numerous games where morton has gone missing for huge chunks of games. or had poor ones full stop.
being able to go thru the midfield should free him up and keep him involved in games its got to be a good thing.its certainly got to be good for team mates.  his foot skills when passing are very good he eases the work load and he will require attention because of his skills thus freeing someone else up.
  leon davis anyone didak are examples of samall forwards getting time in the mid field you could even put ablett in that category if you want to stretch it a bit. chapman as well. any way i think people  get the gist.

Offline MADTIGER2010

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Mitch Morton
« Reply #65 on: January 26, 2010, 09:07:08 AM »
Needs to become a 50 goal forward in 2010.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Mitch Morton
« Reply #66 on: January 27, 2010, 08:33:27 PM »
Needs to become a 50 goal forward in 2010.
if he plays as a medium sized forward permanently i would be happy with 35 goals and thats far more realistic.yep 35 goals and a much bigger output in defensive pressure will do fine.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Mitch Morton [merged]
« Reply #67 on: June 26, 2010, 12:43:30 PM »
Of all the RFC guys running around for Coburg today I'd reckon Hardwick will be watching Mitch the most. Not so to bring him in the side next week but whether he'll eventually adapt to a more team-orientated defensive-minded tackler and chaser when he/we doesn't have the ball.

Someone on the radio the other day made the interesting point that many of the players we offloaded and retired at the end of last year weren't known for their defensive side of their game. Even Richo as great as he was didn't have big tackling stats (probably didn't to but anyway). It seems Mitch is still struggling to come to terms with being use to the way our better forwards in past years use to play (all out offensively minded) and the way Hardwick wants our forwards now to play. Compare Mitch to Jack who is strong at ground level and team-oriented as shown by his game last week pushing up the ground. That's where Mitch has to get to before he comes back into the side.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Mitch Morton [merged]
« Reply #68 on: June 26, 2010, 12:46:54 PM »
Of all the RFC guys running around for Coburg today I'd reckon Hardwick will be watching Mitch the most. Not so to bring him in the side next week but whether he'll eventually adapt to a more team-orientated defensive-minded tackler and chaser when he/we doesn't have the ball.

Someone on the radio the other day made the interesting point that many of the players we offloaded and retired at the end of last year weren't known for their defensive side of their game. Even Richo as great as he was didn't have big tackling stats (probably didn't to but anyway). It seems Mitch is still struggling to come to terms with being use to the way our better forwards in past years use to play (all out offensively minded) and the way Hardwick wants our forwards now to play. Compare Mitch to Jack who is strong at ground level and team-oriented as shown by his game last week pushing up the ground. That's where Mitch has to get to before he comes back into the side.

100% correct MT and if Mitch is able to adapt his game to meet those standards he will be a very very very good player - if not he will just be another on the scrapheap of unfulfilled potential.

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Mitch Morton [merged]
« Reply #69 on: June 26, 2010, 07:07:07 PM »
Didn't do himself any favours with today's effort.

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3811
Re: Mitch Morton [merged]
« Reply #70 on: June 27, 2010, 09:33:18 AM »
Should be left in the forward line at Coburg

Offline Jacosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
  • No bish fish, the moon wasnt right.
Re: Mitch Morton [merged]
« Reply #71 on: June 27, 2010, 11:02:10 AM »
Should be left in the forward line at Coburg

A lot of people on her are saying his lack of defensive pressure is why he is back i the burbs.
Watching the game yesterday and talking to my son, i was wodering out loud if Dimma had any say in him playing up the ground more to try and get him playing the way Dimma would like.
If so it didnt seem to be working and this could well be the end of Mitch at RFC im afraid. 

Offline RedanTiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: Mitch Morton [merged]
« Reply #72 on: June 28, 2010, 01:18:40 AM »
Should be left in the forward line at Coburg

A lot of people on her are saying his lack of defensive pressure is why he is back i the burbs.
Watching the game yesterday and talking to my son, i was wodering out loud if Dimma had any say in him playing up the ground more to try and get him playing the way Dimma would like.
If so it didnt seem to be working and this could well be the end of Mitch at RFC im afraid. 

Yeah, picked and set-up on the wing but noted that he managed to slip up forward to kick two goals.
While it might be good to be a goal-kicking midfielder I don't think they want him to be loose in the goal square which is where he kicked his first from memory.
He still seems to have the set in his mind that if he goes forward and kicks goals then that is what will save him.
Doubt that Hardwick agrees even though they did move him forward for a period in the third when they were in trouble for goal kickers.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Mitch Morton [merged]
« Reply #73 on: June 28, 2010, 07:00:38 AM »
Escapes a lot of flack when compared to other whipping boys.

Mitch is our most disappointing player of 2010.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Mitch Morton [merged]
« Reply #74 on: June 28, 2010, 11:02:48 AM »
Escapes a lot of flack when compared to other whipping boys.

Mitch is our most disappointing player of 2010.

Would have to agree with this comment, totally.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"