.........
i dont see any comparing him against his peers and giving an opinion where he sits. why because any honest person will have him well down the pecking order.
some things are obvious but not to rfc supporters it seems.
Statistically and end result wise he stands up very well against his peers.
All sides play 1 small forward and many play 2. For argument's sake I'll go with half the teams in the league.
That means 27 small forwards. Statistically he's 5th for goals (or was last week) and 3 rd for tackles.
As I said previously, he aint the problem.
I don't need a battering ram to be offered a differing view to my own. But you offer no statistics no comparisons, just criticise him based on your own view and opinion. Publicly available KPI's and stats would indicate he's performing his role. Then you don't even accept them. You argue compare him to his peers and he stacks up OK.
It get's pointed out that you're wrong on his tackling and it becomes "he's second to the ball". I see lots of intense chases where he shouldn't even be in the contest but wills himself to it. (Remember the 4th quarter vs Lions.)
You claim it's obvious but wont accept counter arguments and deride people with a different view. Given the facts (note: facts not opinions, not perceptions) it's no where near as obvious as you make out. I could suggest the obvious bit...