Author Topic: Next Richmond Coach Preference  (Read 9548 times)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #60 on: March 28, 2009, 01:08:05 PM »
This is getting boring....... gee lets drag it out until round 22... ::)
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline 1980

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #61 on: March 28, 2009, 01:10:54 PM »
I'm with infamy. Hardwick if we go for a rookie coach.

LMFAO at Campbell's one year coaching experience putting him up as a contender amongst the inbred Richmond clique. Same methodology they applied to Tony Free on the board with his 1 year business experience running a juice bar.

Malthouse is the one senior coach that can sort out the club, and the one AFL coach still going around that gets the best out of an average list. But it is way beyond the abilities of Gary March to pull that one off. He'll probably offer him a membership ambassador role in 10 years after he's finished coaching and the rest of the AFL doesnt want him.

Offline blaisee

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1359
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #62 on: March 28, 2009, 01:19:47 PM »
I'm with infamy. Hardwick if we go for a rookie coach.

LMFAO at Campbell's one year coaching experience putting him up as a contender amongst the inbred Richmond clique. Same methodology they applied to Tony Free on the board with his 1 year business experience running a juice bar.

Malthouse is the one senior coach that can sort out the club, and the one AFL coach still going around that gets the best out of an average list. But it is way beyond the abilities of Gary March to pull that one off. He'll probably offer him a membership ambassador role in 10 years after he's finished coaching and the rest of the AFL doesnt want him.

1980 is right

first pick is harwick, if not him malty or chocco for me

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13335
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #63 on: March 28, 2009, 02:30:29 PM »
Glad to see you are all happy with what was dished up the other night, Go Tiges!

Where were you hiding in the latter half of season 2008.

Were you supporting the tiges or posting on a demons forum somewhere about how crap Bailey is as a coach and pushing for regime change there.


Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #64 on: March 28, 2009, 03:44:25 PM »
Glad to see you are all happy with what was dished up the other night, Go Tiges!

Where were you hiding in the latter half of season 2008.

Were you supporting the tiges or posting on a demons forum somewhere about how crap Bailey is as a coach and pushing for regime change there.



I actually havent posted for 6 months, thats means september 2008 by my maths.
You can support Terry at centrelink in a few weeks if you want ;)

Offline blaisee

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1359
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #65 on: March 28, 2009, 04:15:10 PM »
Glad to see you are all happy with what was dished up the other night, Go Tiges!

Where were you hiding in the latter half of season 2008.

Were you supporting the tiges or posting on a demons forum somewhere about how crap Bailey is as a coach and pushing for regime change there.



rubbish JACK

YOU STOPPED POSTING BEFORE THAT

MORE LIES FROM JACKSTAR ::)

I actually havent posted for 6 months, thats means september 2008 by my maths.
You can support Terry at centrelink in a few weeks if you want ;)

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14279
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #66 on: March 28, 2009, 05:11:35 PM »
Hardwick or Lethal id be happy with.

Dont really know where to put this quote so ill type it here.

"We want to improver all the time. At evert training drillif there is one kick that doesn't hit the target we start the drill again"

Sam Mitchell Hawks Captain.

Thats the quote of a premership captain who is part of a team who doesn't accept 15 metre kicks who dont hit their targets.

Anyone see jackson's 3 metre kick that resulted in a goal to the blues.

My god what a joke that guy is. Tough guy who we need, but he is a very average footballer
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 41303
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #67 on: March 28, 2009, 06:14:34 PM »
Glad to see you are all happy with what was dished up the other night, Go Tiges!

I understand you are bit rusty  ;D

So I will explain this one more time from my perspective.

I am anything but happy with what was "dished up the other night"; far from it.

It was a pathetic, deplorable, unacceptable, shameful, insipid effort that embarrassed the entire Richmond Football Club

It has gutted alot of people

But I will not sit at this keyboard and blame one person and one person only for it. I blame the 22 blokes who ran out on the ground the blokes sitting up in the coaches box. They are all to blame can I make it any clearer



« Last Edit: March 29, 2009, 04:56:40 PM by WilliamPowell »
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #68 on: March 28, 2009, 07:22:04 PM »
its not about dropped  marks or poor skills.
All players can kick to a teammate and hit them lace up from 30-40 metres away. FACT
its about this.
They try and kick or handball through traffic . Problem is that we are too predictable and the oppposition sit on our players.
We always kick short in D50 and its usually in congestion.
The game plan is to get teammates close to the ball carrier , thus the possesion is more likely to be a short possesion, in turn the opposition are drawn to the contest, thus its near impossible to have clean possesions and therefore cant release. Thus we turn it over
Supporters and media say its poor skiils, in my opinion , very poor game plan that the current group of players cannot perform.
We need to spread at contests and not be drawn to contests, as in close and tight, the likes of McMahon and Edwards are usually pushed  aside. Also the game plan is flawed as it is near impossible to excute anyway, (kicking through traffic )
by the way,
wayne campbell is our next coach. ;)

I agree totally with this thread- our game plan is poo. It's our players playing this shyt style of footy but this is how we are coached to play. We in our defensive 50 never look forward for an option first, it's always sideways or backward. We never give our forwards a chance to be one out. Watching last nights game the Hawks just run as hard as they can, tackle as hard as they can, and kick the ball long and put faith in each other to win the contest. And at no time do they GIVE UP, regards of the scoreboard. They make it look pretty simple!

Sure we won some games late last year but that is last year and to be totally honest with you, teams (not in finals contention) towards the end of the year maybe don't try as hard as they would earlier in the year, putting players in for ops early or playing kids maybe not quite ready (darft picks in mind and all). So saying that i wouldn't give TW too many pats on the back for those wins late last year.

Now i am a pretty black and white sort of person so the other thing that gets to me is people saying how we have a history of sacking coaches, so f@#king what! There is no coach that has been sacked that didn't deserve it. And i think TW time is just about up. The other night for me in front of 90,000 people, round 1, has just cemented what i already knew. Terry Wallace cannot coach




Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #69 on: March 28, 2009, 09:33:35 PM »
Glad to see you are all happy with what was dished up the other night, Go Tiges!

Where were you hiding in the latter half of season 2008.

Were you supporting the tiges or posting on a demons forum somewhere about how crap Bailey is as a coach and pushing for regime change there.



rubbish JACK

YOU STOPPED POSTING BEFORE THAT

MORE LIES FROM JACKSTAR ::)



Hey Blaisee
i actually stopped posting 6 months ago.
Someone else is posting under Jackstar , FACT
Regards
Jamie.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100646
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Odds are Kevin Sheedy won't coach (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #70 on: March 29, 2009, 03:59:28 AM »
Odds are Kevin Sheedy won't coach
Rod Nicholson | March 28, 2009

CORPORATE bookmaker Centrebet is betting against former Tiger great and Essendon coaching legend Kevin Sheedy taking over as Richmond coach this season.

Sheedy's odds are $13 to coach Richmond before Round 12; $8 to assume the role between Round 12 to 22 and $1.14 not to coach the Tigers at all in 2009.

The bookmaker, however, does not provide odds about incumbent Terry Wallace (left) surviving his fifth season at Tigerland.

Wallace's position is under pressure following season finishes of 12th, ninth, 16th and ninth, especially after Richmond was thrashed by Carlton by 83 points in the season opener at the MCG on Thursday, and with a trip to Geelong's Skilled Stadium on Saturday.

The bookmaker does not have a connection with the AFL, which forbids their bookmaking agents from betting on a coach's prospects.

Sheedy has coached 635 games.

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/sport/afl/story/0,26547,25257816-5016212,00.html

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14279
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #71 on: March 29, 2009, 04:29:39 PM »
its not about dropped  marks or poor skills.
All players can kick to a teammate and hit them lace up from 30-40 metres away. FACT
its about this.
They try and kick or handball through traffic . Problem is that we are too predictable and the oppposition sit on our players.
We always kick short in D50 and its usually in congestion.
The game plan is to get teammates close to the ball carrier , thus the possesion is more likely to be a short possesion, in turn the opposition are drawn to the contest, thus its near impossible to have clean possesions and therefore cant release. Thus we turn it over
Supporters and media say its poor skiils, in my opinion , very poor game plan that the current group of players cannot perform.
We need to spread at contests and not be drawn to contests, as in close and tight, the likes of McMahon and Edwards are usually pushed  aside. Also the game plan is flawed as it is near impossible to excute anyway, (kicking through traffic )
by the way,
wayne campbell is our next coach. ;)

I agree totally with this thread- our game plan is poo. It's our players playing this shyt style of footy but this is how we are coached to play. We in our defensive 50 never look forward for an option first, it's always sideways or backward. We never give our forwards a chance to be one out. Watching last nights game the Hawks just run as hard as they can, tackle as hard as they can, and kick the ball long and put faith in each other to win the contest. And at no time do they GIVE UP, regards of the scoreboard. They make it look pretty simple!

Sure we won some games late last year but that is last year and to be totally honest with you, teams (not in finals contention) towards the end of the year maybe don't try as hard as they would earlier in the year, putting players in for ops early or playing kids maybe not quite ready (darft picks in mind and all). So saying that i wouldn't give TW too many pats on the back for those wins late last year.

Now i am a pretty black and white sort of person so the other thing that gets to me is people saying how we have a history of sacking coaches, so f@#king what! There is no coach that has been sacked that didn't deserve it. And i think TW time is just about up. The other night for me in front of 90,000 people, round 1, has just cemented what i already knew. Terry Wallace cannot coach





Your right there about the face he can't coach.

I judge a coach on our performances and he is not up to it.

NO FINALS AND STILL CANT BEAT TOP 8 SIDES. FACT!!

OUR SKILL LEVEL IS AS BAD AS IT WAS WHEN HE FIRST ARRIVED...FACT!!

OUR RELIANCE IS STILL ON A 34 YEAR OLD. FACT!!

OUR FAILURE TO STOP TEAMS FROM DOING COAST TO COAST HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE THE DAY HE ARRIVED. FACT!!

OUR RECRUITING HAS BEEN PATHETIC TO SAY THE LEAST. FACT!!


can anyone seriously on this site say with a straight face our skill level has improved under this clown??

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Gordon Bennett

  • Guest
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #72 on: March 29, 2009, 05:00:03 PM »
So whose going to takeover when the inevitable occurs. Will it be an experienced big name coach or an untested coach. Tell us what you think!
what a useless thread.

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #73 on: March 29, 2009, 05:42:39 PM »
So whose going to takeover when the inevitable occurs. Will it be an experienced big name coach or an untested coach. Tell us what you think!
what a useless thread.

My useless thread has had over 70 replies and the best you can do is "what a useless thread" Common Gordy you can do better than that surely. :lol

Offline Fishfinger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2465
  • You can't put brains in an idiot
Re: Next Richmond Coach Preference
« Reply #74 on: March 30, 2009, 12:31:58 AM »
So whose going to takeover when the inevitable occurs. Will it be an experienced big name coach or an untested coach. Tell us what you think!
I think Adam Simpson. He'll get to play another year at North and then have a couple of years as an assistant somewhere before Wallace goes in 3 or 4 years time.
It's 50 of one and half a dozen of the other - Don Scott