Author Topic: Football department the priority for Tigers (Age)  (Read 802 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98057
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Football department the priority for Tigers (Age)
« on: July 02, 2009, 01:35:45 AM »
Football department the priority for Tigers
Jake Niall | July 2, 2009

RICHMOND will not spend heavily on its next senior coach to the detriment of other areas of its football department.

While the Tigers have sufficient financial strength to pay the next coach well, they are determined to ensure that whoever is appointed is given the necessary structure and staff to succeed, and making a well-resourced football department is the priority.

Richmond football operations manager Craig Cameron said last night the Tigers had no issue with paying the coach handsomely, but the club wanted to ensure that the football department was properly resourced.

"The most important thing is that we properly resource all areas of the department, and in doing that we give the next coach of the Richmond footy club the best chance of success," he said.

Cameron said the Tigers had not set a maximum figure they would be willing to pay a coach.

Unless there is a surprise candidate, the only possible candidates for the coaching position who might command hefty wages would be Nathan Buckley and his former coach Michael Malthouse. Malthouse, in any case, has made it clear that he wishes to continue at Collingwood in 2010.

Buckley is expected to go through Richmond's process in its search for a coach.

Richmond, which ranks about 12th in football department spending, expects a small rise in its football budget next year, and has identified strength and conditioning, medical and technology — including recruiting technology — as areas it will need further resources in next year and beyond.

The club has already bolstered the area of developing coaching and recruiting. Three years ago it had no full-time recruiter, now it has three full-time recruiting staff.

The club is mindful that, as former coach Terry Wallace pointed out, it was not well-resourced in the football department in the first couple of years after his appointment.

The major question mark, in terms of football spending, is player payments next year. The club ranks about ninth in the AFL for player payments, but has six players aged over 30. The extent to which it reduces player payments, relative to other clubs, will depend largely on how many of the over-30 brigade — Matthew Richardson, Joel Bowden, Ben Cousins, Troy Simmonds and Nathan Brown — play on next year.

Kane Johnson has retired, and Richardson is likely to continue. If a further three players retired, then the club would likely have a significant reduction in payments.

http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/rfnews/footy-department-priority-for-tigers/2009/07/01/1246127579811.html

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Football department the priority for Tigers (Age)
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2009, 02:49:18 PM »
`And so it should be a priority, start by getting rid of the lot and letting the coach build his own department as well.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58595
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Football department the priority for Tigers (Age)
« Reply #2 on: July 03, 2009, 07:35:11 PM »
Quote
Richmond, which ranks about 12th in football department spending, expects a small rise in its football budget next year, and has identified strength and conditioning, medical and technology — including recruiting technology — as areas it will need further resources in next year and beyond.
Fitness staff would be one area that hasn't changed much from Spud's time. When we have a side that can only play at the right intensity for two quarters max then strength and conditioning should be near the top of the list for review.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14035
Re: Football department the priority for Tigers (Age)
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2009, 07:52:26 PM »
Spot on jake. great article.

There is a reason why we have toothpicks still running around at our club its because not enough $$$ is spent on that department.

Compare our cubs minus rance to some of the cubs playing at Collingwood and Eagles. Kids playing against men we are

Teams throw us around like punching bags and almost defeat us in the tackle count in every game because of this very reason.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Football department the priority for Tigers (Age)
« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2009, 07:48:26 AM »

Fitness staff would be one area that hasn't changed much from Spud's time. When we have a side that can only play at the right intensity for two quarters max then strength and conditioning should be near the top of the list for review.

Agree.   :thumbsup

Offline blaisee

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Football department the priority for Tigers (Age)
« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2009, 08:36:24 AM »
whoever coaches the tigers next year is going to have a football department that is well resourced, that is for sure.

We will have a competitive recruiting network, a full list of development coaches and a re-vamped medical staff, and extrra $1m will go intio the football depratment next year to add on to the extra $1m spent last year.

Whether the right people are in the right positions is another matter entirely of course ;) but it is a good start.

We will also have facilities on par if not better than any oither club in the AFL.

Lets hope the board have the wisdom to make decisions to the football department that are as good as the ones they have made off-field