Author Topic: BEN COUSINS [merged]  (Read 214683 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95612
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #795 on: June 03, 2009, 05:19:08 AM »
Richmond's Ben Cousins fined $10,000 for finger
Mark Robinson | June 02, 2009 06:33pm

BEN Cousins' one-finger salute has cost him $2500 and another $7500 if he misbehaves again. Richmond last night imposed a $5000 fine but suspended $2500 until next year.

The AFL, after CEO Andrew Demetriou said the gesture was totally unnecessary and unwarranted, also dished out a $5000 suspended fine.

Was the fine fair? Join the debate by commenting below.

If Cousins reoffends in the next 12 months he will have to pay another $7500.

In a backflip, Cousins yesterday fully apologised for his "insulting gesture" to the changeroom's camera before last Saturday night's game against Fremantle at Subiaco.

The Tigers said his action was obscene.

"I met with the club this morning and have accepted their fine," Cousins said.

"I apologised for raising my finger and explained that it was not a gesture I ever thought would go to air.

"I hadn't seen the footage until Monday afternoon and wasn't aware of my facial expression. Once I viewed the footage I realised why the public, the AFL and the Richmond Football Club were offended by my actions."

Cousins also met the Tigers leadership group yesterday.

It's believed Cousins' lower salary - believed to be about $100,000 - was part of his submission yesterday.

He said he meant his gesture to be seen only by a friend he thought was working.

AFL football operations manager Adrian Anderson said last night Cousins' newspaper explanation - in the Herald Sun - was written before he had seen the footage and particularly his expression.

"He acknowledged he had not been contrite enough with this explanation . . . and wished to apologise for his actions," Anderson said.

He said the AFL had taken into account Richmond's fine, Cousins' apology and his explanation in fining him $5000.

Richmond's general manager of football, Craig Cameron, last night said: "This was a breach of our standards and that is why it was important that Ben apologised and was also fined.

"As far as we are concerned the issue has been addressed by the club. We have told Ben we were disappointed with his actions and we are all ready to move on."

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,25576686-19742,00.html

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95612
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #796 on: June 03, 2009, 05:20:57 AM »
AFL leaves Tigers to fine Cousins
Samantha Lane | June 3, 2009

RICHMOND, rather than the AFL, hit Ben Cousins with the one fine that he will definitely pay for his middle finger salute to television cameras on Saturday night.

Meanwhile the league — after tough talking at the time — was satisfied with the club's action yesterday and issued a fully suspended fine of $5000 that will hang over the 2005 Brownlow medallist for 12 months.

When he learned of the full circumstances yesterday it is understood that even league chief Andrew Demetriou, after being incensed by Cousins' actions, softened his stance.

After winning approval from the league, the Tigers issued Cousins with a $5000 fine — $2500 of which has been suspended for 12 months pending further misdemeanours.

Cousins offered a far more solemn response yesterday to the matter that only a day earlier he had found "quite humorous". Yet there was still a contradiction in his version of events.

"I met with the club this morning and have accepted their fine. I apologised for raising my finger and explained that it was not a gesture I ever thought would go to air," Cousins was quoted as saying in a statement released by Richmond last night.

"I hadn't seen the footage until yesterday (Monday) afternoon and wasn't aware of my facial expression. Once I viewed the footage I realised why the public, the AFL and the Richmond Football Club were offended by my actions."

Yet during Cousins' regular Monday breakfast radio slot on Nova — the recording of which was widely circulated to media on Monday — the presenters announced that Cousins was seeing the footage for the first time while he was speaking on air. When the radio hosts asked Cousins what his reflections were, he said: "What did it make me think? I thought it was still quite humorous, but I guess I'm somebody that doesn't find that offensive."

It's understood the vision of the incident was playing in the radio studio while Cousins was being interviewed.

AFL football operations manager Adrian Anderson took into consideration Cousins' statement yesterday that he did not see the replay of the event until Monday afternoon.

Richmond, meanwhile, said it took the player's account at face value.

Tigers football manager Craig Cameron said last night that the matter was settled and there would be no further action imposed on Cousins by the player leadership group.

Channel Ten has stood by its decision to broadcast the gesture. Cousins has said he jokingly made it in the hope that a friend of his who he said was freelancing for the channel that day might see it. He did not think it would go to air.

Channel Ten does not know who Cousins was referring to.

http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/rfnews/afl-leaves-tigers-to-fine-cousins/2009/06/02/1243708456370.html

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95612
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #797 on: June 03, 2009, 05:22:15 AM »
The real villain is Channel Ten
Greg Baum | June 3, 2009

IF BEN Cousins is to hang, at least let it be for a hanging offence. Cousins' gesture in flipping the bird, so-called, to an unmanned television camera in the Subiaco changerooms on Saturday night has gone to all the usual courts: the AFL, his club's leadership group, the media and public opinion.

One by one, the verdicts are coming in. The public's is indifference. The media's lacks its usual trenchancy. The leadership group's was a fine, you suspect for thoughtlessness as much as vulgarity, half-suspended anyway. The AFL's was a suspended fine.

Why? Because Cousins' action was shocking? No; if "flipping the bird" ever shocked, it does no longer. It is shocking only as a glimpse of frilly knickers was once called shocking, tut-tut shocking.

Because it was obscene? Hardly; the colloquialism "flipping the bird", in its very benign-ness, contradicts it. Because it was offensive? Only to whomever it was intended, and no one, not even Cousins, can say for sure who that was. Almost certainly, it was meant for no one in particular, but was a reaction, mindless and reflexive, to the camera itself. Yet, selectively, some have chosen to take offence anyway.

Why? Because Cousins is a role model? Yes he is, for better or worse, and he has been both.

It is fair enough that role models are held to higher standards, not fair if those standards are impossible, not to every-waking-minute consciousness of all sensitivities and every innocent.

Because, from the AFL's point of view, it does not want to be seen to be licensing even a hint of the laxity that allowed Cousins to embarrass it and the game previously? Almost certainly.

Because Cousins has become an easy target? Incontestably. And it means some of his assailants have as much of a schoolyard mentality as his.

Actually, it is not Cousins' gesture that ought to be at issue here, but the airing of it. If it was immediately before a game, or immediately afterwards, Cousins could reasonably expect the camera to be operating, perhaps live. But this was nearly two hours before the game. It was not live, and would not have come to light at all except that someone at Channel Ten spotted it, and someone else thought to telecast it, after the game and out of context, gratuitously.

This, far more calculated and devious than Cousins' own action, was the real mischief. You only had to see the demeanour of the on-air presenters to know it; they were embarrassed.

So should Channel Ten be. A lifetime spent in press boxes tells me that Channel Ten would not have to search too far through its own archives to find examples of its own people in unguarded moments in front of non-live cameras, picking their noses, scratching their backsides or preening themselves narcissistically in the reflection from the lens. Other than at Christmas parties, they are excused their distractedness and vanities. But they did not spare Cousins.

Underlying, there is another issue. A footballer's world is privileged, but also exposed, on the field and off. The one sanctuary, apart from home, is the changeroom. Almost certainly, a scan of the unedited footage from Saturday night would show some players wearing nothing more than ankle bandages and an air of insouciance, but these were not telecast, of course.

Television cameras provide a fascinating insight into the mien and mood in this sanctuary, but it is only fair that they are used discreetly. On Saturday night, Cousins was indiscreet, but Channel Ten was brazen.

It says something of the balance of power in modern football that the AFL took the player to task, not the broadcaster.

http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/rfnews/the-real-villain-is-channel-ten/2009/06/02/1243708456373.html

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #798 on: June 03, 2009, 08:46:42 AM »
$10 k for showing his finger hahaha whats this world coming too. AFL football is a joke
unfit parents & children bashers get less, killer drink drivers get back on roads & pedophiles get protected & looked after by the tax payers for life.
How can anyone be find for something like that that you see in everyday life
If l was Ben Cousins l would become a porn star after football,  my god the way they follow him around l would get a court order put on the media for harrassment & invasion of privacy sitting outside his home & another for stalking, whatever happened to the law of stalking
l wonder how much he get find for showing his whoopy
This now means if someone gives you the finger that you are able to have them charged & sue them for what exactly
Channel Ten & the media get away with so much rubbish. AFL players need to make a stand on fines handed out as they are over the top, The AFL have become so greedy they donot care about the game of football or the fans
Yet they scream for volenteers to help promote the game gee they make me so angry then 2 A's

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95612
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #799 on: June 04, 2009, 02:47:01 AM »
Thumbs are down, Ben Cousins
Rebecca Wilson | June 04, 2009

BEN Cousins has caused all of us to do more soul-searching than any AFL footballer of his, or anyone else's, era.

He is infuriating, impossibly handsome, troubled, talented and extremely flawed.

Cousins has done more than any other athlete to alienate himself from his fans.

We know the history, yet even knowing it and hating what he has done, few of us wished him anything but success and inner peace.

Thousands of fans turned out to watch his every pre-season move as he prepared to return to football with Richmond.

We sighed collectively when he was injured in his first game.

After that, we were relieved to only read of him in the back pages - just another injured footballer in the right kind of rehab.

It should be pointed out that Sydneysiders have never had much sympathy for him and howled down those (including me) who thought he should be given another chance.

Jaded Sydney is over football brats who squander second chances.

Talent is not a consideration north of Melbourne because we have learned the hard way that if you give these ratbags a break, they will screw you in the end.

It is a tough town and Cousins proved this week their theory is probably right.

He has let everyone down by biting every single hand that fed him.

As my dear old grandmother would have said, he has killed the goose that lays the golden egg.

Cousins has contempt for everyone around him. With one foul gesture, he told us so.

The look in his eyes was of a lout who is so smug about his place in the world he doesn't need anyone outside his dubious ring of "friends".

These are the same superb advisers who guided him into the darkness of what we thought was a life put behind him.

He is not sorry. He is not contrite. He doesn't give a toss.

He has forgotten the one last chance the Tigers gave him, as well as the outpouring of love from a stream of young fans who obviously adore him.

His pathetic reason for his actions would make a parent weep.

Not only does he show no remorse, but he cites a feeble excuse in a weak statement.

He gave the finger to a mate in the broadcast box - he didn't think it would be broadcast to the wider population.

Give me a break, Ben, and go to your room.

Those who believe this is an over-reaction need only cast their minds back to the sight of him shirtless on a Perth street in broad daylight - and apparently beyond help.

Year after year of turning a blind eye to Cousins and his West Coast Eagles mates resulted in the undoing of a champion.

But he came back - with a hell of a lot of help: stints in rehabilitation, a move east and a new club.

It was all coming up Cousins as the public gradually grew used to seeing him working hard to play football again.

Luminaries such as Kevin Sheedy said the Tigers should give him a chance - and they did.

He has given very little in this comeback season.

Heads were bowed as he limped off on his suspect hamstrings in week one.

Since then, he has been out with various injuries and we have seen only glimmers of the once-great champion from the West Coast.

Still, most long-suffering Tigers fans were happy to wait for the 31-year-old to find his way back at his pace.

The finger at the camera was soul-destroying for the faithful and those among us who love a happy ending to a tragic story.

All we want is for Ben Cousins to be good again.

That means good in every way - not just on the field.

As a mum, I am angry.

His mum should be, too.

His family has stuck by him and deserves an apology from the son about whom they must have some real doubts.

As a commentator, I was wrong (I thought this would all come up roses for Cousins).

This is not just one stupid gesture - it is a reflection of the sort of person Cousins is and how little he cares about what anybody thinks.

Above all, his club should be seriously miffed. He has lost his right to more chances and should be sent to play in a suburban park for the rest of the season.

There won't be any cameras in the cold dressing sheds, no screaming fans at every training session and no medical staff to rub down the suspect legs.

The Tigers are a proud old club and deserve a lot more than a mug who proved on the weekend that he just doesn't get it.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25582994-5000117,00.html

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95612
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #800 on: June 07, 2009, 05:04:36 AM »
Let's give issues balance
Eddie McGuire | June 07, 2009

ONCE upon a time there was a notion that in society there was one rule for footballers and another for everyone else.

In those days the assumption was that footballers got away with indiscretions because the media lay dead on the story, the police would look the other way and clubs would go out of their way to cover up the wayward behaviour.

Correct back then, but not any more.

These days footballers are held above community standards.

That is understandable, given that footballers are lectured and drilled constantly on appropriate behaviour, reminded about the number of examples of dumb acts going wrong from which to learn and the fact that players are getting paid well for their performances on and off the field.

Also, it is a fact that so many children look up to their footy heroes that, like it or not, a star player will have an impact on them one way or another.

The vexed proposition for many is just because a man plays a sport that is popular, why is there so much focus, at the exclusion of others, on them being the moral guardians of our young?

Unlike politicians, footballers are chosen because of their ability to catch and kick a ball.

The added responsibility comes because of the game's position in society as well as the media fascination on them, particularly in this town.

Politicians, however, put themselves up for public election, campaigning in most cases that they have a stronger moral compass than most and therefore are in the position to decide what policies should rule our lives.

So when two federal Liberal politicians, Alby Schultz and Chris Pearce, conducted a "party room brawl" during the week, where was the outrage from the media and the community?

Yes, it picked up some publicity - the Herald Sun ran the story on page 18 - but nothing like two footballers involved in a fight.

Forget this happened in a parliamentary Liberal Party meeting - not in the middle of a football match or an organised boxing bout.

This was not some early morning, alcohol-fuelled "stink". This was between two middle-aged, presumably sober leaders in our community, operating with the public meter ticking, helping decide which way Her Majesty's Opposition would formulate policy to save us all from ourselves.

By contrast, the normal training regime of a boxing match between teammates dominated the back page of the Herald Sun on Thursday and was a major talking point when Melbourne's boom recruit, Jack Watts, admitted copping a few on the beak when he and Brock McLean "duked it out" in the boxing ring at training.

Remember pre-season when Carlton's Setanta O'hAlipin whacked and then kicked teammate Cameron Cloke?

That outrage and the sanction from the club and a tribunal appearance dominated talk for weeks.

Yet two politicians have a barney and, so long as they apologise to each other, everything is kosher?

Where's the press conference and the public whipping from the media?

The Canberra media gallery wouldn't last five minutes among the football reporting pack on that evidence.

Unlike Ben Cousins, the politicians were able to conduct their business without television cameras shooting their every move.

Cousins copped a club-imposed fine and an AFL suspended sentence during the week for "giving the bird" to the Channel 10 camera locked on the Richmond change rooms a couple of hours before his return match at Subiaco Oval, his old home, last weekend.

What was going through Cousins' head at the time to do such a provocative thing is anyone's guess, but the idea of having these cameras in these positions is to give us viewers a fly-on-the-wall voyeuristic peek at the inner workings and build-up to games.

On other occasions we have seen players throwing balls on to walls to sharpen their reflexes, others pacing the floor and yelling encouragement to heighten their arousal levels before battle, others doing yoga, listening to music or even players grappling with assistant coaches.

The idea being people prepare in all manner of different ways.

That Cousins "flipped the bird" was not really offensive. What it showed me as an armchair psychologist was that Cousins was very much of the mindset before that game of "stuff you all, I'll show you".

Revenge as motivation is one of the greatest emotions in the human existence.

Far from being offended, I was fascinated by Cousins' belligerent mindset. There is nothing wrong with that - going into a tough, physical, highly emotional game as he was, playing in front of his home town and preparing to do so with a broken hand.

You just don't stroll out on the ground and hope to get a kick.

The next question was: Should Channel 10 have shown the pictures?

Of course they should. That is the reason the cameras are there.

They are not hidden. Everyone knows they are on. The whole idea is to give us an insight inside the change rooms and the build-up to the game good, bad or indifferent.

Channel 10 did exactly as it ought to. It didn't censor and it reported accurately the state of mind of a player who was one of the major stories of the night.

And that should have been the end of it.

Unfortunately the do-gooders all ran around in circles until we had Cousins, Channel 10, Richmond Football Club and the AFL in such a tizz that fines and suspended sentences and apologies and spin were bouncing off the walls.

Let's just tell it as it is: Cousins was in a mood to take on the world, Channel 10 picked up vision that any media organisation would kill for and we were afforded the privilege of being inside the inner sanctum.

It's a bit like all the moral outrage about Watts' boxing match.

These things happen. Get over it.

If that's going to outrage parents across the nation and stop them from letting little Johnny play football, then better now than later.

Football, in any code, is a tough, uncompromising game.

As much as the junior grades are rightly sanitised with no tackling and kicking-off-the-ground rules even at the very early grades of the game, kids quickly find out there is nowhere to hide.

That is the game's great challenge - a test of skill, temperament, will and courage. It is a fantastic game, but can we enjoy it for what it is, not what a committee may want it to be?

So in a week where politicians continued to disgrace themselves for little more than a stern look from their colleagues, where other so-called role models and popular teen drama actors ran into one of life's many road humps, where the ABC's half-baked apology for The Chaser's appalling taste made the so-called North Melbourne "Chickengate" video look like a Disney movie by comparison with its cynical attempt to outrage, footballers again played the role of "red herring".

Two years ago tomorrow a Collingwood footballer had a disastrous night out with a bikie. It would appear some did not learn from his experiences as a role model.

People of all persuasions muck up. Maybe it's time to judge them on their merits rather than the generated hysteria and sociological sub-set to which they belong.

Either that, or it's about time the footy media went to Canberra.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25597726-5000117,00.html

Offline Jacosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
  • No bish fish, the moon wasnt right.
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #801 on: June 07, 2009, 09:05:53 PM »
Holy cow did Eddie get some the night before he wrote this, when i saw his name at the top of the article i was expecting something more in the lines of Rebecca Wilson's waffle.  It was surprisingly acurate and even handed with not one hint of him bagging the Tigers or blowing Collingwoods horn. Then compare it to the chaser's lack of taste and the new soft drink released with the name Cocaine.  Is the scrutiny on footballers really coming to such a point that something as simple as flipping the bird outweighs these other (i would say) less tasteful or more outrages articles. 

Although i would like to have seen the reaction of Ben's gesture if it was done by another player for example Browny or Richo, i would put money on it that nothing would have come of it.  

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95612
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #802 on: June 11, 2009, 05:26:42 AM »
Richardson: Cousins about to peak
10/06/2009 6:36 PM
Paul Gough
Sportal

Ben Cousins is just showing signs of hitting his peak form just as he is about to face his former club West Coast for the first time.

That was the word from Richmond veteran Matthew Richardson, ahead of Cousins' eagerly awaited first showdown with the club where he made his name - at Etihad Stadium on Saturday night.

Full article at:
http://sportal.com.au/AFL-news-display/cousins-about-to-peak-71991


Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95612
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #803 on: June 13, 2009, 02:45:49 PM »
Fresh face of Tigers wants Ben on board
13th June 2009, 6:00 WST
 
Richmond’s brightest young star Trent Cotchin has urged the Tigers to offer Ben Cousins a contract for next year, claiming the 2005 Brownlow medallist has had a massive impact in his short time at the club.
   
With hype surrounding Cousins’ first clash against his former West Coast teammates tonight at Etihad Stadium at fever pitch in Melbourne, Cotchin said the recovering drug addict had taken on a key leadership role at Punt Road.
   
The 19-year-old, Richmond’s No. 2 pick in the 2007 draft, spoke out on behalf of Cousins after caretaker coach Jade Rawlings dumped five experienced players for his first match in charge of the Tigers.
   
It is understood Cousins, 30, is considering a push for a contract extension past his one-year deal.
   
Cotchin said Cousins’ form, despite being hampered by recent hamstring and hand injuries, proved he had plenty to offer.
   
“Definitely,” Cotchin said bluntly when asked if he thought Cousins should play on next year.
   
“He has such an impact on the group and the team structures, so why wouldn’t you want someone of that ability in your team and he is all about the team. If you can get a lot of players with the same sort of ideas that he has, it’s going to make the team play for each other a lot more.
   
“What he does shows that he’s one of the best players the game has seen and let’s just hope he can keep on going.”
   
Rawlings refused to be drawn on whether he thought Cousins should be offered a new contract.

http://www.thewest.com.au/default.aspx?MenuID=12&ContentID=147822

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95612
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #804 on: June 14, 2009, 01:55:17 AM »
Learning the hard way
Ben Cousins | June 13, 2009

FROM the moment I walked in the door as a 17-year-old to the day I unfortunately and sadly departed the West Coast Eagles, my time there gave me wonderful memories and friends, as well as the well-documented problems.

There are so many stories, games and moments washed with periods of exhilaration and frustration.

My career at West Coast revolved around always giving everything for the team.

I was brought up with the philosophy that in team sport you should never leave anything on the field.

When I look back, perhaps that manifested itself from the way I played the game to the way I lived my life.

That said, my greatest and overwhelming memory of West Coast is that when I ran out on to the ground and looked around, I had supreme confidence in the blokes I played with, and in myself.

The energy of the impending confrontation would course through my veins. That was one of my addictions.

I hope my hyper-focus was evident on the field because that's how I played and tried to take that to a new level when I led the side.

I don't look back with any bitterness towards the club for the way it ended, but I wish it could have been different.

I accept that I was somebody who had to learn life's lessons the hard way and my final day as a West Coast player is still etched in my memory. That was October '07 and from then to now, life has moved quickly.

I was lucky at West Coast to have had two coaches of the great character of Mick Malthouse and John Worsfold.

Mick was my first coach and a hard taskmaster. I'm certain my career was greatly enhanced by four years with him.

When he left West Coast he gave me a handwritten letter that was full of advice and encouragement for my future. I could not have asked for a better coach and person to start my career.

In due course, John became my coach and he was enormous to me.

I have nothing but good things to say about John and -- through the good and bad -- he has been a big support and a bigger friend.

We've had discussions since I left and sometimes I wonder what John thinks about what happened. Maybe through some misunderstandings, maybe he thinks I let him down. Maybe sometimes I did.

But he knows that every time I ran out representing myself, him and the club, I gave absolutely everything I had.

For me, it was all about what happened on game day and getting ready for the game. It was about performing at a sustained level of fierce desire and want. To never say die. To never, ever think "what if".

And when it all came crashing down, it was the same theme. The parallels were enormous.

John and I have spoken about it. And I hope he understands.

When John walked back in the door at West Coast in 2002, he represented all the greatness of times past.

To work closely with John and see a side transform and build to a point where we got that supreme confidence was, to me, what footy is all about.

We were a very talented side, but talent doesn't give you supreme confidence. It's the reliability of knowing blokes will rock in every week and work hard. And when that happens the talent comes into play. But what comes first -- the talent or the hard work?

I spent a year out of the game. I'm now playing for Richmond, and West Coast is a different team to the one I left.

There's still familiarity, but there's a whole new generation coming through and they are moving in the right direction.

Today I will never forget the support I had from West Coast members and fans. Deep down I hope they remember the good times as well as the bad.

Tonight's game is significant, no doubt, but Round 22 over there looms as an important date, too.

Questions about West Coast have dogged me all week.

But I believe too much reflection causes complacency. Doesn't it?

I try not to look back. The way the game was instilled in me, I am always looking to improve.

Still, I grew up at that footy club -- some would argue I didn't -- and no one can escape the past.

When I look back as a player I think of three phases.

The first was when I came to the club and caught the tail end of that great era that produced the 1992 and 1994 premiership teams.

From the age of 17 to 21, it was a privilege to play with Mainwaring, Worsfold, McKenna, Matera, Kemp, Head, Lewis, Tony Evans. The list goes on.

I played in finals and my football experience at that time for me was invaluable and exciting.

On the back of that, as an emerging player, I reluctantly took on a leadership role at a club that was struggling. A treasured memory I have at West Coast is sharing the captaincy with Dean Kemp.

Footballers and blokes don't come any better than him.

We were young, rebuilding and on the end of frequent beltings.

As part of my overall football experience, it taught me plenty. Good sides don't just arrive, don't suddenly wake up and perform.

To go through those hard years and to play a role in the development of that side and see it rebuild into a powerhouse was satisfying.

The premiership, of course, was the pinnacle.

The Grand Final loss the year before, when I was 27, was shattering.

It had taken me a decade to make the final day and we lost it. It was one or two points at the end, I really don't know, I've never watched the game.

I was gutted. I knew we weren't guaranteed to make it the next year because the game is too cut-throat and I thought the loss might've been the closest we got to the ultimate.

In no way did winning the Grand Final the next year make me complacent, but as I look back, with everything that has happened, it would have haunted me if we hadn't won one.

It was always going to be a tough year, to back up after the Grand Final loss, and when the indiscretions came along, such as losing the captaincy, it created even more motivation for me. Indeed, It drove me all year.

When I think about West Coast I don't think about losing the captaincy. If it's mentioned, I think, 'Oh, yeah that happened'. I know that might appear unusual but that's how it is.

The premiership gave me, and the blokes, enormous satisfaction.

No matter how high profile some players were, we knew each player was as important as the next. We had the brilliance of Judd, Kerr and Cox, some of the acts of Daniel Chick in the Grand Final were game-changing, as were some of the hardness and spoils of Beau Waters.

There was Adam Hunter, Andrew Embley, Tyson Stenglein, Wirrpanda and an overall honest work rate from everyone.

At the presentation, John called me up to join him and Juddy on the podium and I enjoyed every second of it.

Yeah, I lost the captaincy and Juddy was up there as skipper, but it did not worry me. We had just won a flag and I was stoked and as happy as I've been in my life. And not just me. All the players and officials and fans.

The fans continue to be fantastic and I find their support humbling. I can't begin to say what it means to me. I worked my guts out for that club and I got it in return.

It's been well documented it was a transitional period of my life and, to be honest, I reckon a lot of fans will probably blink and say, 'Gee, Cousins is playing at Richmond, doesn't life move quickly'. That's how life happens.

Overall, I hope people look back and think the good outweighed the bad at West Coast.

Tonight, my journey continues, as does theirs.

They are moving in the right direction and, hopefully, the same can be said of me.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,25627587-19742,00.html

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58062
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #805 on: June 14, 2009, 05:44:57 AM »
Nothing new but Benny just knows what to do right on a footy field and the more gametime he's getting as his fitness improves the more he's showing he hasn't lost it. As long as his hammies hold he'll be back next year for sure.

Btw funny as when the Eagle supporters started to boo Cuz in the last quarter and we kept kicking it to him just to tick them off even further  :lol. It probably wasn't but it looked like the other boys were deliberately trying to find him once the booing started. Kerr giving away that 50m was just icing on the cake :rollin.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline julzqld

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3876
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #806 on: June 14, 2009, 08:14:38 AM »
Did you see Cuz smile at the camera in the changerooms?

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #807 on: June 14, 2009, 11:20:11 AM »
Properly managed he could play atleast 3 years.

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #808 on: June 14, 2009, 11:22:40 AM »
should be an automatic selction in the leadership group next year.
whats more important, he has embraced the club :gotigers

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: BEN COUSINS [merged]
« Reply #809 on: June 14, 2009, 11:27:22 AM »
should be an automatic selction in the leadership group next year.
whats more important, he has embraced the club :gotigers

Brings professionalism and energy.  Showed why he deserved to be out there and the other "old" 5 didn't.  :thumbsup
EAT EM ALIVE!