moloney's weaknesses are there for all to see, another glass half full type, one good year and lol it's up on a pedestal
trying to get rid of plodders not add more good old richmond
Got that about right Gerks. 
yeah i thought so
hhhaaarrrrggggghhhhh delusional as usual.
just assume i cant see his weaknesses. have the balls to list his weaknesses after all your the one potting him.
ya know i can honestly say when i have a go at our players i make it very clear why. go look at the rance thread for example. blanket statements dont cut it with me usually its an attempt to cover up ignorance. cmon have the courage to list what you think are his weaknesses. im happy to list what hes done well.
lol only one good yr eh. that sort of says just how much you have looked at moloney.you should at least do some homework in this area before making such ill informed comments.
just a little heads up.
in the 4 yrs prior to this yr, which i agree 2012 was a poor yr but good reasons why. moloney was very good indeed. every bit as good as foley when fit, and had almost as much injury in 06 07 with a groin that in the end had to be operated on and 08 shoulder.. he manged just 25 games in those 3 yrs. but hey from now on when criticising our players i wont be letting injury be an excuse. lets cut foley hes a hack and done nothing for how many yrs.
in those yrs 08 only played 8 games in the first half of the yr due to busting his shoulder and missing the rest of the yr, 09 10 11 fully fit hes averaged 24 possesions a game so hes certainly managed to find the ball both inside and out . his defensive pressure and workrate is shown by the fact he layed close to 5 tackles a game in that time frame so he not only got the ball he worked damn hard with out it. he uses the ball well and he goes and gets it. contested possesion na we dont want players who do that lol. makes good decisions and is as tough as nails.may not be the quickest bloke going around but hes not slow. he not only has good hands in close but can get out on his own. that will do for starters.
while your listing all those weaknesses how about you tell us which mids we have that are better than moloney atm. after all the club has said we need more mids.
all i have asked is why did we not go after moloney who without doubt was the best mature mid availble to any club in the f/a trade period.
i have asked why not when we have shown a preparedness to take 5 mature players aged between 24 and 31. so age definately was not a factor. was a two yr contract unreasonable hell no. is his contract unreasonable reportedly 350k a season definately not. not when the average contract is close to 300k a season it could be more. was attitude a problem well we took edwards so they cant have been too worried about attitude. we took knights who has come off some very quite yrs yet moloney has only really had one quite yr that being 2012 at a club he clearly no longer wanted to be at.
i ask why not when they themselves have constantly said we need decent mids. but apparently moloney is a hack talk about delusional and blinkered. hes not a richmond player he must be no good. the club didnt go after him he must be no good. thats exactly how you defenders of all things richmond come across.
i ask these things because imo they did not do enough to fix the ruck problems, we have tall forward problems and didnt take one tall forward who like ruckmen take time to develop,
we have not gone close to addressing the dearth of midfielders in particular. yet finals are the goal or arent they. hence i ask could we have done better and should we have done better.
its the off season, just after all drafts have finished. now should be the time to discuss what we have done and how well we have done.
now is the time to ask why or why not.
but hey lets not have threads that actually mean we may have to question what they have done. nope we cant have that.
its the same every yr the same people defending everything and anything unquestioningly.
