Our draft picks - 2nd round and later picks will be pushed back

[tony_montana]

1. GC
2. GC
3. GC
4. WCE
5. GC
6. Rich
7. GC
8. Ess
9. GC
10. Bris
11. GC
12. Melb
13. GC
14. Adel
15. GC
16. Port
17. North
18. Geel (Ablett compo)
19. Carl
20. Haw
21. Freo
22. Syd
23. WB
24. Geel
25. Geel (Ablett compo)
26. St K/Coll
27. Coll/St K
28. Bris (Rischitelli compo)
29. Adel (Bock compo)
30. Port (Krakouer compo)
31. Haw (Brown compo)
32. WB (Harbrow compo)
33. WCE (priority pick)
34. GC
35. WCE
36. Rich  
....
53. Rich
...
70. Rich

I thought the Cats picks would look something like the above??

So if the Cats choose to use the picks in 2012 and they, for example, finish last, They would have 1, 2 (compo) and a compo pick before the team that finished 8th.

I also would have thought that the Eagles having a 2nd round priority pick, it wouldn't be before the first round compo picks.

That's how i read it wayne.

they get a mid 1st round pick and then another one AFTER their 1st round pick, they'd be silly to use these this or next draft

[Con65]

I agree with you Scarface

[mightytiges]

I've checked the AFL site and yep I was wrong about the first of Geelong's compo first round picks. It's meant to be alongside Geelong's normal first rounder (24 if used this year). So wayne you're right with Geelong having picks 24 & 25.

One of the selections can be taken after Geelong’s usual first-round pick (dependant of ladder position), while the other will be placed in the middle of the first round regardless of where the Cats finish on the ladder.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/103436/default.aspx

[mightytiges]

1. GC
2. GC
3. GC
4. WCE
5. GC
6. Rich
7. GC
8. Ess
9. GC
10. Bris
11. GC
12. Melb
13. GC
14. Adel
15. GC
16. Port
17. North
18. Geel (Ablett compo)
19. Carl
20. Haw
21. Freo
22. Syd
23. WB
24. Geel
25. Geel (Ablett compo)
26. St K/Coll
27. Coll/St K
28. Bris (Rischitelli compo)
29. Adel (Bock compo)
30. Port (Krakouer compo)
31. Haw (Brown compo)
32. WB (Harbrow compo)
33. WCE (priority pick)
34. GC
35. WCE
36. Rich  
....
53. Rich
...
70. Rich

I also would have thought that the Eagles having a 2nd round priority pick, it wouldn't be before the first round compo picks.

Yeah I wasn't sure if the Eagles priority pick was a post-first rounder or a pre-second rounder if that makes sense. I've checked the compensation the Dogs received for Harbrow and it says end of round one so I think you've got the right draft order above wayne  .

In any case what this all means is our 2nd pick has dropped down to 36 (effectively a 3rd round pick in a normal draft) and we'll only have 2 picks inside the top 50 if we don't trade for more picks. That's going to really limit the number of delistings we'll be able to make this year. Picks 6 and 36 will only replace retirees Cuz and Simmo. So delistings like Jordie, Thomson and Polo will end up being replaced by late picks 53, 70 and 87/PSD. Hardly a guarantee we'll improve our list with genuine quality via those late picks . We really need to trade for more early (1st/2nd round) picks or this is going to be a lean draft for us.

Now where are all the anti-tankers who said winning a couple of extra games in the second half of the past two seasons was more important than gaining priority picks. Nah missing out on an extra pick inside the top 20 last year and an extra pick inside the top 5 this year doesn't hinder or even hurt our list rebuilding .

[Smokey]

Nah missing out on an extra pick inside the top 20 last year and an extra pick inside the top 5 this year doesn't hinder or even hurt our list rebuilding .

No it doesn't.  And stop hitting your head on that brickwall - it will hurt after a while.   

[mightytiges]

Nah missing out on an extra pick inside the top 20 last year and an extra pick inside the top 5 this year doesn't hinder or even hurt our list rebuilding .

No it doesn't.  And stop hitting your head on that brickwall - it will hurt after a while.   

lol

Missing out on the free chance to add two more talented kids more likely these days found at the higher end of the draft while at the same time being restricted to replacing our delistings with mostly speculative late picks doesn't matter. Silly me 

[Fluffy Tiger]

fluffy i dont think that is right...

see: http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/3aw-football-blog/afls-compensation-for-geelong/20100929-15x7e.html

it is at the end of round 1 if they use it this year...

Thanks for that. I am much happier with that comp but if I was a Geelong supporter I would not be happy. I will also add that we dont seem to have lost anybody to the gold coast yet, that might get us a extra pick if that happens.

[one-eyed]

wayne posted this link in the National Draft order thread.

http://www.afl.com.au/portals/0/2010/2010_nab_afl_draft_order.pdf

Here's what the draft order would be if all the compo picks are used in this year's draft.

1. GC
2. GC
3. GC
4. WCE
5. GC
6. Rich
7. GC
8. Ess
9. GC
10. Bris
11. GC
12. Melb
13. GC
14. Adel
15. GC
16. Port
17. North
18. Carl
19. Haw
20. Freo
21. Syd
22. WB
23. Geel
24. St K
25. Coll
26. WCE (priority pick)
27. Geel (Ablett compo)
28. Geel (Ablett compo)
29. Bris (Rischitelli compo)
30. Adel (Bock compo)
31. Haw (Brown compo)
32. WB (Harbrow compo)

33. GC
34. WCE
35. Rich  
36. Ess
37. Bris
38. Melb
39. Adel
40. Port
41. Port (Krakouer compo)
42. North
43. Carl
44. Haw
....
53. Rich
...
70. Rich
...
87. Rich

[yellowandback]

Nah missing out on an extra pick inside the top 20 last year and an extra pick inside the top 5 this year doesn't hinder or even hurt our list rebuilding .

No it doesn't.  And stop hitting your head on that brickwall - it will hurt after a while.   

lol


Missing out on the free chance to add two more talented kids more likely these days found at the higher end of the draft while at the same time being restricted to replacing our delistings with mostly speculative late picks doesn't matter. Silly me 

Thats because the National Draft was developed by the AFL as a money making exercise to increase the TV rights.

Not to help struggling clubs re-build their playing lists in a sporting act of socialism.

[Penelope]

please explain?

[yellowandback]

please explain?

just throwing in a theory about why we have a drafting system if it isn't used to help struggling clubs to rebuild their playing list.

[jackstar is back again]

Nah missing out on an extra pick inside the top 20 last year and an extra pick inside the top 5 this year doesn't hinder or even hurt our list rebuilding .

No it doesn't.  And stop hitting your head on that brickwall - it will hurt after a while.   

lol


Missing out on the free chance to add two more talented kids more likely these days found at the higher end of the draft while at the same time being restricted to replacing our delistings with mostly speculative late picks doesn't matter. Silly me 

Thats because the National Draft was developed by the AFL as a money making exercise to increase the TV rights.

Not to help struggling clubs re-build their playing lists in a sporting act of socialism.

Most idiototic suggestion I have ever read

[yellowandback]

Nah missing out on an extra pick inside the top 20 last year and an extra pick inside the top 5 this year doesn't hinder or even hurt our list rebuilding .

No it doesn't.  And stop hitting your head on that brickwall - it will hurt after a while.   

lol


Missing out on the free chance to add two more talented kids more likely these days found at the higher end of the draft while at the same time being restricted to replacing our delistings with mostly speculative late picks doesn't matter. Silly me 

Thats because the National Draft was developed by the AFL as a money making exercise to increase the TV rights.

Not to help struggling clubs re-build their playing lists in a sporting act of socialism.

Most idiototic suggestion I have ever read

I'm taking the pee. idjit.

[one-eyed]

Including all the compo picks except the Gold Coast held ones which will be kept for future drafts.....

We'll have picks  6, 29, 34, 51, 55, 69, 86, 103, etc....


Full list:
http://oneeyed-richmond.com/forum//index.php?topic=11884.0

1. GC
2. GC
3. GC
4. WCE
5. Bris
6. Rich
7. GC
8. Ess
9. GC
10. GC
11. GC
12. Melb
13. GC
14. Adel
15. Geel
16. Port
17. North
18. Carl
19. Haw
20. Freo
21. Syd
22. WB (F/S)
23. Geel
24. St K
25. Coll
26. WCE (priority pick)
27. Geel (Ablett compo)
28. Bris (Rischitelli compo)
29. Rich (Bock compo)
30. North (Brown compo)
31. Bris (Harbrow compo)
32. Bris
33. WCE
34. Rich
35. Ess
36. Bris
37. Melb
38. Carl
39. Port
40. Port
41. Geel
42. Haw
43. GC
44. Syd
45. WB (F/S)
46. Carl
47. Geel
48. Freo
49. Coll
50. Coll
51. Rich
52. Ess
53. GC
54. Melb
55. Rich
...
69. Rich
...
86. Rich