Author Topic: AFL's next TV rights deal [merged]  (Read 2023 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98034
    • One-Eyed Richmond
AFL's next TV rights deal [merged]
« on: February 18, 2014, 04:07:53 AM »
The AFL's broadcasting rights could be worth $1.6b in 2016

    Jon Pierik
    The Age
    February 18, 2014


A leading media analyst predicts the next AFL broadcast rights contract will be worth up to $1.6 billion, as the league moved to beef up its intricate knowledge of the media by appointing former News Corp chief Kim Williams to its board.

Williams, a Port Adelaide supporter, has replaced Rio Tinto boss Chris Lynch, who is based in London, on the nine-member board.

The current $1.25 billion, five-year broadcast rights deal with Seven West Media (Channel Seven), Foxtel and Telstra does not expire until after the 2016 season but talks are likely to accelerate later this year.

The AFL had already strengthened its broadcasting knowledge, securing former Foxtel executive Peter Campbell last year to head its AFL Media division.

Williams was in charge at News Corp when Foxtel brokered its most recent deal with the AFL. He had previously been chief executive of Foxtel for a decade.

Roger Colman, an experienced research analyst with CCZ Stratton Equities, would not rule out a new broadcasting deal reaching $2 billion but said it was more likely to fall short. ''I gave 5 per cent per annum on $1.25 billion, I got to between $1.5 billion and $1.6 billion. That's what I think it's worth even at a premium inflation rate compared with expected TV advertising growth,'' he said.

''[It includes] a premium inflation rate with sports rights, with a certainty of ratings and cross-promotional benefits and the fact it is 'tentpole' stuff that networks need relative to general advertising and product revenue availability.''

What could inflate the contract is if networks Nine and Ten join the bidding. Nine was not involved in discussions in 2011, while Ten initially wanted to retain the rights it had held since 2002 (initially with Nine and Foxtel) but pulled out because of financial problems.

However, with the value of live sport escalating, in part because it cannot be illegally downloaded, there are suggestions Ten, also buoyed by its ratings for the Big Bash League and the Sochi Winter Olympics, could be involved in a bid.

''We will look at any significant sport rights contract, as long as it makes economic sense for our business,'' Neil Shoebridge, Ten's director of corporate affairs, said on Monday.

Williams said on Monday that developments in the digital side of the business would be ''incredibly interesting''. His nomination was recommended by a sub-committee of Collingwood president Eddie McGuire, West Coast chairman Alan Cransberg, commissioner Linda Dessau and AFL chairman Mike Fitzpatrick.

The Australian Financial Review reported on Monday that Williams' appointment had an even deeper meaning, and was linked to the fierce behind-the-scenes battle between the AFL and the reporting of the Essendon supplements scandal by News Corp newspapers, the Herald Sun and The Australian.

''News Corp is perceived to have taken the side of suspended Essendon coach James Hird. After Mr Williams lost his reform battle at News against senior editorial executives Peter Blunden and Chris Mitchell, his appointment as an AFL commissioner is being seen as payback by AFL chief executive Andrew Demetriou,'' AFR columnist Joe Aston wrote.

Fitzpatrick and Williams, however, denied the claims.

''I'm quite perplexed by that,'' Williams said. ''I could actually construct it in quite a different way and say it arguably links the organisations through an intimate understanding on both sides.''

Fitzpatrick said ''Andrew had nothing to do with this appointment''.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/the-afls-broadcasting-rights-could-be-worth-16b-in-2016-20140217-32wex.html
« Last Edit: October 27, 2014, 07:52:45 PM by one-eyed »

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98034
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: AFL's next TV rights deal [merged]
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2014, 01:02:06 PM »
Ten set to be a player in AFL broadcast rights

   Jon Pierik
     The Age
    April 21, 2014



Channel Ten chief Hamish McLennan has confirmed the former AFL broadcaster shapes as a player in the next rights deal.

Ten shared the free-to-air rights with Nine and Foxtel between 2002 and 2006 and with Seven between 2007 and 2011, but opted to pull out of the latest deal, with Ten at the time interested more in securing the NRL rights.

That did not eventuate, leading to a falling out between then Ten chief executive Lachlan Murdoch and then News Corp Australia chief Kim Williams, the latter now an AFL commissioner.

Ten’s interest in the next round of AFL rights could help bump up the price.

"Yes, we’re keen. All depends on what is on offer," McLennan said.

Ten had televised two Saturday matches through the home-and-away season and had been involved in finals and the grand final.

Asked what slots Ten would be interested in, McLennan said: "Depends on price etc, but maybe Saturday again and what is on offer."

McLennan understands the importance of live sport to his hopes of resurrecting Ten’s stocks, with cricket’s Twenty20 Big Bash League and the Sochi Winter Olympics providing strong ratings, and a temporary lift in share price. Ten is also aware it needs a major winter sport to compete with Seven and Nine, the latter with the rights to the NRL.

The current five-year, $1.25 billion deal with Channel Seven, Foxtel and Telstra expires after the 2016 season. Discussions on a new deal are expected to intensify later this year.

AFL general manager of broadcasting Simon Lethlean has said the league’s preference would be to secure a deal by late next year.

Leading media analyst Roger Colman, an experienced research analyst with CCZ Stratton Equities, has not ruled out a new broadcasting deal reaching $2 billion but said it was more likely to fall short.

The AFL is also considering producing its own coverage and showing matches exclusively on its own website. However, former AFL commissioner Graeme Samuel, now an NRL commissioner, has warned sports they could jeopardise hopes of securing greater riches should they bypass networks and deal directly with viewers.

Collingwood president Eddie McGuire has also warned the AFL that it needs to preserve and enhance the number of blockbusters, ensuring the networks of strong ratings and, in return, a more lucrative deal for the AFL. He has also warned of the threat the NRL, and Samuel, pose.

"Out there is rugby league land, where Graeme Samuel has got all of our IP (intellectual property), and is now a commissioner on their board, they are going big time. They are going after us," McGuire said on SEN.

"That is why night grand finals and these big games have to be big, because we have to have something to go to the TV rights holders and say, 'This is why you have to pay $140 million next year, not $125 million'.

"And, if you have a look at last year, the last one, I reckon we left probably $20 million on the table. So, we don’t want to be doing that a second time."

Williams’ recent addition to the AFL commission has been viewed as the AFL improving its knowledge of the media landscape.

Former Nine boss Jeff Browne, a long time friend and associate of McGuire’s, has long been mentioned also as a possible commissioner.

"I was on the last selection panel and Jeff’s name was mentioned there. It wasn’t a situation that he was able to put his name in the frame for because of his business and personal situation at the time," McGuire said.

"But Jeff is a bloke who has tremendous credentials to fill the job. Why wouldn’t you get someone who has been involved in every major television decision for rights, probably going back to the mid ’80s. He wrote the AFL rules, he knew what the AFL rules were about."

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/ten-set-to-be-a-player-in-afl-broadcast-rights-20140421-zqx7x.html

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98034
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: AFL's next TV rights deal [merged]
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2014, 07:54:09 PM »
Next broadcast rights 'will look very different', says McLachlan

James Dampney 
afl.com.au
October 27, 2014 3:06 PM




AFL CHIEF executive Gillon McLachlan says the game's next broadcast rights deal will look very different to the existing one but has declined to comment on what the deal will be worth.

McLachlan is hopeful Channel 7 and Foxtel will once again share the duties for the game's next broadcast rights deal.
 
The current arrangement – the record $1.25 billion deal signed in 2011 between Seven, Foxtel and Telstra – expires at the end of 2016 and talks are expected to soon get underway over the next deal.
 
McLachlan has no doubt it will again smash the previous record, joking at a lunch hosted by Greater Western Sydney on Monday that if it doesn't, he will be looking for a new job.
 
"The broadcast rights are going to look very different," McLachlan told reporters.
 
"The evolution we've had in the media space has been significant in the last period of time.
 
"What that looks like, I'm not going to telegraph or talk to, but I'm sure the contract will look different.
 
"What I will say is we've had an incredibly successful partnership over the last few years with Channel 7 in the free-to-air space and with Foxtel.
 
"If we could continue that in this current form, I'd love that, but we'll see where those discussions go."
 
The AFL received some criticism this year as it experimented with different start times for games, however McLachlan stressed television audiences remained particularly strong.
 
"I'm not going to weigh into valuations," he said when asked about the broadcast deal, with numbers from $1.6b up to $2b being mooted.
 
"We will not be talking about our media rights generally.
 
"But we've had an incredibly strong ratings year again last year, we were watched by more Australians than any other sport, and sports rights are tent pole programming (critically valuable) for broadcasters.
 
"We're confident in our product (and) we're confident in the importance of sports rights generally to networks in a fragmenting media environment.
 
"That's the basis for confidence. After that, I'm reluctant to comment."
 
Asked about the possibility of free-to-air networks splitting the rights, McLachlan said: "We'd look at anything, obviously.
 
"But I would like to say that we have been incredibly pleased with our partnership with Seven and Foxtel for a long period of time.
 
"But when you get into these arrangements, anything's possible."

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-10-27/tv-rights-talks-loom

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98034
    • One-Eyed Richmond
AFL in bid to sell matches directly to fans online (Australian)
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2014, 04:44:32 PM »
THE chief executive of the Australian Football League has opened the door to selling matches directly to fans in a controversial move that will bypass the commercial networks, as the code chases the richest sports deal in Australian television history.

While AFL fans will still be able to watch the vast majority of games on TV, it is understood the AFL Commission is preparing to retain the rights to at least one match a week through its in-house media unit.

The games will be broadcast online, available to watch for a fee on a match-by-basis basis or through a season-long digital pass.

Asked if the league was considering an American Football-style sports rights deal, AFL chief executive Gillon McLachlan told The Australian: “That’s an option that will come into discussions.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/afl-in-bid-to-sell-matches-online/story-e6frg6n6-1227104086011