« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Should Martin sue for defamation  (Read 4911 times)

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Should Martin sue for defamation
« Reply #30 on: January 15, 2016, 02:26:37 PM »
which ever way you cut this ,Dusty was a nong ..he should pull his head in and get on with it ,and leave the litigation to something more serious
Logged

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Should Martin sue for defamation
« Reply #31 on: January 15, 2016, 02:29:42 PM »
Quote from: Gigantor on January 15, 2016, 02:26:37 PM
which ever way you cut this ,Dusty was a nong ..he should pull his head in and get on with it ,and leave the litigation to something more serious

He deserved his name sullied in such a matter did he?

Cause he's a minority and riddled with tramp stamps

If it were Ablett or judd slater and Gordon would be fallin over themselves
Logged
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13303
Re: Should Martin sue for defamation
« Reply #32 on: January 15, 2016, 02:35:34 PM »
Quote from: Gigantor on January 15, 2016, 02:26:37 PM
which ever way you cut this ,Dusty was a nong ..he should pull his head in and get on with it ,and leave the litigation to something more serious

Hmmmmmm depends on your view, he was getting peeed and carrying on with mates as thousands of australians do every day, I don't see too much harm in that

It would seem like a lot of the crucifiers have gone from "hang the bastard" to a "he was an idiot approach" to justify their past jumping to conclusions approach
Logged

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Should Martin sue for defamation
« Reply #33 on: January 15, 2016, 02:37:51 PM »
Quote from: Gigantor on January 15, 2016, 02:26:37 PM
which ever way you cut this ,Dusty was a nong ..he should pull his head in and get on with it ,and leave the litigation to something more serious

Everyone is a nong at given times in their life.

But not everyone gets publicly defamed before millions of people.

What would you do?
Logged
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19395
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Should Martin sue for defamation
« Reply #34 on: January 15, 2016, 02:50:33 PM »
Quote from: Chuck17 on January 15, 2016, 02:35:34 PM

It would seem like a lot of the crucifiers have gone from "hang the bastard" to a "he was an idiot approach" to justify their past jumping to conclusions approach

Yep that's pretty much the size of it....
Logged
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

Quote from: 1965 on November 17, 2023, 06:47:06 PM

FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline froars

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 304
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Should Martin sue for defamation
« Reply #35 on: January 15, 2016, 03:00:11 PM »
Quote from: Chuck17 on January 15, 2016, 02:35:34 PM

It would seem like a lot of the crucifiers have gone from "hang the bastard" to a "he was an idiot approach" to justify their past jumping to conclusions approach
Unless you play for Essendon or coach them, one should always give people the benefit of the doubt and let justice take its natural course.  He was a stuffwit, no crime.
Logged

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Should Martin sue for defamation
« Reply #36 on: January 15, 2016, 03:05:46 PM »
This is a richmind forum.

No fence sitting.

He was right she was wrong.
Logged
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5687
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Should Martin sue for defamation
« Reply #37 on: January 15, 2016, 05:15:46 PM »
Lol at Ox's profile pic
Logged
Go Tigers!

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Should Martin sue for defamation
« Reply #38 on: January 16, 2016, 07:37:11 AM »
Quote from: Diocletian on January 15, 2016, 02:50:33 PM
Quote from: Chuck17 on January 15, 2016, 02:35:34 PM

It would seem like a lot of the crucifiers have gone from "hang the bastard" to a "he was an idiot approach" to justify their past jumping to conclusions approach

Yep that's pretty much the size of it....

X2
Logged

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9941
Re: Should Martin sue for defamation
« Reply #39 on: January 17, 2016, 06:37:39 PM »
Nope.

Best to stay quiet.
Logged

Offline julzqld

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3918
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Should Martin sue for defamation
« Reply #40 on: January 18, 2016, 07:16:15 AM »
Quote from: Stalin on January 15, 2016, 02:29:42 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 15, 2016, 02:26:37 PM
which ever way you cut this ,Dusty was a nong ..he should pull his head in and get on with it ,and leave the litigation to something more serious

He deserved his name sullied in such a matter did he?

Cause he's a minority and riddled with tramp stamps

If it were Ablett or judd slater and Gordon would be fallin over themselves
agree
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »