Author Topic: Richmond had the 3rd oldest & experienced side in 2023 (afl site)  (Read 792 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 96301
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Richmond had the 3rd oldest & experienced side in 2023 (afl site)
« on: September 04, 2023, 04:33:45 PM »
The data is collated from each team's selected 23 players each week, including the tactical substitute.

2023 average age per team

Geelong – 27.4 years
Collingwood – 27.1
Richmond – 26.8
Western Bulldogs – 26.5
Melbourne – 26.1
Brisbane – 26.1
Carlton – 25.8
Port Adelaide – 25.6
Sydney – 25.5
Greater Western Sydney – 25.5
Gold Coast – 25.3
West Coast – 25.2
St Kilda – 25.2
Essendon – 25.2
North Melbourne – 25.1
Adelaide – 24.8
Fremantle – 24.6
Hawthorn – 24.3

2023 average games played per team

Geelong – 134
Collingwood – 123
Richmond – 120
Melbourne – 116
Brisbane – 115
Western Bulldogs – 109
Sydney – 106
Port Adelaide – 98
West Coast – 94
North Melbourne – 93
St Kilda – 91
Greater Western Sydney – 90
Gold Coast – 90
Carlton – 88
Essendon – 85
Adelaide – 83
Fremantle – 75
Hawthorn – 71


Richmond has some rejuvenation to come.

Richmond has farewelled retiring pair Jack Riewoldt and Trent Cotchin which will bring down the Tigers' average age and experience (both ranked at No.3 this season).

https://www.afl.com.au/news/1021524/in-the-sweet-spot-how-does-your-club-rank-for-age-experience

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3979
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond had the 3rd oldest & experienced side in 2023 (afl site)
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2023, 10:56:01 PM »
And we finished where playing mostly those old buggers. Yep the future is great no kids who can force aging players out and maintain a standard.

The real trouble is no one want's to admit how ordinary the tier below the vets really is, apart from the odd one or two.

Online Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5047
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Richmond had the 3rd oldest & experienced side in 2023 (afl site)
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2023, 03:10:57 PM »
And we finished where playing mostly those old buggers. Yep the future is great no kids who can force aging players out and maintain a standard.

The real trouble is no one want's to admit how ordinary the tier below the vets really is, apart from the odd one or two.

Are you capable of just commenting on a topic without some sort of reference to how right you are and how wrong everyone else is?

You are the most self-absorbed poster i've ever come across.

Also, I'm pretty sure most on here can see that we lack top end youth and that the list needs a lot of work. That's what happens when you finish up the top end of the ladder for a sustained period. It's quite obvious.

Online Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18550
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Richmond had the 3rd oldest & experienced side in 2023 (afl site)
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2023, 04:07:04 PM »
claw's not happy unless he's not happy. :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3979
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond had the 3rd oldest & experienced side in 2023 (afl site)
« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2023, 01:28:15 PM »
And we finished where playing mostly those old buggers. Yep the future is great no kids who can force aging players out and maintain a standard.

The real trouble is no one want's to admit how ordinary the tier below the vets really is, apart from the odd one or two.

Are you capable of just commenting on a topic without some sort of reference to how right you are and how wrong everyone else is?

You are the most self-absorbed poster i've ever come across.

Also, I'm pretty sure most on here can see that we lack top end youth and that the list needs a lot of work. That's what happens when you finish up the top end of the ladder for a sustained period. It's quite obvious.
Nope.