Richard Tambling threads [merged]

[WilliamPowell]

I said this earlierand will say it again.

Tambling is contracted for him to be traded he has to agree...if he don't agree then he stays

Don't lose sight of that little FACT  people

[jackstar is back again]

If and I mean if we trade Tambling we would need a good player and a first round pick in, a pick under 12, otherwise we have been screwed IMO.

You would have to be joking.
No way he is worth a first round pick, his currency isnt that good

[WA Tiger]

If and I mean if we trade Tambling we would need a good player and a first round pick in, a pick under 12, otherwise we have been screwed IMO.

You would have to be joking.
No way he is worth a first round pick, his currency isnt that good

Ok I will repeat myself for you.

Trying to be optomistic for a change, instead of continualy taking crap for our players that we took so early in drafts. Ala Ottens, we got screwed there and have been ever since. Why can't we push the trade boundries like we have been pushed over the years, or should we just take it up the behind again... are you laughing from all all the past trade years???

Like WP says he has to agree too.

[WilliamPowell]

Ok I will repeat myself for you.

Trying to be optomistic for a change, instead of continualy taking crap for our players that we took so early in drafts. Ala Ottens, we got screwed there and have been ever since. Why can't we push the trade boundries like we have been pushed over the years, or should we just take it up the behind again... are you laughing from all all the past trade years???

Like WP says he has to agree too.

Have to say WAT we didn't get screwed with the Ottens deal as we got 2 first round picks for him which was a good deal. I think what happened is most people would think we screwed up in our selections when using the picks.....

[Infamy]

If and I mean if we trade Tambling we would need a good player and a first round pick in, a pick under 12, otherwise we have been screwed IMO.

You would have to be joking.
No way he is worth a first round pick, his currency isnt that good

Look at the picks that were used to get Lovett to StKilda and Williams to Essendon

[WA Tiger]

Ok I will repeat myself for you.

Trying to be optomistic for a change, instead of continualy taking crap for our players that we took so early in drafts. Ala Ottens, we got screwed there and have been ever since. Why can't we push the trade boundries like we have been pushed over the years, or should we just take it up the behind again... are you laughing from all all the past trade years???

Like WP says he has to agree too.

Have to say WAT we didn't get screwed with the Ottens deal as we got 2 first round picks for him which was a good deal. I think what happened is most people would think we screwed up in our selections when using the picks.....

Yeah Infamy said the same when I brought that up last year... I don't know, I know we stuffed the picks up but really I would have thought he was worth more, perhaps at the time, but hey thats what I thought then, and in hindsight still do.

[WA Tiger]

If and I mean if we trade Tambling we would need a good player and a first round pick in, a pick under 12, otherwise we have been screwed IMO.

You would have to be joking.
No way he is worth a first round pick, his currency isnt that good

Look at the picks that were used to get Lovett to StKilda and Williams to Essendon

What were they please mate??

[Francois Jackson]

If and I mean if we trade Tambling we would need a good player and a first round pick in, a pick under 12, otherwise we have been screwed IMO.

LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

A 1st round pick AND a good player.

What do you actually think he is worth?

We are living in fantasy land if we think the above suggestion is any possible remote chance.

Trying to be optomistic for a change, instead of continualy taking crap for our players that we took so early in drafts. Ala Ottens, we got screwed there and have been ever since. Why can't we push the trade boundries like we have been pushed over the years, or should we just take it up the behind again... are you laughing from all all the past trade years???

sorry pal you are wrong we did not get screwed in that ottens.

No one told us to draft Meyer and Pattision, we brought that on ourselves.

[tdy]

If and I mean if we trade Tambling we would need a good player and a first round pick in, a pick under 12, otherwise we have been screwed IMO.

LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

A 1st round pick AND a good player.

What do you actually think he is worth?

We are living in fantasy land if we think the above suggestion is any possible remote chance.

Trying to be optomistic for a change, instead of continualy taking crap for our players that we took so early in drafts. Ala Ottens, we got screwed there and have been ever since. Why can't we push the trade boundries like we have been pushed over the years, or should we just take it up the behind again... are you laughing from all all the past trade years???

sorry pal you are wrong we did not get screwed in that ottens.

No one told us to draft Meyer and Pattision, we brought that on ourselves.

god they were a useless pair. 

[WA Tiger]

If and I mean if we trade Tambling we would need a good player and a first round pick in, a pick under 12, otherwise we have been screwed IMO.

LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

A 1st round pick AND a good player.

What do you actually think he is worth?

We are living in fantasy land if we think the above suggestion is any possible remote chance.

Trying to be optomistic for a change, instead of continualy taking crap for our players that we took so early in drafts. Ala Ottens, we got screwed there and have been ever since. Why can't we push the trade boundries like we have been pushed over the years, or should we just take it up the behind again... are you laughing from all all the past trade years???

sorry pal you are wrong we did not get screwed in that ottens.

No one told us to draft Meyer and Pattision, we brought that on ourselves.

No worries, read the rest of my post too.

[mightytiges]

We could end up with just Lids remaining from the 2004 National draft after this trade period if Blingers and McGuane are traded and Polo is delisted  .

[Smokey]

What were they please mate??

Pick 16.  Essendon got that for Lovett and then traded it to Hawthorn for Williams.

[Smokey]

We could end up with just Lids remaining from the 2004 National draft after this trade period if Blingers and McGuane are traded and Polo is delisted  .

It would be all Jackson's fault.   

[Penelope]

Ok I will repeat myself for you.

Trying to be optomistic for a change, instead of continualy taking crap for our players that we took so early in drafts. Ala Ottens, we got screwed there and have been ever since. Why can't we push the trade boundries like we have been pushed over the years, or should we just take it up the behind again... are you laughing from all all the past trade years???

Like WP says he has to agree too.

Have to say WAT we didn't get screwed with the Ottens deal as we got 2 first round picks for him which was a good deal. I think what happened is most people would think we screwed up in our selections when using the picks.....

True WP. Also, ottens wanted out and had recently had back surgery. It took him two years before he was playing anything remotely like decent footy and i don't believe he has shown consistently, the potential he showed before his back injury. It was a good trade we just stuffed up what we did with the picks.

[Loui Tufga]

I don't think we really stuffed the picks up that much. At the time we chose players to fit our needs with those later picks, unfortunatly it was one of the shallowest drafts of all time, the players we picked just never came on. If you have a good look back at that draft from pick 12 (Meyer) there are only about 5 or 6 guys that have really done anything! and of that lot Shermin at pick 45 would the the pick of them. In hindsight the biggest mistake we made in that draft was not going for a key position player with our second pick (Buddy )