Author Topic: Non-Richmond games 2011  (Read 87923 times)

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #660 on: September 17, 2011, 10:38:31 PM »
Amazing game.

So close bluebaggers yet so far :rollin

Carlton blaming umpires for not paying the hold on Walker in the goal square.
To be fair umpire's miss things but they also pay things that aren't there and most games end up equal.

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7330
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #661 on: September 17, 2011, 10:42:29 PM »
If you're in front when the siren goes it wouldn't matter! SUFFER BLOOZ

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13718
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #662 on: September 17, 2011, 10:47:46 PM »
Amazing game.

So close bluebaggers yet so far :rollin

Carlton blaming umpires for not paying the hold on Walker in the goal square.
To be fair umpire's miss things but they also pay things that aren't there and most games end up equal.
That's a crock
It doesn't always end up fair, in fact most games it doesbt

The umpires are a pathetic bunch of people led by a joker in Geisch.
That wasn't a free but why pay it in the first but not in the last.

Geisch has turned this unpiring into a comedy act

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #663 on: September 17, 2011, 10:50:17 PM »
Bigfooty not working. Must of gone into melt down after the Carlton lose  :lol

Offline T_o_O

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 38
  • Big Fish
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #664 on: September 17, 2011, 10:53:17 PM »
Amazing game.

So close bluebaggers yet so far :rollin

Carlton blaming umpires for not paying the hold on Walker in the goal square.
To be fair umpire's miss things but they also pay things that aren't there and most games end up equal.

I honestly wouldn't have paid it.

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7330
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #665 on: September 17, 2011, 10:54:28 PM »
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/

use this and let the entertainment begin  ;D

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #666 on: September 17, 2011, 11:21:59 PM »
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/

use this and let the entertainment begin  ;D

Working fine again now.

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #667 on: September 18, 2011, 01:11:53 AM »
Any time Carlton lose is a good day for footy. :thumbsup

Offline RollsRoyce

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #668 on: September 18, 2011, 01:35:06 AM »
Any time Carlton lose is a good day for footy. :thumbsup

Hear,hear :clapping. And their feeder team, Preston lost today too, so a pretty forgettable day all up for the Navy Blooz.
And I don't want to hear any of that "how brave they were" crap either. The filthy cheats reaped what they sowed, and the environmental ambassador is another year closer to retirement with still nothing to show for it :rollin

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 96394
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #669 on: September 18, 2011, 05:23:13 PM »

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #670 on: September 18, 2011, 05:42:51 PM »
Territory Thunder had a run away premiership win today.

You beauty!
 
 :cheers
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58307
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #671 on: September 18, 2011, 11:01:51 PM »
and the environmental ambassador is another year closer to retirement with still nothing to show for it :rollin
Yep Judd is 28 now. I know he's a freak but beyond 30 his body will start to slow down. So the next two years are crucial for the bluebaggers.

Their list lacks depth to cover their top graders but if they could keep their best 22 on the park then sadly they do have a potential top 4 side :chuck. The key for them is finding a No.1 big key forward.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #672 on: September 19, 2011, 11:45:22 AM »
and the environmental ambassador is another year closer to retirement with still nothing to show for it :rollin
Yep Judd is 28 now. I know he's a freak but beyond 30 his body will start to slow down. So the next two years are crucial for the bluebaggers.


Judd doesn't seem to bust games open against the top sides like he use to.
I don't consider swans a top side even though they made it to the last 6.

Offline Sabretooth

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #673 on: September 19, 2011, 12:44:41 PM »
The umps are terrible in the West, Carlton actually did well to get that close.

If on the other hand we were playing, the umps would have ensured a massacre.

Offline Puntroadroar

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 395
  • Our Very own Top Gun
Re: Non-Richmond games 2011
« Reply #674 on: September 19, 2011, 12:58:58 PM »
Yep Judd is 28 now. I know he's a freak but beyond 30 his body will start to slow down. So the next two years are crucial for the bluebaggers.

Their list lacks depth to cover their top graders but if they could keep their best 22 on the park then sadly they do have a potential top 4 side :chuck. The key for them is finding a No.1 big key forward.

What I find hilarious apart from watching them get robbed in a final  ;D is the fact that the guy they all bang on about is well held and the guy they gave away for him ended up being the difference, is that the ultimate self uppercut ever?  :clapping
There's no I in team, but there is 5 i's in Individual Brilliance.