Author Topic: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?  (Read 3049 times)

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #15 on: July 03, 2011, 09:31:58 AM »
In Tuck, O'Reilly, Conca, Morton, Webberley
Out Hislop, grigg, farmer, browne, thursfield
Play Post in the ruck at least he will provide a contest

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40271
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #16 on: July 03, 2011, 09:39:51 AM »
Outs: Grigg, Thursfield, Griffiths (inj), Hislop, Post, Helbig

Ins: McGuane, Conca, Tuck, Nason, Morton, Miller
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline MADTIGER2010

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #17 on: July 03, 2011, 11:12:07 AM »
Outs: Grigg, Thursfield, Griffiths (inj), Hislop, Post, Helbig

Ins: McGuane, Conca, Tuck, Nason, Morton, Miller

LOL @ dropping Post again. Dropping him in the first place a few weeks ago was nonsense

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #18 on: July 03, 2011, 04:36:51 PM »
Outs: Grigg, Thursfield, Griffiths (inj), Hislop, Post, Helbig

Ins: McGuane, Conca, Tuck, Nason, Morton, Miller

LOL @ dropping Post again. Dropping him in the first place a few weeks ago was nonsense
as is bringing in Tuck is pointless.
The club that keeps giving.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #19 on: July 03, 2011, 05:12:27 PM »
Outs: Grigg, Thursfield, Griffiths (inj), Hislop, Post, Helbig

Ins: McGuane, Conca, Tuck, Nason, Morton, Miller

LOL @ dropping Post again. Dropping him in the first place a few weeks ago was nonsense
as is bringing in Tuck is pointless.

eff anyone that poos on Tucky. The bloke has been a good player for us and is still in our best 22. "Oh but he wont be around for our next premiership!!!" suck a effing big one. Half the team that played yesterday arent fit to lace his boots and they wont be around for our next FINALS game let alone a flag

« Last Edit: July 03, 2011, 06:29:57 PM by one-eyed »

Offline Rodgerramjet

  • OER - CONTRIBUTOR
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001
  • Never cast pearls before swine.
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #20 on: July 03, 2011, 05:22:06 PM »


LOL @ dropping Post again. Dropping him in the first place a few weeks ago was nonsense

Totally agree, post did a few good things yesterday, needs to stay in the side for the rest of the year.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2011, 06:22:57 PM by Rodgerramjet »
The lips of Wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #21 on: July 03, 2011, 05:47:58 PM »
How funny that most of the "outs" identified for next week are the ones that most whined about wanting as "ins" over the past few weeks.

Scapegoats to the left, crucifixions to the right.   ::)

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #22 on: July 03, 2011, 07:51:14 PM »
How funny that most of the "outs" identified for next week are the ones that most whined about wanting as "ins" over the past few weeks.

Scapegoats to the left, crucifixions to the right.   ::)

thats how we roll in OER  ;D

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #23 on: July 03, 2011, 08:02:37 PM »
 :lol

most of the regular scapegoats were not playing  yesterday, except perhaps nahas who was our best and rance who at least never threw in the towel.

Outs: Grigg, Thursfield, Griffiths (inj), Hislop, Post, Helbig

Ins: McGuane, Conca, Tuck, Nason, Morton, Miller

preety fair call there WP, could have done with the run that nason can give. I think we could see perhaps why post is out of favour. at times he just looked totally lost.


eff anyone that poos on Tucky. The bloke has been a good player for us and is still in our best 22. "Oh but he wont be around for our next premiership!!!" suck a effing big one. Half the team that played yesterday arent fit to lace his boots and they wont be around for our next FINALS game let alone a flag



so true. week in and week out we are getting smashed in the clearances. yesterday the flood gates really opened based on this aspect. there is no one else that can come in and help in this area. NO ONE!



“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40271
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #24 on: July 03, 2011, 09:27:19 PM »
Outs: Grigg, Thursfield, Griffiths (inj), Hislop, Post, Helbig

Ins: McGuane, Conca, Tuck, Nason, Morton, Miller

preety fair call there WP, could have done with the run that nason can give. I think we could see perhaps why post is out of favour. at times he just looked totally lost.



Lost is a good word - poor reader of the play IMHO

I've inlcuded Tuck & Nason because they have been in Coburgs best for the last few weeks. If we are only giving games to those who deserve and have earnt it as per Saturday's enlightening article then those 2 play. Simple as that
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #25 on: July 03, 2011, 09:53:02 PM »
Don't really care to be honest, we don't have the depth to bring in a quality player/s, doesn't matter, bring in who you want we don't have a chance the way we played Sat.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98047
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #26 on: July 05, 2011, 03:34:30 PM »
Herald-Sun's footy barometer - Round 16

RICHMOND

ON THE BLOCK: Andrew Browne, Tom Hislop, Jaydn Post, Will Thursfield. Ben Griffiths is likely to miss with bruised ribs.

ON THE CUSP: Shane Tuck simply must play, even if he's not a part of Hardwick's long-term plan. Angus Graham for Browne. Reece Conca needed a rest and should return. Brad Miller for Griffiths or Post.

MICHAEL WARNER’S FORECAST: The Tigers were pathetic against Carlton but get a chance to redeem themselves against Essendon at the MCG on Saturday night. They play the Gold Coast the following week. First quarters have troubled Richmond all season, but surely not this week ...

http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/afl/footy-barometer-round-16/story-e6frepf6-1226041482103

Ox

  • Guest
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #27 on: July 05, 2011, 03:56:43 PM »
BROWNE BROWNE BROWNE BROWNE BROWNE BROWNE BROWNEBROWNE
 BROWNEBROWNE BROWNE BROWNE BROWNE BROWNE BROWNE
 BROWNE BROWNE V BROWNE BROWNE BROWNE BROWNE BROWNE
 BROWNE BROWNE BROWNE BROWNE BROWNE BUROWNE BROWNE

FOR

GUS

HTF HAS THIS WALKING PEAR MAINTAINED HIS SPOT IN THE TEAM????????

This makes it hard to respect you,Dimmer.

wtf r u thinking????????????

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98047
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #28 on: July 06, 2011, 01:02:13 PM »
RICHMOND - In the Mix

After copping a 103-point thrashing from Carlton in round 15, the Tigers could make a number of changes for Saturday night's clash with Essendon. While their VFL team had the bye last weekend, Shane Tuck is one player who had been pushing hard for a return to the AFL side. He is a good chance to replace Ben Griffiths, who was subbed off early against the Blues after suffering a rib injury. Matt White (knee) and Daniel Connors (quad) are expected to return through the VFL in the next two weeks.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/117860/default.aspx

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Changes for next week's game against the Bombers?
« Reply #29 on: July 06, 2011, 04:18:54 PM »
I agree with some on Tuck. If the bloke is on our list he should play if his form is good. If we give him a contract for the year, play him ffs. Otherwise somebodies head should roll for doing so.

OUTS - Farmer, just not good enough and should be gone at seasons end
        - Hislop, close to the worst AFL player i have ever seen- up there with Rombotus
        - Thursfield, needed a few games at Coburg before coming in last week
        - Post, as much as everyone wants this kid to become something, he just is not good enough at the moment. Play him at Coburg for the rest of the year, give him a massive preseason and see how he goes next year. He just doesn't deserve a game at the moment.
         - Browne, needs a rest, played terribly against the blues but has been OK in some games.
         - Jackson, the RFC need to make an example of a senior player after last weeks performance and Jacko has been pretty ordinary most of the year IMO. Only gets a game because we are so shyt.


INS - Tuck, we simply need his hardness and his clearance work.
      - Gourdis, IMO just needs to play
      - McGuane, rate him above Thurstfield and Post, simple.
      - Conca, adds some well needed run
      -Gus, hopefully has learnt that he must fight for his position in the side
      - Morton, simply need help in the forward line.

6 changes after the effort of last week sounds about right to me.