Moloney over Lonergan or any number of mids we have.

[gerkin greg]

sheesh let's look at moloney too slow as one sided as they come disposal is not afl standard is extremely poor defensively unable to follow instruction has a poor attitude in fact there is not much going for this guy he's old lacks durability wants a serious pay packet sheesh its no wonder no clubs wanted him not his own not gws or gc who have money to burn none of the successful clubs but I guess someone is a sucker

poo version of tuck on massive dollars and people wonder why we are going backwards with cameron in charge sheesh

[Mr Magic]

sheesh let's look at moloney too slow as one sided as they come disposal is not afl standard is extremely poor defensively unable to follow instruction has a poor attitude in fact there is not much going for this guy he's old lacks durability wants a serious pay packet sheesh its no wonder no clubs wanted him not his own not gws or gc who have money to burn none of the successful clubs but I guess someone is a sucker

poo version of tuck on massive dollars and people wonder why we are going backwards with cameron in charge sheesh

 

[Yeahright]

There is simply not nearly enough detail in the OP to weigh up the validity of the opinion.

I see what you tried to do there!

Oh and Moloneys a spud.

P.S Claw, can you tell us what type of player we have to many of?

[Danog]

sheesh let's look at moloney too slow as one sided as they come disposal is not afl standard is extremely poor defensively unable to follow instruction has a poor attitude in fact there is not much going for this guy he's old lacks durability wants a serious pay packet sheesh its no wonder no clubs wanted him not his own not gws or gc who have money to burn none of the successful clubs but I guess someone is a sucker

poo version of tuck on massive dollars and people wonder why we are going backwards with cameron in charge sheesh

 

That's good... TOO good 

[dwaino]

sheesh let's look at moloney too slow as one sided as they come disposal is not afl standard is extremely poor defensively unable to follow instruction has a poor attitude in fact there is not much going for this guy he's old lacks durability wants a serious pay packet sheesh its no wonder no clubs wanted him not his own not gws or gc who have money to burn none of the successful clubs but I guess someone is a sucker

poo version of tuck on massive dollars and people wonder why we are going backwards with cameron in charge sheesh

Standing applause

[the claw]

Stephan Martin would have cost us a Draft Pick.Unlike the big S who cost us nothing.BTW i swear we drafted a couple of Talls/Ruckman over the past few years.Ever heard of Free Agency Claw?Use that for a mature ruckman if need to.And yes that costs us nothing.
 

stefan martin cost exactly what again?  i suppose you lot are going to try and tell me stephenson is a better option. whats going on here?  are we trying to improve the list or are we just going thru the motions.
maric martin hannath and mcbean has to be better than maric derickx and mcbean.

[the claw]

Moloney was only interested in going to the Lions so it's all moot

Like asking why we didn't pick up Ablett

lol not a skerrick of truth in that in fact its ignorance at its best.

[the claw]

I don't want to pay 375k a year for a plodder with as many deficiencies in his game as Moloney, no

oh hes a plodder. give me more plodders then. the average income of an afl player is 280 k if i remember correctly.again i ask if you think moloney a plodder what do you call a shedload of our players. as stated he would be a top 10 player with us. everytime this bloke plays us he literally kills us but hey you stick with jacko and white and all the other hacks.

you know a bit about moloney it seems.  how about you tell us exactly what moloneys weaknesses are.you talk about em but never mention them.and i dont mean in a pee take at me be honest with yourself for once.

[the claw]

sheesh let's look at moloney too slow as one sided as they come disposal is not afl standard is extremely poor defensively unable to follow instruction has a poor attitude in fact there is not much going for this guy he's old lacks durability wants a serious pay packet sheesh its no wonder no clubs wanted him not his own not gws or gc who have money to burn none of the successful clubs but I guess someone is a sucker

poo version of tuck on massive dollars and people wonder why we are going backwards with cameron in charge sheesh

i have to say well done very good pee take. but let me give some advice.  it works better if theres a hint of fact to it.nice try but keep working on it.

[Danog]

I don't want to pay 375k a year for a plodder with as many deficiencies in his game as Moloney, no

oh hes a plodder. give me more plodders then. the average income of an afl player is 280 k if i remember correctly.again i ask if you think moloney a plodder what do you call a shedload of our players. as stated he would be a top 10 player with us. everytime this bloke plays us he literally kills us but hey you stick with jacko and white and all the other hacks.

you know a bit about moloney it seems.  how about you tell us exactly what moloneys weaknesses are.you talk about em but never mention them.and i dont mean in a pee take at me be honest with yourself for once.

But we've got plenty according to you 

[Smokey]

sheesh let's look at moloney too slow as one sided as they come disposal is not afl standard is extremely poor defensively unable to follow instruction has a poor attitude in fact there is not much going for this guy he's old lacks durability wants a serious pay packet sheesh its no wonder no clubs wanted him not his own not gws or gc who have money to burn none of the successful clubs but I guess someone is a sucker

poo version of tuck on massive dollars and people wonder why we are going backwards with cameron in charge sheesh

Got that about right Gerks.   

[gerkin greg]

moloney's weaknesses are there for all to see, another glass half full type, one good year and lol it's up on a pedestal
trying to get rid of plodders not add more good old richmond

Got that about right Gerks.   

yeah i thought so

[tigers_of_old_1980]

sheesh let's look at moloney too slow as one sided as they come disposal is not afl standard is extremely poor defensively unable to follow instruction has a poor attitude in fact there is not much going for this guy he's old lacks durability wants a serious pay packet sheesh its no wonder no clubs wanted him not his own not gws or gc who have money to burn none of the successful clubs but I guess someone is a sucker

poo version of tuck on massive dollars and people wonder why we are going backwards with cameron in charge sheesh

i have to say well done very good pee take. but let me give some advice.  it works better if theres a hint of fact to it.nice try but keep working on it.

But if he included facts it wouldnt've been a pisstake of you claws.

Personally I have full confidence in the club and the way they are traveling at the moment, and our recruiting department has been getting it more right than wrong over the last couple of seasons.

[YellowandBlackBlood]

Moloney has many other "issues" that most clubs know about, hence why no one was interested.

Claw, you seem to think you know a lot but unfortunately you don't like many on these boards. The difference is that you are more pointed with your criticisms and come across as aggressive and very negative. Ah well, we all accept free speech.

Also you might want to quote the median wage rather than the average or even the mode. That would give us a far better idea of what footballers are generally paid. Despite there being a reasonable number of players, the population is far too small to be quoting averages as they would be skewed by the high paid players.

[Crazy_Ivan]

Stephan Martin would have cost us a Draft Pick.Unlike the big S who cost us nothing.BTW i swear we drafted a couple of Talls/Ruckman over the past few years.Ever heard of Free Agency Claw?Use that for a mature ruckman if need to.And yes that costs us nothing.
 

stefan martin cost exactly what again?  i suppose you lot are going to try and tell me stephenson is a better option. whats going on here?  are we trying to improve the list or are we just going thru the motions.
maric martin hannath and mcbean has to be better than maric derickx and mcbean.

Went for picks 53 and 73.Geez he must be highly rated.Put it into context we got what pick 42 for Graham?