Author Topic: Biggest sooky little babies?  (Read 195716 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1155 on: March 12, 2023, 05:15:54 AM »
Quote from: Mr Meow
On paper this shapes as reasonable but can we really say 2011 Collingwood was on the same level as 2020 Geelong? Nobody gave Geelong a chance last year. I'd argue the 7 changes in the 2022 side were all crucial in shaping it into a legitimate finals force rather than a team that couldn't hack the real stuff. So yes technically Richmond beat a side that would later become premiers but the consensus is that 2017 Adelaide, 2019 GWS and 2020 Geelong weren't great sides. None of them could cope with Richmond. Whereas in the Geelong triumvirate of premierships Hawthorn and Collingwood stood up, the Bulldogs pushed some much more talented sides to the wire and St Kilda certainly could've nabbed one or two if the ball bounced differently. In a world without Richmond we probably see GWS nab a flag from 7th, Adelaide finally win another premiership (with a worse side than their mid 2000s teams that didn't even make GFs) and universally mocked pretenders Geelong, Port or Brisbane get one. To go with the Doggies fairytale flag from 8th. It's a compliment to say that Richmond were the only strong side in that era who could stand up in finals. 2008-2013 you had multiple teams putting on incredible H&A seasons (18-4 or better) with some underdogs pushing them all the way in finals and even nabbing the odd flag. I just see that as a stronger top 4 collectively.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-dustin-martin-wins-a-4th-norm-smith-medal-and-premiership-will-he-be-regarded-as-the-greatest-player-of-all-time.1341391/page-253#post-78213705

Broadsword

  • Guest
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1156 on: March 12, 2023, 03:16:03 PM »
It is undeniable that had we not won the premierships other teams would have won them. That is so insightful I need to go and sit down while I let that sink in. A pleasure to hear from the sooky babies as usual.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1157 on: March 21, 2023, 03:25:54 PM »
When you're such an obsessed opposition fan that you talk about Richmond even when incidents have nothing to do with Richmond or our players :wallywink.

Quote from: Mez Walker
Nothing says Richmond is a protected club more than Pickett not being sent straight to the tribunal. #afl
https://twitter.com/mezmclean/status/1637735795229614080

Quote from: Brett
Going on from your explantion.

Franklin - Superstar

Pickett - Rising star

McAdam - not either

Lucky Cotchin wasn’t one of the offenders he would’ve been given a bonus.
https://twitter.com/BrettCappa/status/1637946815705407488

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1158 on: March 22, 2023, 06:43:02 AM »
Quote from: CrowToon
The reality is that the 17 grand final doesn't even make the top 10 list of traumas experienced by a Crows fan since then. It just doesn't register as pain such is our acquired threshold.

Nek minnit ...

Quote from: Go the Guts
Which the top team had to play away from their home, even though they won both of their finals. #VFL
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/afl-2023-round-2-crows-v-tigers-sat-march-25th-4-35pm-aedt-ao.1349358/post-78353926

Quote from: 7AFL
Shane McAdam has been found guilty of rough conduct on Jacob Wehr by the tribunal ❌
Quote from: Matty C
Hey @AFL, what potential for injury was there in this one?

Shiel and Cotchin collide - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkFSpClBLqQ

Dylan Shiel could not finish the game after showing signs of delayed concussion.
Quote from: Matty C
Please tell us all how many games Cotchin was given for that one...  
https://twitter.com/cookster17/status/1638094327418351616

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1159 on: March 24, 2023, 08:45:15 PM »
Port fans still whinging about a deliberate out of bounds call three years later :wallywink.

Quote from: #since1969 🎹🍐🌻🇺🇦
Remember Hammer getting outed in the Prelim vs Richmond? Cost us a goal & the game… will never forget
https://twitter.com/_Since1969/status/1638873561111855105


Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3717
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1160 on: March 24, 2023, 08:48:55 PM »
Port fans still whinging about a deliberate out of bounds call three years later :wallywink.

Quote from: #since1969 🎹🍐🌻🇺🇦
Remember Hammer getting outed in the Prelim vs Richmond? Cost us a goal & the game… will never forget
https://twitter.com/_Since1969/status/1638873561111855105

As deliberate as it gets. Literally had a team mate either side and put it out right btw the 2.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1161 on: March 25, 2023, 02:14:09 PM »
AFL Twitter fanbases ranked. This is definitive.


https://twitter.com/penguinickx/status/1639241659060989955

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1162 on: March 27, 2023, 07:15:43 PM »
Quote from: stuartjmcnamara
He’s correct. Richmond’s membership base includes a lot of pets and people that live overseas (probably bots anyway).

Quote from: Kev's Magpies
Let’s be honest you guys wouldn’t have won those flags if you kept Hardwick and if he got sacked you wouldn’t be getting those premierships
https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1640111886560817153

 :stupid

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5286
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1163 on: March 27, 2023, 08:53:57 PM »
AFL Twitter fanbases ranked. This is definitive.


https://twitter.com/penguinickx/status/1639241659060989955

This really makes me laugh.

Basically let's fire up the 4 biggest fan bases so this post gets the most traction possible lol
Go Tigers!

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1164 on: March 27, 2023, 10:22:41 PM »
Quote from: qldmagpie67
Richmond don’t scare me really
There a slower side and there lazy
There win and draw have flattered them they could ache easily be 0-2
There dependant so dependant on 6 players it can unravel very quick
Lynch can’t kick goals when the ball doesn’t go inside there 50m so there’s the challenge
Win it at the coal face send it deep and pressure them to death
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=91670&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30


Online Fluffy Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2449
  • Yes I was realy born in Richmond
    • Canning A.R.T.S.
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1165 on: March 27, 2023, 10:34:14 PM »
Quote from: qldmagpie67

Win it at the coal face send it deep and pressure them to death
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=91670&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30

Same game plan to beat any team. Shows how stupid this post is.
Here , kitty kitty. Here , kitty kitty.   AAAUGH!

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8891
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1166 on: March 28, 2023, 02:38:40 AM »
Quote from: qldmagpie67
Richmond don’t scare me really
There a slower side and there lazy
There win and draw have flattered them they could ache easily be 0-2
There dependant so dependant on 6 players it can unravel very quick
Lynch can’t kick goals when the ball doesn’t go inside there 50m so there’s the challenge
Win it at the coal face send it deep and pressure them to death
https://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=91670&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30



THEY'RE***

Fmd

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3717
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1167 on: March 28, 2023, 05:32:31 AM »
“Lynch can’t kick goals when the ball doesn’t go inside their fwd 50”

Geez what a revolutionary take that is. If only every team knew that to stop the opposition forward from kicking goals, you’ve just got to keep the ball more then 50 metres away from the goal…..

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1168 on: March 28, 2023, 05:34:29 AM »
Quote from: Aetos 68
No brainer. He’s 100% spot on. When Richmond miss out on the 8 this year they will go back to having an empty MCG.
Quote from: peter crisp
If there is one side I hate it's Richmond and looking forward to the game Friday
https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1640111886560817153

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95385
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1169 on: March 31, 2023, 12:23:32 AM »
Quote from: GRIMLOCK
If it was an Adelaide player doing this to a Richmond player it would be 5/6wks, just like last year Cotchin went studs up and kicked Walker over the boundary. Grub club.
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1640614950023622656



https://www.facebook.com/AFL/posts/pfbid02tQn8UCXcH5raGkLuoAXj9p2kQwT1CgkSAdudFQzJS6rJwmX6nzGiLGpcGE1B9DSjl