Author Topic: Jacob Hopper [merged]  (Read 49544 times)

Offline MaccaDacca

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #45 on: October 04, 2022, 01:06:07 PM »
Future 1st rounder, pick 31 + Soldo and Collier-Dawkins seems to be a fair trade for Hopper, not sure what more GWS would want, he will be a restricted free agent if he stays one more year and GWS get nothing #AFLTrade

https://twitter.com/diviak9/status/1577109703011598339

Looks like alot at first but makes sense if we are going to delist RCD anyway. Might as well throw him in to get the deal done.

Offline yandb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 722
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #46 on: October 04, 2022, 01:21:16 PM »
I hope that Richmond walk away from this deal for a player who played little football this year and had two knee surgeries.

GWS is just being greedy.

Unless Richmond is prepared to walk away from this deal if it too costly we will get bent over and effectively deal ourselves out of two drafts.

Offline MaccaDacca

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #47 on: October 04, 2022, 01:27:16 PM »
I hope that Richmond walk away from this deal for a player who played little football this year and had two knee surgeries.

GWS is just being greedy.

Unless Richmond is prepared to walk away from this deal if it too costly we will get bent over and effectively deal ourselves out of two drafts.

I'm all for it.

Will seem like a steal if he's tearing up the G next year with Taranto.

Online georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3745
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #48 on: October 04, 2022, 01:58:34 PM »
He is not worth pick 31 and a future first and Soldo way overs stupid deal unless they give us pick 19 again.

Offline Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3869
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #49 on: October 04, 2022, 02:05:42 PM »
He is not worth pick 31 and a future first and Soldo way overs stupid deal unless they give us pick 19 again.

Out 31, future first, Soldo
In pick 43

That’s ok for me

Keep in mind the future first will be in the mid to late teens

Online georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3745
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #50 on: October 04, 2022, 02:10:51 PM »
He is not worth pick 31 and a future first and Soldo way overs stupid deal unless they give us pick 19 again.

Out 31, future first, Soldo
In pick 43

That’s ok for me

Keep in mind the future first will be in the mid to late teens

Understand you , but me it's either 31 and Soldo and a second rounder that's it we are selling ourselves out of 2 drafts otherwise.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95465
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #51 on: October 04, 2022, 02:18:31 PM »
GWS happy with Tigers' willingness to operate in good faith, but contracted Hopper remains far more difficult than Taranto to swap. GWS say Rich future 1st & pick 31 not enough. The 2nd rounder Tiges would've got for Graham would've been perfect, but players likely to be involved

https://twitter.com/Sammy__Edmund/status/1577065244903411712

Online georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3745
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #52 on: October 04, 2022, 02:23:52 PM »
GWS happy with Tigers' willingness to operate in good faith, but contracted Hopper remains far more difficult than Taranto to swap. GWS say Rich future 1st & pick 31 not enough. The 2nd rounder Tiges would've got for Graham would've been perfect, but players likely to be involved

https://twitter.com/Sammy__Edmund/status/1577065244903411712

Wow what a lod of bs he aren't worth that.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95465
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #53 on: October 04, 2022, 02:24:37 PM »
Could Ivan Soldo be a target for the Giants as part of the Jacob Hopper trade?

Jason McCartney weighs in.

Listen here: https://twitter.com/traderadio/status/1577125100792336384

Offline Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3869
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #54 on: October 04, 2022, 02:26:22 PM »
He is not worth pick 31 and a future first and Soldo way overs stupid deal unless they give us pick 19 again.

Out 31, future first, Soldo
In pick 43

That’s ok for me

Keep in mind the future first will be in the mid to late teens

Understand you , but me it's either 31 and Soldo and a second rounder that's it we are selling ourselves out of 2 drafts otherwise.

Out 31, future first and Soldo
In GWS future second ???

If we win the flag and they finish bottom 2, it’s almost the exact same pick

In some ways 19 is more valuable than pick 18

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 57995
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #55 on: October 04, 2022, 02:26:40 PM »
🗣 MEGA TRADE

Adam Cooney has put together a deal that gets Jacob Hopper to Richmond!


https://twitter.com/traderadio/status/1577084520159150081
::)

All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95465
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #56 on: October 04, 2022, 02:50:41 PM »
GWS ADMITS RICHMOND A “LITTLE BIT SHORT” SO FAR IN HOPPER OFFER

By Andrew Slevison
SEN
4 October 2022


GWS Giants GM of football Jason McCartney says there is still a bit to be worked out with Richmond in regards to Jacob Hopper.

The Tigers officially landed Tim Taranto from the Giants for picks 12 and 19 on Monday and now have their sights set on his midfield companion Hopper.

The difference in the deals is that Hopper, 25, is contracted for 2023 so the Tigers will have to come to the party in terms of a trade.

McCartney admits the two clubs have not yet come to an agreement given that Richmond so recently gave up two high picks for Taranto.

“Richmond have been really proactive and positive about what they’ve got and what they’ve put forward, so that’s a good starting point,” McCartney said on AFL Trade Radio’s Trade Exchange.

“We just feel there is a little bit of work to go and we’ve got a fair bit of time to see what we can be added to the current deal.”

That deal as it stands is this year’s pick 31 and a future first-round selection which McCartney says is a “little bit short”.

“That’s all they’ve got left obviously,” McCartney added.

“Everyone would understand that once that future first goes out, unless something else is coming in, the futures can’t be touched.

“So that’s what remains. That would feel to be a little bit short for a player of that quality and Richmond understand that.

“It’s really assessing, once again, a number of other deals that are going on and what potential opportunities can be involved there to strengthen that.

“We do need to give consideration to players as well.”

Richmond ruckman Ivan Soldo has been linked with the Giants, given their apparent shortage in that position, and McCartney admits he is a player of interest.

“It’s been talked about a little bit about Ivan,” he said.

“There’s something there, we’ll do some follow up there, there’s no doubt about that.

“We need to do some follow up on a number of options so just so we’re ready to go. If you’re going to facilitate a deal on a contracted payer, you don’t want to be scrambling in the last couple of days.”

Is McCartney confident a deal will be done? Or could Hopper still remain a Giant?

“He’s a wonderful player, there’s no doubt about that,” he said further.

“He does have a year to run. We’re mindful that he has requested that opportunity to go and play at the Richmond footy club.

“We’ll work through to facilitate what the best deal is for our football club if there’s a deal to be done.

“Richmond have been really good in their conversations around this.”

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2022/10/04/gws-admits-richmond-a-little-bit-short-so-far-in-hopper-offer/

Online pmac21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4456
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #57 on: October 04, 2022, 03:01:33 PM »
Tell GWS to FO and go after Tarryn Thomas instead

Online georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3745
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #58 on: October 04, 2022, 03:31:32 PM »
Stick tuff tigers don't breake the bank.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95465
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Jacob Hopper to Richmond thread
« Reply #59 on: October 04, 2022, 04:54:34 PM »
These media made-up trades are becoming even more ridiculous if that's possible.

This one is better for us but no way would Port give up Todd Marshall plus a heap of first and second round picks for Horne-Francis :stupid.

Quote from: 7AFL
🚨 HUGE fake trade 🚨

- Todd Marshall returns back to NSW
- JHF moves back home to SA
- Tigs gets Hopper
- North get 3 first-round picks

Who says no?


https://twitter.com/7AFL/status/1577158380996567040