« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: Rookie Draft  (Read 1164 times)

Online camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2630
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #45 on: Today at 03:35:13 PM »
I don’t understand why our club would leave Kellaway hanging .
An explanation is needed , otherwise it comes across as disrespectful to the Kellaways 
Logged

Online ajGreen

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 589
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #46 on: Today at 03:44:56 PM »
Quote from: camboon on Today at 03:35:13 PM
I don’t understand why our club would leave Kellaway hanging .
An explanation is needed , otherwise it comes across as disrespectful to the Kellaways

The only reason could be. There are not convinced he is good enough?

Seems pretty harsh taking all of his mates.

There is one spot left on the list I think b(and 1 catB which he isn't eligabe for).

So maybe they have him as a train on? Going for the last position
Logged

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11330
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #47 on: Today at 03:47:24 PM »
The fact we didn't even give him a rookie change is...quite poor IMO.

I'm not sure I've seen any club with a F/S option late in the draft not at least give them two years to have a crack?
Logged

Online Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5342
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #48 on: Today at 04:12:51 PM »
Archie Daffy shaking in his boots right now.
Logged

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5215
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #49 on: Today at 04:24:48 PM »
Quote from: camboon on Today at 03:35:13 PM
I don’t understand why our club would leave Kellaway hanging .
An explanation is needed , otherwise it comes across as disrespectful to the Kellaways

LOL .. an explanation is needed? Why?
I'm sure they have had constant communication with the Kellaway family and find it highly unlikely they would have disrespected them in this process.
Logged

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5215
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #50 on: Today at 04:30:08 PM »
Quote from: Tiger Khosh on Today at 04:12:51 PM
Archie Daffy shaking in his boots right now.

Doesn't he look like a better prospect?
Logged

Online Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5342
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #51 on: Today at 04:52:59 PM »
Quote from: Damo on Today at 04:30:08 PM
Quote from: Tiger Khosh on Today at 04:12:51 PM
Archie Daffy shaking in his boots right now.

Doesn't he look like a better prospect?

No idea tbh. I actually thought kellaway looked like a good prospect and he couldn’t even get a rookie spot in a weak draft. He was extremely consistent, averaged 19 with a dominant SA winning the national championship and 24 with Sturt which he won the U18 premiership with.
Logged

Online Buddysucks

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1170
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #52 on: Today at 05:24:48 PM »
17 other clubs had the chance to draft him and passed so one has to assume he’s not viewed as AFL standard.
Logged

Online georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4050
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #53 on: Today at 05:25:32 PM »
Back the club in and recruitment team let's not recruit players because of romance. He may be one of 3 players to push fro that rookie spot on a train on list.
Logged

Online OneEyedRichmond

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rookie Draft
« Reply #54 on: Today at 05:54:11 PM »
Quote from: Andyy on Today at 03:47:24 PM
The fact we didn't even give him a rookie change is...quite poor IMO.

I'm not sure I've seen any club with a F/S option late in the draft not at least give them two years to have a crack?

The pies say hold my beer… McGuane
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »