Author Topic: Forward line  (Read 674 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 102325
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Forward line
« on: December 16, 2025, 11:12:40 PM »
Every AFL team’s forward line ranked 1-18

Hayden Farquhar
zerohanger.com
December 16, 2025


Richmond

Ranked: 18th

The Tigers ranked dead last in almost every goal scoring metric imaginable in 2025, scoring the fewest points, creating the least shots at goal and taking the fewest marks inside 50 per game.

That's due to the lack of a spearhead target inside forward 50 outside of Tom Lynch, though the premiership hero has been unreliable as he's ever been, converting at a shocking 41.4 per cent in front of the sticks this year. Among the 44 AFL players who averaged at least 1.5 goals per game, that accuracy is the worst.

Richmond can obviously grow in this area of the field in 2026, with the likes of Jonty Faull, Harry Armstrong and Thomas Sims flashing promise this year, with Armstrong notably winning six of his 14 offensive one-on-one contests. However, not even the one-win Eagles struggled to hit the scoreboard as infrequently as the Tigers in 2025, hence their ranking in 18th.

They saw great positives in young small Seth Campbell, who led their goalkicking in 2025, while Rhyan Mansell was equally potent.

https://www.zerohanger.com/every-afl-teams-forward-line-ranked-1-18-171765/

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11432
Re: Forward line
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2025, 09:11:24 AM »
Would like to see all of Lynch, Armstrong, Faull, Hotton, Alger and Lalor in the forward line.

Sims rotating.

Campbell up to the wing.

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8796
Re: Forward line
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2025, 12:27:39 PM »
I am tipping we won’t be ranked 18th this time next year. Particularly on those metrics
"The money might have been better. But, at the end of the day, Richmond showed faith in me. It's only fair that now we're 18th on the ladder, I show the faith back in the club and do everything I can to put them in front. In the end, I'm stoked I made the decision to stay. I f***ing love this club”

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4494
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Forward line
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2025, 02:54:59 PM »
where do you think we will be ranked. We have just two experienced forwards on the entire list.

the other problems we have is winning enough ball 2nd last for disposals and actually getting the ball inside 50 we were last for that metric.
Delivery inside 50 was also a big problem. It wont be until the kids are actually played and improve enough until this improves.

The senior and mid core were the problem and we only have kids with little experience who will take time hence all the talk about fast tracking the kids we have.

We may not come 18th but it will be a problem for some while yet.

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2644
Re: Forward line
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2025, 07:14:04 PM »
I remember watching Franklin and Roughhead in their first year playing Brisbane at their best and thinking I’m not sure these blokes will make it , it’s not unusual for key forwards to take a few years.
I thought our first year keys showed a lot without Lynch and I have confidence they will step up.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4494
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Forward line
« Reply #5 on: December 29, 2025, 08:48:27 PM »
I remember watching Franklin and Roughhead in their first year playing Brisbane at their best and thinking I’m not sure these blokes will make it , it’s not unusual for key forwards to take a few years.
I thought our first year keys showed a lot without Lynch and I have confidence they will step up.

Not sure about stepping up but they should improve and be a bit better.
 Buddy had a game that made it a bit easier to have an impact early on in many ways like Richo early on he played a lot like  a hff.
Regardless he did manage 31 goals in year 2 from just 14 games.

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8796
Re: Forward line
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2026, 11:07:12 AM »
I think with a decent run with injury and probably something around the 16-18 games from Lynch we will be pleasantly surprised at the improvement of a forward line that contains Lynch, MRJ, Seth Campbell, Faull and Armstrong with cameos from some more than handy up and comers in Lalor and Hotton.
"The money might have been better. But, at the end of the day, Richmond showed faith in me. It's only fair that now we're 18th on the ladder, I show the faith back in the club and do everything I can to put them in front. In the end, I'm stoked I made the decision to stay. I f***ing love this club”

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4494
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Forward line
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2026, 04:46:04 PM »
Heres a list of the Forwards we have it includes players whose primary role is mid but are proficient forwards. Have named my senior preference first and reserves team second.

KPF  Lynch, Armstrong, Faull.
KPF Lefau, Fawcett, Sims.

General Fwd. Mansell, Algar,
General Fwd. Green, Rioli, Peucker

Mid Fwd. Hotton, Lalor, Cumming, Campbell, Taranto.
Mid Fwd. Clarke, Sonsie, Ross.

I have named 10 players who can play forward in the senior section including the kpf's.

Can reduce that by one if Campbell plays on a wing which im adamant about.

Most named are still juniors. Hence i firmly believe no matter what we think of him as a player, Mansell will play as a general forward. He is  sort of a good fit for the youngsters atm with his aggression at the man and toughness.

Hotton i think will play primarily as a forward with decent mid time a bit like we did with Bolton.
Algar is the most promising forward we have of the rest, he too may in time end up playing primarily as a mid or even hbf.

That leaves three primary  mids Lalor, Cumming and Taranto rotating thru their and the bench with Campbell on a wing.

It only leaves the question are Green Rioli and Ross better options as general forwards or mid/fwd than those named i  dont think they are.
The Talls well i think all will get exposure at some time i just went with our best Lynch and the two kids who showed the most last year.

Rather than looking for ways to play  seniors im looking at ways to play the kids ie Campbell to a wing and Algar into the 23.A move like this actually addresses things that were not great last year although you could argue Campbell to a wing is like  robbing peter to pay paul.
I think Algar and Hotton are highly promising forwards though and it ensures we get games into them while addressing what was a horrible centre line last year that was slow and poorly skilled.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 102325
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Forward line
« Reply #8 on: January 08, 2026, 10:45:25 PM »
We're the second worst side in the comp at retaining the ball inside 50.

Club     Kick inside 50 to retention %

Geelong            52.6%
W.Bulldogs        50.4%
St Kilda             49.5%
Adelaide            48.9%
GWS                 48.7%
Gold Coast        48.6%
Hawthorn          48.6%
Collingwood       48.5%
North Melbourne 47.4%
Carlton              46.5%
Melbourne         46.2%
Sydney             46.2%
Fremantle         45.9%
Essendon          45.5%
Port Adelaide     45.3%
Brisbane           44.1%
Richmond         42.3%
West Coast       40.4%

https://www.zerohanger.com/the-money-kick-who-is-the-afls-best-kick-inside-50-172028/

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4494
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Forward line
« Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 06:24:37 PM »
I would hazard a guess and say that is because of the way we bring the ball in and fail to hit targets inside fifty.

Online JP Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1714
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Forward line
« Reply #10 on: Yesterday at 07:06:20 PM »
We scored at 42.3% which put us at 17th place overall.  The best rating was Geelong at 52.6%, which makes for just over a 10% difference between the best & second worst ...

That screams a significant result at me - NOBODY IS ANY GOOD AT KICKING INTO THEIR FORWARD 50!  It's not just us, everybody is just ordinary at doing it.   

Even the best side are losing possession 47.4% of the time!  It's close enough to pot luck, even for the best at it.  That leaves plenty of room for a rapid improvement!         
Once a Tiger, always a Tiger!  Loud, proud & dangerous!

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8796
Re: Forward line
« Reply #11 on: Today at 09:01:57 AM »
We scored at 42.3% which put us at 17th place overall.  The best rating was Geelong at 52.6%, which makes for just over a 10% difference between the best & second worst ...

That screams a significant result at me - NOBODY IS ANY GOOD AT KICKING INTO THEIR FORWARD 50!  It's not just us, everybody is just ordinary at doing it.   

Even the best side are losing possession 47.4% of the time!  It's close enough to pot luck, even for the best at it.  That leaves plenty of room for a rapid improvement!         

I also see it as significant opportunity for us. As the midfield improves I am optimistic it will trigger improvement to the forward line.
"The money might have been better. But, at the end of the day, Richmond showed faith in me. It's only fair that now we're 18th on the ladder, I show the faith back in the club and do everything I can to put them in front. In the end, I'm stoked I made the decision to stay. I f***ing love this club”