Author Topic: Daniel Connors [merged]  (Read 65311 times)

Offline Oiafi

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
  • Against logic there is no armour like ignorance.
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #375 on: July 21, 2011, 11:36:29 AM »
Don't think he rides the "potential" wave. He's been injured and has had little chance to prove himself. 27 games is all he's played.

He spent time as a youngster at Coburg as he should, then he's been on and off the track because of injury (and stupidity) since he started playing seniors. How can anyone work into some form and understand the team in that environment.

Last season, after his run in with Cuz, was his most consistent for consecutive games and he started to play some good football. Before that he injured himself over-training with Cotch. Now he's injured again.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #376 on: July 21, 2011, 11:42:26 AM »
Dream Team coaches will be devastated if he never returns to the Richmond line up.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #377 on: July 21, 2011, 08:49:42 PM »
I think Dan has got some talent.

Would be delisted this year if we were a top 8 side.

Will probably be safe for 1 more year as there are 8 to go before him.

Been extremely lucky to still be on an AFL list.

I don't like guys that ride the "potential" wave for long periods of time.

Wouldn't be bothered if we got rid of him, if we do he has 12 months to save his career.
theres a shedload that has to go connors is one. personally if there is a younger player in the group of has to goes hes stays before connors.  5 stuffing yrs of exactly what has connors given us.  5 stuffing yrs we really have to stop this rot of hanging onto underperformers for inordinate amounts of time.keep a kid at least the kid may have some genuine upside.

i have to ask since his drafting in 06 just where has he improved.
people say shane tuck has to go but connors is worse than tuck in the very areas tuck is criticised in.
nope time enough for a bloke whos been arouind 5 yrs and hes still unfit,  slow as,  no motor,  not a  defensive bone in his body, and he bloody well butchers it in far worse ways than blokes like tuck ever have.

i know lets give him another 5 yrs he may just turn things around by then.
a part of the rfc actually growing and becoming professional will be when it can identify and move on non performers like connors far quicker than we have.

yes connors has talent i for one liked him a lot as a kid and thought him a good get in the nd in the  60s. but we have to change this attitude of oh golly gosh im scared if we get rid of him he will come good.
we need to get to a point where we actually trust our processes and a part iof those processes should be the ability to say yep hes had enough time lets move on.

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #378 on: July 21, 2011, 09:12:37 PM »
how many soft tissue injuries can a player have?
Body isnt up to AFL.
Nickname is now Kleenex

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #379 on: July 21, 2011, 09:27:27 PM »
I think Dan has got some talent.

Would be delisted this year if we were a top 8 side.

Will probably be safe for 1 more year as there are 8 to go before him.

Been extremely lucky to still be on an AFL list.

I don't like guys that ride the "potential" wave for long periods of time.

Wouldn't be bothered if we got rid of him, if we do he has 12 months to save his career.
theres a shedload that has to go connors is one. personally if there is a younger player in the group of has to goes hes stays before connors.  5 effing yrs of exactly what has connors given us.  5 effing yrs we really have to stop this rot of hanging onto underperformers for inordinate amounts of time.keep a kid at least the kid may have some genuine upside.

i have to ask since his drafting in 06 just where has he improved.
people say shane tuck has to go but connors is worse than tuck in the very areas tuck is criticised in.
nope time enough for a bloke whos been arouind 5 yrs and hes still unfit,  slow as,  no motor,  not a  defensive bone in his body, and he bloody well butchers it in far worse ways than blokes like tuck ever have.

i know lets give him another 5 yrs he may just turn things around by then.
a part of the rfc actually growing and becoming professional will be when it can identify and move on non performers like connors far quicker than we have.

yes connors has talent i for one liked him a lot as a kid and thought him a good get in the nd in the  60s. but we have to change this attitude of oh golly gosh im scared if we get rid of him he will come good.
we need to get to a point where we actually trust our processes and a part iof those processes should be the ability to say yep hes had enough time lets move on.

spot on hes been around for 5 years, thats plenty time enough to get afl fit -  had his chance move him along

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5099
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #380 on: July 21, 2011, 09:42:17 PM »
Why does everybody hate this kid! He is better than half the spuds on our list. He has had injuries this year but played some good footy last year in patches. Happy to see him have another go this year and next.
Facts are we have Hislop and Farmer and co getting games.

I tend to agree mate. I reckon he played some pretty good games last year. Sometimes he has off days with his boot but at least he tries to get things going and generate run. We have looked pretty stagnant in recent weeks. I reckon we couldnt have used his flair. Is pretty good 1 on 1 too.
 Plenty worse than him at our club.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #381 on: July 21, 2011, 11:48:33 PM »
Trade bait

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #382 on: July 22, 2011, 01:14:10 AM »
Trade bait

Agreed. If he was going to make it he would have already.
Too many flaws.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40207
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #383 on: July 22, 2011, 06:54:21 AM »
Trade bait

Agreed. If he was going to make it he would have already.
Too many flaws.

I've deliberately stayed out of this discussion

But although I'd trade him in a heartbeat, sadly I reckon they wont... 

Said it before will say it again, talent isn't the issue, mental toughness and application to get the most out of the talent is
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #384 on: July 22, 2011, 09:39:05 AM »
I reckon he is Steve Johnson but hasn't had enough quality around him to get his head right and now it's too late.

Next.
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #385 on: July 22, 2011, 10:38:33 AM »
Time to Tambling this guy

Offline Oiafi

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
  • Against logic there is no armour like ignorance.
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #386 on: July 22, 2011, 10:42:44 AM »
Wouldn't have Tambling's value at the moment. If we can't find a trade for Tuck or Thursty then I doubt we'd find one for Connors.

Keep or delist are the two options I reckon and if he's contracted delist is difficult. By all mean try for a trade.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #387 on: July 22, 2011, 10:53:24 AM »
Shallow draft. He'll have value. Less than Tambo but more than the other two - not hard to be worth more than zero.

Someone will be seduced by the myth.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #388 on: July 22, 2011, 12:07:25 PM »
Trade bait

Agreed. If he was going to make it he would have already.
Too many flaws.

I've deliberately stayed out of this discussion

But although I'd trade him in a heartbeat, sadly I reckon they wont...  

Said it before will say it again, talent isn't the issue, mental toughness and application to get the most out of the talent is

I think his skill level is overrated (though not by himself ;)).
Nowhere near the reliability by foot at HB that you need & turns it over way too much for my liking with sloppy disposal. Houli, Neman & Deledio are all far better exponents with the ball. Also plays far too wide of his opponent.

He thinks he plays his best footy in the position but if that's his best..

If we don't believe he has the tank to play on the ball by now, he never will.
Try and trade him off but if no takers I'd delist him.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97882
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #389 on: July 22, 2011, 12:09:31 PM »
From RFC twitter:

"he's [Connors] still out with a quad at the moment, and fitness staff just want to make sure hes 100% before he's back"