Author Topic: Daniel Connors [merged]  (Read 65279 times)

Ox

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #510 on: April 16, 2012, 10:56:24 AM »
yeh,ok....

what a crock of big brother poo

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5401
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #511 on: April 16, 2012, 11:17:20 AM »
Edited  :banghead :banghead

I think so ox. Slander or libel or something like that. It hasn't been proven by a court of law so the use of 'alleged' or 'once accused of' needs to precede 'rapist'.

« Last Edit: April 16, 2012, 12:29:03 PM by WilliamPowell »

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40205
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #512 on: April 16, 2012, 12:28:28 PM »
Question answered by the fact I've had to delete it  :banghead :banghead

The answer GR12 has given 100% spot on

Bottom line is you cannot post a rumour or rumours unless you have absolute proof of its truth. And that proof will stand up in a court of law

You can also not accuse someone of something illegal without proof.

Ox, in the example you used & I removed the person you named was not be found guilty of any charges so therefore under the law you cannot accuse them of something they have not be found guilty of in a court of law.

If you do so then legally under the defamation laws as they stand in this country then can not only sue the person who posted the comment be sued but also the owners of the web-site and the site shut down.

I know you disagree with the law Ox but it is what it is but outside of not being prepared to open ourselves to litigation we are not prepared to jeapordise this web-site or its future under any circumstances

Can we make it any clearer?
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #513 on: April 16, 2012, 12:43:02 PM »
Question answered by the fact I've had to delete it  :banghead :banghead

The answer GR12 has given 100% spot on

Bottom line is you cannot post a rumour or rumours unless you have absolute proof of its truth. And that proof will stand up in a court of law

You can also not accuse someone of something illegal without proof.

Ox, in the example you used & I removed the person you named was not be found guilty of any charges so therefore under the law you cannot accuse them of something they have not be found guilty of in a court of law.

If you do so then legally under the defamation laws as they stand in this country then can not only sue the person who posted the comment be sued but also the owners of the web-site and the site shut down.

I know you disagree with the law Ox but it is what it is but outside of not being prepared to open ourselves to litigation we are not prepared to jeapordise this web-site or its future under any circumstances

Can we make it any clearer?

Personally I think its illegal that Daniel Jackson is allowed to walk onto the paddock and attempt to impersonate an AFL footballer. I think it is referred to as "J walking".

There are injustices everywhere these days and some are defendable in a court of law, but alas, Daniel Jackson will continue to commit his crime unabated and unhindered and at the expense of my own sanity.

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #514 on: April 16, 2012, 12:46:13 PM »
An observation.

Connors has lost a poot-load of muscle mass over the last 2 years, FACT. How is this possible at his age?

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #515 on: April 16, 2012, 12:58:59 PM »
An observation.

Connors has lost a poot-load of muscle mass over the last 2 years, FACT. How is this possible at his age?
U r joking right..... He never had much muscle mass

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #516 on: April 16, 2012, 04:44:56 PM »
Question answered by the fact I've had to delete it  :banghead :banghead

The answer GR12 has given 100% spot on

Bottom line is you cannot post a rumour or rumours unless you have absolute proof of its truth. And that proof will stand up in a court of law

You can also not accuse someone of something illegal without proof.

Ox, in the example you used & I removed the person you named was not be found guilty of any charges so therefore under the law you cannot accuse them of something they have not be found guilty of in a court of law.

If you do so then legally under the defamation laws as they stand in this country then can not only sue the person who posted the comment be sued but also the owners of the web-site and the site shut down.

I know you disagree with the law Ox but it is what it is but outside of not being prepared to open ourselves to litigation we are not prepared to jeapordise this web-site or its future under any circumstances

Can we make it any clearer?

Personally I think its illegal that Daniel Jackson is allowed to walk onto the paddock and attempt to impersonate an AFL footballer. I think it is referred to as "J walking".

There are injustices everywhere these days and some are defendable in a court of law, but alas, Daniel Jackson will continue to commit his crime unabated and unhindered and at the expense of my own sanity.

This is a funny post
as his bio on twitter lists him as a "professional footballer"" LOL

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #517 on: April 16, 2012, 05:19:39 PM »
 ;D its ok WP l say nothing to get you into the poohole. My daughter is a lawyer if you ever need her  ;D

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #518 on: April 16, 2012, 05:25:15 PM »
An observation.

Connors has lost a poot-load of muscle mass over the last 2 years, FACT. How is this possible at his age?
U r joking right..... He never had much muscle mass

He never had much, but now he looks sickly skinny.

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #519 on: April 16, 2012, 05:34:25 PM »
An observation.

Connors has lost a poot-load of muscle mass over the last 2 years, FACT. How is this possible at his age?
U r joking right..... He never had much muscle mass

He never had much, but now he looks sickly skinny.

 ;D  :help

Online taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2047
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #520 on: April 16, 2012, 07:21:48 PM »
Wow, I started this thread because i was happy for the kid to be playing again

Obviously the people saying he has lost a lot of muscle mass did NOT see him on Saturday arvo as he looked in top condition ( hope that didnt sound gay !!!)

Offline TFL

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 851
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #521 on: April 16, 2012, 07:31:15 PM »
DC has the worst attitude that i have ever seen.

He can be as conditioned as he wants, wont make a difference.

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #522 on: April 16, 2012, 07:45:15 PM »
DC has the worst attitude that i have ever seen.

He can be as conditioned as he wants, wont make a difference.

Correct !

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #523 on: April 16, 2012, 08:03:50 PM »
wayne carey , gary ablett snr, fevola, pike, gherig,  hall, amongst 100s of ex player had bad attitude and egos , who gives a f, if DC can get his body right and win games for us with his footy smarts and skill , thats all that matters
ffs not everyone can be a saint

Online taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2047
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: Daniel Connors
« Reply #524 on: April 16, 2012, 08:05:46 PM »
wayne carey , gary ablett snr, fevola, pike, gherig,  hall, amongst 100s of ex player had bad attitude and egos , who gives a f, if DC can get his body right and win games for us with his footy smarts and skill , thats all that matters
ffs not everyone can be a saint

Well said, just about exactly what I was about to post