Terry's Next Contract

[Tigermonk]

Terry Wallace next contract is with Centrelink 

[1965]

Terry Wallace next contract is with Centrelink 

Would have thought one of the radio stations would pick him up.

[1980]

So if we dont make the finals in 2009, how many posters on here believe Wallace should be given a contract extension?

Lets see who are the brave ones!

[Smokey]

Time to weigh up Jacks input.

Pluses
1. Posting in correct thread this time
2. Passion about his point of view
3. Some valid points

Minuses
1. Generalizations about ALL members of this forum
2. REPEDATIVE
3. Statements without the facts to back them up

Net Value    -    ZERO

Sorry Jack. If you get rid of the repeats it would have some value but as it is you are adding nothing to this tread.

My point of view is that we have a contract with the Wallace, we gave him 5 years (right or wrong) and so thats what he gets.  Do I like him? NO.  Do I like the game plan? NO  Do I agree with honouring contracts? YES.  Can I see light at end of the tunel?  YES.  Wallace has 8 + 22 + the finals we better be in next year. I will put my point of view on where to go then.

Fluffy, you're making MT's mistake.  Too much sense wasted on too little.  We can only hope that the ability to comprehend what people are actually saying, instead of hearing what they want to hear, sinks in to Tweedledum and Tweedledee one day but I won't hold my breath waiting.

[Smokey]

So if we dont make the finals in 2009, how many posters on here believe Wallace should be given a contract extension?

Lets see who are the brave ones!

If we don't make the finals in 2009 I don't think he should be given an extension.  Doesn't change my opinion on whether he should be allowed to coach until then however.

[jackstar]

how history repeats, we did the wrong thing keeping Spud on, this is no different.

[jackstar]

Terry Wallace next contract is with Centrelink 

Correct!

[Hes My Hero]

You would think that we would need to win between 14-16 games for Terry to be given a 2 Yr extension on his contract in 2009.
And yes i am very serious.
Of course that would only be if the board had/has not already identified a successor .

[Moi]

You wanna share that wink, HMH?

[Hes My Hero]

You wanna share that wink, HMH?

Sorry Moi i would hate to start up a rumour around here.
God knows we dont need another one.

[Moi]

You wanna share that wink, HMH?

Sorry Moi i would hate to start up a rumour around here.
God knows we dont need another one.

You know, where there's wink there's fire, HMH!

[jackstar]

 

[Fishfinger]

Ask you all this , why did we only get 72,000 at last weeks game.
Yep, cant stand Terry , but i am not the only one. Supporters are dropping off.
Ask anyone at the western bulldogs what they think of him.

It was 73,500.
Live against the gate on FoxSports1 wouldn't have helped. Still a fair crowd.

Haha! Yep, ask the Western Bulldogs.  That'll sway everyone. 

[Gordon Bennett]

Of course that would only be if the board had/has not already identified a predecessor.

The board knows the identity of Wallace's predecessor. His name is Danny Frawley.

Everything that comes out of Jack's mouth is 100% correct.

you're killing me, daniel. That's champagne comedy.

My opinion is irrevelant.

that's my whole point

[Infamy]

So if we dont make the finals in 2009, how many posters on here believe Wallace should be given a contract extension?

Lets see who are the brave ones!

I don't think it can be that clear cut, if Terry moves on a few more senior players left from the Fraudley era at the end of this year and plays more kids in their place, even if we miss the finals then I think he should still stay on. It does depend though, we need to show that we are playing with the intensity that we had earlier this year against Freo, Bulldogs, StKilda & Hawks. If we are still playing the same old useless players and the same uninspired football that we have for much of this year and still miss the finals then I agree he should go.