Author Topic: Future Father-Sons  (Read 16380 times)

Offline Fishfinger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2465
  • You can't put brains in an idiot
Re: Father-son rule may be eased down to 50 games
« Reply #60 on: May 21, 2008, 07:30:41 PM »

50 games would make more players available. Can anyone tell me whats happened to Trevor Pooles boy, not eligible under f/s coz hes dad only has 99 games lol ... but at 50 games he would  be eligible and last I heard he was considered a decent prospect.
At 50 games he would also be eligible to be taken F/S by Geelong.
It's 50 of one and half a dozen of the other - Don Scott

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58063
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Future Father-Sons
« Reply #61 on: May 22, 2008, 04:41:49 AM »
Razor was another 99 gamer.

The big carrot in the change IMV is the 2nd rounder limit. If you're near the top of the ladder by 2010-11 you could still score a gun via the F/S for a mid-30 pick to offset the new teams having the top 5 picks to themselves.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Online wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8417
  • In Absentia
Re: Future Father-Sons
« Reply #62 on: July 04, 2008, 09:18:08 AM »
Am I right in thinking that Kane Lucas can come to us as a father/son pick?

There is video of him on the Bigpond site.

9.   Kane Lucas – 188cm, 79kg
http://bigpondvideo.com/AFLTV/63164
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline Obelix

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Future Father-Sons
« Reply #63 on: July 04, 2008, 09:45:32 AM »
Not sure mate.  I think there was some excitement/confusion six months ago and it was eventually confirmed that he wasn't a Richmond F/S.  Would love that to be wrong.

Online wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8417
  • In Absentia
Re: Future Father-Sons
« Reply #64 on: July 04, 2008, 09:54:51 AM »
Not sure mate.  I think there was some excitement/confusion six months ago and it was eventually confirmed that he wasn't a Richmond F/S.  Would love that to be wrong.

I just read that his old man played a few games for South Melbourne.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Future Father-Sons
« Reply #65 on: July 04, 2008, 11:06:19 AM »
Never want to see another father/son player at Punt rd as long as l'm alive

Offline Fishfinger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2465
  • You can't put brains in an idiot
Re: Future Father-Sons
« Reply #66 on: July 04, 2008, 11:19:58 AM »
Sorry to hear that, TM. I was hoping you'd scrape through to 50.  ;D
It's 50 of one and half a dozen of the other - Don Scott

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Future Father-Sons
« Reply #67 on: July 04, 2008, 11:30:55 AM »
Sorry to hear that, TM. I was hoping you'd scrape through to 50.  ;D

  ;D

Gordon Bennett

  • Guest
Re: Future Father-Sons
« Reply #68 on: July 05, 2008, 11:16:24 AM »
Never want to see another father/son player at Punt rd as long as l'm alive
not even a son of Wayne?

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Future Father-Sons
« Reply #69 on: July 05, 2008, 01:51:01 PM »
CORRECT No father / son at all

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Future Father-Sons
« Reply #70 on: July 05, 2008, 02:48:21 PM »
CORRECT No father / son at all

Son of Richo?

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95683
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Josh Free
« Reply #71 on: October 28, 2008, 04:34:03 AM »
Josh Free came 4th in North Ballarat Rebels B&F and was also named joint best first year player in his first year in the TAC Cup.

1 Hooper, Andrew    188
2 McKenzie, Ryan     169
3 Roughead, Jordan  168
4 Free, Josh              157   - picked up votes in 10 of the 20 games.
5 Tate, Oliver            156
6 Weadon, Bryn        152
7 Suban, Nick           109

http://www.sportingpulse.com/club_info.cgi?c=0-3020-27610-67827-8058800

Online wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8417
  • In Absentia
Re: Future Father-Sons
« Reply #72 on: October 28, 2008, 09:10:36 AM »
What a bugger with these new father/son rules.

Geelong got to clean up on them with 3rd rounders.

Now if Free is a gun, we have to use our first rounder on him.

The only way we get a steal is if he is a clear number 1 pick and we have pick 12-16.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Future Father-Sons
« Reply #73 on: October 28, 2008, 09:34:21 AM »
What a bugger with these new father/son rules.

Geelong got to clean up on them with 3rd rounders.

Now if Free is a gun, we have to use our first rounder on him.

The only way we get a steal is if he is a clear number 1 pick and we have pick 12-16.

He's not a gun.  Yet.

He's a just a hard at it in and under toiler that is shorter than 175cm.

I think the father son rule will serve us just fine on this one if we decide to draft him.
EAT EM ALIVE!

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4261
Re: Future Father-Sons
« Reply #74 on: October 28, 2008, 12:21:03 PM »
When will he be eliable for the draft?

Stripes