Wallace has had too much to say in recruiting over the last 4 years and thats been the biggest problem.
Wallace = McMahon, Mark Graham, Kent Kingsley.
March wont let it continue and rightfully so!
Using that argument... how do we rate these...
Wallace = Cotchin, Deledio, Tambling, McGuane, Reiwoldt, White, Thursfield, Rance, Connors, Polo, Pattison
On a scale of A to E with A being the best possible result and E the worst Id reckon
Cotchin = A [he was a top 2 pick so we should have gotten an A grade player]
Deledio = A [he was the top selection so we should have gotten a A grade player]
Tambling = C [Selected at 4, hasnt lived up to a top 4 pick expectation yet]
McGuane= B [Selected in the 30s, being a latish pick its a B result, hes going ok]
Riewoldt= C [Selected in first 15 picks, going ok, C is a fair result]
White= B [Selected in PSD, Bargain pick, Going ok at Present, Gets a B because he was such a late pick]
Thursfield= A [Bargain pick, a great get, Gets an A]
Rance= Unknown, hasnt played yet
Conners= C [Picked in the 50s, going ok just, can play, can easily get to B with 20 game next season]
Polo= C-/D [Picked at 20, has stalled imho]
Pattison= C-/D [Picked at 16, tries really hard, has played games, not sure going forward
A=3, B=2, C=3, C-/D=2. I reckon its just a pass. JUST