One-Eyed Richmond Forum

Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on December 14, 2012, 05:02:32 AM

Title: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: one-eyed on December 14, 2012, 05:02:32 AM
Champion Data has rated our list as 10th best.


HOW YOUR CLUB RATES

HAWTHORN                   Defenders 2nd               Midfield / Rucks 9th             Forwards 1st              LIST QUALITY 1st

WEST COAST                  Defenders 4th               Midfield / Rucks 7th             Forwards 4th             LIST QUALITY 2nd

SYDNEY                          Defenders 3rd               Midfield / Rucks 2nd             Forwards 11th            LIST QUALITY 3rd

FREMANTLE                    Defenders 10th              Midfield / Rucks 5th             Forwards 3rd             LIST QUALITY 4th

COLLINGWOOD              Defenders 5th               Midfield / Rucks 1st             Forwards 14th           LIST QUALITY 5th

ADELAIDE                        Defenders 6th               Midfield / Rucks 4th             Forwards 7th            LIST QUALITY 6th

GEELONG                        Defenders 1st               Midfield / Rucks 8th            Forwards 12th            LIST QUALITY 7th

ESSENDON                      Defenders 7th              Midfield / Rucks 10th            Forwards 5th             LIST QUALITY 8th

CARLTON                       Defenders 14th               Midfield / Rucks 3rd            Forwards 2nd             LIST QUALITY 9th

RICHMOND                   Defenders 13th                Midfield / Rucks 6th             Forwards 6th            LIST QUALITY 10th

NORTH MELBOURNE      Defenders 11th              Midfield / Rucks 11th            Forwards 9th             LIST QUALITY 11th

ST KILDA                         Defenders 8th              Midfield / Rucks 13th            Forwards 13th           LIST QUALITY 12th

MELBOURNE                   Defenders 12th             Midfield / Rucks 16th            Forwards 8th             LIST QUALITY 13th

BRISBANE                        Defenders 9th              Midfield / Rucks 14th           Forwards 15th            LIST QUALITY 14th

WESTERN BULLDOGS      Defenders 17th            Midfield / Rucks 15th           Forwards 10th            LIST QUALITY 15th

GOLD COAST                   Defenders 15th             Midfield / Rucks 17th           Forwards 16th           LIST QUALITY 16th

PORT ADELAIDE              Defenders 18th             Midfield / Rucks 12th           Forwards 17th            LIST QUALITY 17th

GREATER WESTERN SYDNEY Defenders 16th        Midfield / Rucks 18th          Forwards 18th             LIST QUALITY 18th

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Champion Data says Alastair Clarkson will coach the most talented list in 2013 as the Hawks seek redemption for last season's heartbreak at the hands of Sydney.

The 2013 AFL Prospectus - the ultimate number-cruncher for football fanatics - has laid bare the quality of each club's playing roster.

Using Champion Data rankings points as a base, for the first time players who played at least five games in the last two years have been given a value.

The top ranked player in each position is rated at 100 points and the bottom rated at zero points, with every other player assessed relative to those in the same position and scaled to fit in-between.

Gold Coast's Gary Ablett, for example, is the top-ranked midfielder and judged to be worth 100 points. The fact the next best onballer, Collingwood's Scott Pendlebury, is back on 92 points highlights how far ahead Ablett is.

Hawthorn's galaxy of stars has given it an average player rating of 56.34 - ranked No.1 in the AFL. The Hawks have star power on every line and have taken their vulnerable defence to a No.2 ranking by acquiring Brian Lake.

But the sleeping giant may well be West Coast, who rank second on the quality index at 54.98. The Eagles bat deep, with 17 players ranking in the top 35 per cent of their positions - two more than any other club.

Premier Sydney sit third with an equal league-low 28 players fitting the five-game criteria in the last two years, highlighting its injury management or good luck.

Incredibly, the Swans have only five players - Jude Bolton, Jarrad McVeigh, Andrejs Everitt, Gary Rohan and Lewis Jetta - who were taken in the top 20 of a national draft when originally brought into the AFL system.

They have killed the bottom-out theory up.

Fremantle are a surprise fourth, driven by a much-improved midfield and a forward line ranked third in the competition despite a lack of key position power.

Collingwood sit fifth, but look ominous. The battle-hardened Pies are now the No.1 list for experience, while remaining only the fifth oldest.

The Magpies boast the best midfield in the AFL with Pendlebury and Dane Swan, but there are questions over their forward line, which ranks just 14th.

Carlton is ninth on the quality ladder and while its midfield strength is no secret (ranked third), its forward line was surprisingly judged to be the second-best in the league.

Jarrad Waite, Eddie Betts and Jeff Garlett boost the Blues' rating, but with Waite often injured and without a legitimate back-up, lack of depth may become an issue.

- 2013 AFL PROSPECTUS order at championdata.com.au for $39.95 (RRP). Free delivery for pre-orders before Christmas (within Australia). Deliveries around mid-January, in bookstores February.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/afl/hawks-boast-afls-top-list-but-eagles-are-set-to-soar/story-e6frf9io-1226536434200
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: yellowandback on December 14, 2012, 06:05:14 AM
I'm surprised our forwards are ranked that high and defence that low but overall rating is about right
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Ruanaidh on December 14, 2012, 06:15:06 AM
Where we will improve dramatically this year is in defence with the addition of a fit Grimes and Chappy. Therefore, sixth would be closer to our actual  position in 2013 ... .. at least I hope it is.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: smasha on December 14, 2012, 10:59:47 AM
This is a good indicator of where we need to be.
Not far off actually(the Data I mean).

Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: MintOnLamb on December 14, 2012, 11:01:45 AM
If we can improve 1 we will be ninth......again

I think we are better than that BUT it is an honest appraisal without any fluff to try to unashamedly sell more copies of the Herald Sun in the first few weeks of the season by pumping up Richmonds chances
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Crazy_Ivan on December 14, 2012, 11:18:18 AM
How the hell do carlton have the 2nd ranked Fwd line?Surely taking the pee. :huh
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Phil Mrakov on December 14, 2012, 11:20:12 AM
Stopped reading at Essendon 8th
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Smokey on December 14, 2012, 11:36:09 AM
Just shows how stats can be misleading if you present them a certain way.

Melbourne, a side that leaked goals more than every side bar GWS and Suns are rated 12th for Defenders - ahead of us and Carlton - even though they had 398 more points than us and 416 more than Carlton, kicked against them for the year.

And conversely Carlton, a side who finished 11th in total points scored for the year is rated 2nd for forwards, ahead of North (9th) who scored 280 more points and Adelaide (6th) who scored 349 more points than them for the year.

Heap of crap if you ask me.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 14, 2012, 11:39:15 AM
Agree with our man Smoke

Champion Data is the new Dungeons & Dragons

Rot
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Stripes on December 14, 2012, 12:25:57 PM
This is a great help ranking players and teams....for Fantasy Competitions but we all know that statistics do not tell the full story. A player like Grimes who spoils all day but doesn't get as much possessions as a player like Houli would be ranked lower than him as a defender. Similarly defensive forwards are not rated.

Really you can't rank a team on individual efforts. It takes a variety of players all playing their role and all working for each other to make a strong team.

Good for Supercoach though! :)
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: dwaino on December 14, 2012, 03:23:52 PM
Agree with our man Smoke

Champion Data is the new Dungeons & Dragons

Rot

 >:(

We'll settle that over a 2d20.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: WilliamPowell on December 14, 2012, 06:26:16 PM
Just shows how stats can be misleading if you present them a certain way.

Melbourne, a side that leaked goals more than every side bar GWS and Suns are rated 12th for Defenders - ahead of us and Carlton - even though they had 398 more points than us and 416 more than Carlton, kicked against them for the year.

And conversely Carlton, a side who finished 11th in total points scored for the year is rated 2nd for forwards, ahead of North (9th) who scored 280 more points and Adelaide (6th) who scored 349 more points than them for the year.

Heap of crap if you ask me.

 :clapping :clapping
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 14, 2012, 08:06:07 PM
What a bloody joke , defense 13th, try rance grimes chappy and morris for size, thats top 5 by most reckoning :shh
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 14, 2012, 08:11:25 PM
What a bloody joke , defense 13th, try rance grimes chappy and morris for size, thats top 5 by most reckoning :shh

No it's not. Two of those players are average and the other two are good. Although Grimes is always injured.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: tony_montana on December 14, 2012, 09:14:15 PM
WGAF
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Danog on December 14, 2012, 10:00:03 PM
Agree with our man Smoke

Champion Data is the new Dungeons & Dragons

Rot

 >:(

We'll settle that over a 2d20.
I attack the darkness
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: dwaino on December 14, 2012, 10:54:18 PM
Agree with our man Smoke

Champion Data is the new Dungeons & Dragons

Rot

 >:(

We'll settle that over a 2d20.
I attack the darkness

 :laugh: 8-bit D&D?
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Danog on December 15, 2012, 02:43:24 AM
Agree with our man Smoke

Champion Data is the new Dungeons & Dragons

Rot

 >:(

We'll settle that over a 2d20.
I attack the darkness

 :laugh: 8-bit D&D?
You know it.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 15, 2012, 06:31:09 PM
What a bloody joke , defense 13th, try rance grimes chappy and morris for size, thats top 5 by most reckoning :shh

No it's not. Two of those players are average and the other two are good. Although Grimes is always injured.

Thats opinion matey, i took into account performance and best and fairest finish, our defenders were amongst best 10 players in the side and with the inclusion of chappy who is a seasoned performer, the news just gets better :clapping
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 15, 2012, 08:19:20 PM
What a bloody joke , defense 13th, try rance grimes chappy and morris for size, thats top 5 by most reckoning :shh

No it's not. Two of those players are average and the other two are good. Although Grimes is always injured.

Thats opinion matey, i took into account performance and best and fairest finish, our defenders were amongst best 10 players in the side and with the inclusion of chappy who is a seasoned performer, the news just gets better :clapping

WGAF about B&F results in bottom 8 sides? Milne finished 15th in St Kilda's B&F, does that mean he's an average forward? Next time Petrie sees Rance coming towards him I can tell you he might just rub one out on the spot. Chappy is a seasoned squib. Grimes & Morris are guns. I'm looking forward to seeing what Griffo can do as a defender because Chappy will never be a top line player. Rance is solid but he can't play on the best. Griffo might be able to.

Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 15, 2012, 09:45:17 PM
What a bloody joke , defense 13th, try rance grimes chappy and morris for size, thats top 5 by most reckoning :shh

No it's not. Two of those players are average and the other two are good. Although Grimes is always injured.

Thats opinion matey, i took into account performance and best and fairest finish, our defenders were amongst best 10 players in the side and with the inclusion of chappy who is a seasoned performer, the news just gets better :clapping

WGAF about B&F results in bottom 8 sides? Milne finished 15th in St Kilda's B&F, does that mean he's an average forward? Next time Petrie sees Rance coming towards him I can tell you he might just rub one out on the spot. Chappy is a seasoned squib. Grimes & Morris are guns. I'm looking forward to seeing what Griffo can do as a defender because Chappy will never be a top line player. Rance is solid but he can't play on the best. Griffo might be able to.

Lol , rancer cant play on the best, he was in AA form for the best part of year until he ran out of steam, rewind the game on buddy and come back and talk :lol
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 15, 2012, 10:17:51 PM
What a bloody joke , defense 13th, try rance grimes chappy and morris for size, thats top 5 by most reckoning :shh

No it's not. Two of those players are average and the other two are good. Although Grimes is always injured.

Thats opinion matey, i took into account performance and best and fairest finish, our defenders were amongst best 10 players in the side and with the inclusion of chappy who is a seasoned performer, the news just gets better :clapping

WGAF about B&F results in bottom 8 sides? Milne finished 15th in St Kilda's B&F, does that mean he's an average forward? Next time Petrie sees Rance coming towards him I can tell you he might just rub one out on the spot. Chappy is a seasoned squib. Grimes & Morris are guns. I'm looking forward to seeing what Griffo can do as a defender because Chappy will never be a top line player. Rance is solid but he can't play on the best. Griffo might be able to.

Lol , rancer cant play on the best, he was in AA form for the best part of year until he ran out of steam, rewind the game on buddy and come back and talk :lol

God you talk absolute rubbish. Franklin got 20 disposals in the wet. Rance was never near All Australian and never will be because he's not good enough. You think he should be talked about like Glass, Richards, Rutten, Lake etc? He's not in their class. Stop overrating our players. Rewind the 4th quarter against North Melbourne, guy.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 16, 2012, 06:12:22 AM
I got one for ya, name 12 sides and their  4 defenders better than
Rance, grimes chappy and morris

This will be good :lol

Ps it was that wet that day that jack bagged 7, taking screamer after screamer ::)
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Mr Magic on December 16, 2012, 07:12:17 AM
Is Grimes available? I don't think we can rely on it at this stage.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 16, 2012, 08:24:59 AM
I got one for ya, name 12 sides and their  4 defenders better than
Rance, grimes chappy and morris

This will be good :lol

Ps it was that wet that day that jack bagged 7, taking screamer after screamer ::)

How about no? Name the quality defenders who are inferior to Troy Chaplin and Rance? Chaplin isn't a defender, he plays as a floater. Well he is a defender, just not a very good one. ;D You'd know this if you actually knew who he was before Richmond became interested :lol Good luck with your high expectations of him. I can't wait until the 2013 end of year reviews from you blokes. "Chappy just needs to be more consistent. He had some good games but also some poor ones, maybe a big pre-season will do the trick and he will come out firing in 2014". ;D

You are a fake supporter, BJ. You do not even have a membership. ;D

;D
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Eat_em_Alive on December 16, 2012, 09:06:28 AM
 :clapping ;D
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 16, 2012, 11:56:27 AM
I got one for ya, name 12 sides and their  4 defenders better than
Rance, grimes chappy and morris

This will be good :lol

Ps it was that wet that day that jack bagged 7, taking screamer after screamer ::)

How about no? Name the quality defenders who are inferior to Troy Chaplin and Rance? Chaplin isn't a defender, he plays as a floater. Well he is a defender, just not a very good one. ;D You'd know this if you actually knew who he was before Richmond became interested :lol Good luck with your high expectations of him. I can't wait until the 2013 end of year reviews from you blokes. "Chappy just needs to be more consistent. He had some good games but also some poor ones, maybe a big pre-season will do the trick and he will come out firing in 2014". ;D

You are a fake supporter, BJ. You do not even have a membership. ;D

;D

yeah only for 31 years now :shh, let me tell you something partner, now listen and listen good, the reason we failed to make finals this year had stuff all to do with our defence, with an overwhelming number of I50 ea week we simply couldnt kick goals. Id have less of a case if our forward line was ranked 13th. Now come nice and close so no -one else can hear....I wouldnt swap Rance Grimes chappy or morris  for the best 4 defenders from hawthorn or swans, you hear, so stick that in your pipe and smoke it :lol
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 16, 2012, 12:01:30 PM
I got one for ya, name 12 sides and their  4 defenders better than
Rance, grimes chappy and morris

This will be good :lol

Ps it was that wet that day that jack bagged 7, taking screamer after screamer ::)

How about no? Name the quality defenders who are inferior to Troy Chaplin and Rance? Chaplin isn't a defender, he plays as a floater. Well he is a defender, just not a very good one. ;D You'd know this if you actually knew who he was before Richmond became interested :lol Good luck with your high expectations of him. I can't wait until the 2013 end of year reviews from you blokes. "Chappy just needs to be more consistent. He had some good games but also some poor ones, maybe a big pre-season will do the trick and he will come out firing in 2014". ;D

You are a fake supporter, BJ. You do not even have a membership. ;D

;D

yeah only for 31 years now :shh, let me tell you something partner, now listen and listen good, the reason we failed to make finals this year had stuff all to do with our defence, with an overwhelming number of I50 ea week we simply couldnt kick goals. Id have less of a case if our forward line was ranked 13th. Now come nice and close so no -one else can hear....I wouldnt swap Rance Grimes chappy or morris  for the best 4 defenders from hawthorn or swans, you hear, so stick that in your pipe and smoke it :lol

No, mail is you're a troll. Anyway I will play along

Who said our backline is the reason we missed out on finals? I happen to think we have a much improved back half that is quite solid now. You said we have a top 5 backline. We don't. We have a top 5 midfield, a decent backline and 1 very good forward. Your last comment is so ridiculous it should not even be acknowledged.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 16, 2012, 12:01:56 PM
Ted Richards was a stuffing donkey for 80% of his career and poo truck rutten is adelaides version of chappy LMFAO

Rancer regularly beats the best in the bizz and he'll become more solid as he matures

Geez you talk some ass coach
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 16, 2012, 12:03:04 PM
Ted Richards was a stuffing donkey for 80% of his career and poo truck rutten is adelaides version of chappy LMFAO

Rancer regularly beats the best in the bizz and he'll become more solid as he matures

Geez you talk some ass coach

Poor WUM is gerks. Teddy Richards been fantastic since he went to Sydney.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 16, 2012, 12:03:41 PM
"Rancer" stuff me dead :lol
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 16, 2012, 12:06:09 PM
No he was poo at Sydney for his first few, guy
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 16, 2012, 12:11:21 PM
No he was poo at Sydney for his first few, guy

No he was actually a champ and always has been, guy.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 16, 2012, 12:15:25 PM
Unreal

About as factual as Rancer being AA
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 16, 2012, 12:17:07 PM
Unreal

About as factual as Rancer being AA

Not many duds KPD's get games in granny's. But there is big Schoenmakers...is he the gun Jack kicked 6 on
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Phil Mrakov on December 16, 2012, 12:23:20 PM
Unreal

About as factual as Rancer being AA

AA at Lowes
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 16, 2012, 12:23:38 PM
Teddy is a gun now, was a gimp for years guy
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 16, 2012, 12:26:40 PM
Teddy is a gun now, was a gimp for years guy

That's where you're wrong. He was never a gimp. He was inconsistent at Essendon but has become one of the games finest defenders at Sydney.

Guy
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 16, 2012, 12:36:46 PM
Oh he was a gimp alright

Gimped it up with the best gimps

Pappa Gimp  :cheers
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 16, 2012, 12:40:07 PM
The Gimps ;D
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 16, 2012, 03:35:59 PM
I got one for ya, name 12 sides and their  4 defenders better than
Rance, grimes chappy and morris

This will be good :lol

Ps it was that wet that day that jack bagged 7, taking screamer after screamer ::)

How about no? Name the quality defenders who are inferior to Troy Chaplin and Rance? Chaplin isn't a defender, he plays as a floater. Well he is a defender, just not a very good one. ;D You'd know this if you actually knew who he was before Richmond became interested :lol Good luck with your high expectations of him. I can't wait until the 2013 end of year reviews from you blokes. "Chappy just needs to be more consistent. He had some good games but also some poor ones, maybe a big pre-season will do the trick and he will come out firing in 2014". ;D

You are a fake supporter, BJ. You do not even have a membership. ;D

;D

yeah only for 31 years now :shh, let me tell you something partner, now listen and listen good, the reason we failed to make finals this year had stuff all to do with our defence, with an overwhelming number of I50 ea week we simply couldnt kick goals. Id have less of a case if our forward line was ranked 13th. Now come nice and close so no -one else can hear....I wouldnt swap Rance Grimes chappy or morris  for the best 4 defenders from hawthorn or swans, you hear, so stick that in your pipe and smoke it :lol

No, mail is you're a troll. Anyway I will play along

Who said our backline is the reason we missed out on finals? I happen to think we have a much improved back half that is quite solid now. You said we have a top 5 backline. We don't. We have a top 5 midfield, a decent backline and 1 very good forward. Your last comment is so ridiculous it should not even be acknowledged.

Well your mail is about as misguided as your comments , i know a couple of posters on here personally, tony motana , cub. Who could account for my accreditation.  Once you graduate from being more than a keyboard peeant you may develop a greater insight into what this games all about.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 16, 2012, 03:38:49 PM
Teddy is a gun now, was a gimp for years guy

That's where you're wrong. He was never a gimp. He was inconsistent at Essendon but has become one of the games finest defenders at Sydney.

Guy

 :lol...yeah right, how did he go against the tiges..he was lamentable at ESS on every measure, although he had a good haircut,if  thats what you were referring to
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: yandb on December 16, 2012, 09:15:24 PM
The dead give away that champion data's stats don't give accurate results is it rates Pendlbury second best midfielder to Ablett. While I rate Pendlbury in the top 5 he is definatly not second best.
It just goes to show just because you compile stats it doedn't mean they reflect reality.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: the claw on December 16, 2012, 10:26:44 PM
hmm exactly why stats should be taken with a grain of salt.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Penelope on December 16, 2012, 11:44:46 PM
you seem happy enough to use them when it suits your argument
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 16, 2012, 11:54:32 PM
I got one for ya, name 12 sides and their  4 defenders better than
Rance, grimes chappy and morris

This will be good :lol

Ps it was that wet that day that jack bagged 7, taking screamer after screamer ::)

How about no? Name the quality defenders who are inferior to Troy Chaplin and Rance? Chaplin isn't a defender, he plays as a floater. Well he is a defender, just not a very good one. ;D You'd know this if you actually knew who he was before Richmond became interested :lol Good luck with your high expectations of him. I can't wait until the 2013 end of year reviews from you blokes. "Chappy just needs to be more consistent. He had some good games but also some poor ones, maybe a big pre-season will do the trick and he will come out firing in 2014". ;D

You are a fake supporter, BJ. You do not even have a membership. ;D

;D

yeah only for 31 years now :shh, let me tell you something partner, now listen and listen good, the reason we failed to make finals this year had stuff all to do with our defence, with an overwhelming number of I50 ea week we simply couldnt kick goals. Id have less of a case if our forward line was ranked 13th. Now come nice and close so no -one else can hear....I wouldnt swap Rance Grimes chappy or morris  for the best 4 defenders from hawthorn or swans, you hear, so stick that in your pipe and smoke it :lol

No, mail is you're a troll. Anyway I will play along

Who said our backline is the reason we missed out on finals? I happen to think we have a much improved back half that is quite solid now. You said we have a top 5 backline. We don't. We have a top 5 midfield, a decent backline and 1 very good forward. Your last comment is so ridiculous it should not even be acknowledged.

Well your mail is about as misguided as your comments , i know a couple of posters on here personally, tony motana , cub. Who could account for my accreditation.  Once you graduate from being more than a keyboard peeant you may develop a greater insight into what this games all about.


:fishing

That was a clear windup and you fell for it. I know you're a Tiges man, just a dumb one. You've got no idea and it's obvious to all who read your posts, BJ. I'm guessing I played at a higher level than all of you gimps who refuse to look at some of our players without rose coloured glasses. Hey BJ, you PM me the clubs you played for and provide proof and I will do the same. Running someone down on the internet is easy from behind your keyboard, mate. At least I crossed the whiteline at a decent level
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 17, 2012, 12:05:53 AM
Teddy is a gun now, was a gimp for years guy

That's where you're wrong. He was never a gimp. He was inconsistent at Essendon but has become one of the games finest defenders at Sydney.

Guy

 :lol...yeah right, how did he go against the tiges..he was lamentable at ESS on every measure, although he had a good haircut,if  thats what you were referring to

He was BOG against us from memory and was All Australian this year. Was "Rancer"

Regards,
Keyboard peeant
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Penelope on December 17, 2012, 12:09:54 AM
 :lol

hey coach, how many times did you represent your state/territory?
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 17, 2012, 12:34:33 AM
:lol

hey coach, how many times did you represent your state/territory?

Never did. ;D I was water boy for a side in King Island
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Penelope on December 17, 2012, 12:55:53 AM
you need to play in a comp where the only selection criteria is if you can pay your own way, your in the team, then. ;)
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 17, 2012, 01:38:59 AM
It helps to have family members at board level or on the coaching staff too.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 17, 2012, 08:17:08 AM
Well if it means anything at all, I played F grade amateurs and came top 10 in reserves best and fairest , best clubman award and was a committeeman for 7 years. I was a bloody ordinary footballer but loved being a part of it. Ooh yeah i did win B&f for school third xviii in 1986
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 17, 2012, 09:00:01 AM
Well if it means anything at all, I played F grade amateurs and came top 10 in reserves best and fairest , best clubman award and was a committeeman for 7 years. I was a bloody ordinary footballer but loved being a part of it. Ooh yeah i did win B&f for school third xviii in 1986

No worries BJ :cheers I was just stirring ya before. You're a good bloke, I just don't agree with everything you write. ;D
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Judge Roughneck on December 17, 2012, 02:35:14 PM
U underrate ARance

What a bloody joke , defense 13th, try rance grimes chappy and morris for size, thats top 5 by most reckoning :shh

No it's not. Two of those players are average and the other two are good. Although Grimes is always injured.

Thats opinion matey, i took into account performance and best and fairest finish, our defenders were amongst best 10 players in the side and with the inclusion of chappy who is a seasoned performer, the news just gets better :clapping

WGAF about B&F results in bottom 8 sides? Milne finished 15th in St Kilda's B&F, does that mean he's an average forward? Next time Petrie sees Rance coming towards him I can tell you he might just rub one out on the spot. Chappy is a seasoned squib. Grimes & Morris are guns. I'm looking forward to seeing what Griffo can do as a defender because Chappy will never be a top line player. Rance is solid but he can't play on the best. Griffo might be able to.

Lol , rancer cant play on the best, he was in AA form for the best part of year until he ran out of steam, rewind the game on buddy and come back and talk :lol

God you talk absolute rubbish. Franklin got 20 disposals in the wet. Rance was never near All Australian and never will be because he's not good enough. You think he should be talked about like Glass, Richards, Rutten, Lake etc? He's not in their class. Stop overrating our players. Rewind the 4th quarter against North Melbourne, guy.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 17, 2012, 03:04:39 PM
Rancer  :cheers
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: tiga on December 17, 2012, 04:19:57 PM
Rancer  :cheers

"I'm you're Private Rancer, a Rancer for money,
I'll do what you want me to do.
I'm you're Private Rancer, a Rancer for money,
and any old Forward will do."  ;D



Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: dwaino on December 17, 2012, 05:02:41 PM
Rancer  :cheers

"I'm you're Private Rancer, a Rancer for money,
I'll do what you want me to do.
I'm you're Private Rancer, a Rancer for money,
and any old Forward will do."  ;D

oh hai, I drive Mistubishi Rancer <(^_^)>
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 17, 2012, 07:32:21 PM
Well if it means anything at all, I played F grade amateurs and came top 10 in reserves best and fairest , best clubman award and was a committeeman for 7 years. I was a bloody ordinary footballer but loved being a part of it. Ooh yeah i did win B&f for school third xviii in 1986

No worries BJ :cheers I was just stirring ya before. You're a good bloke, I just don't agree with everything you write. ;D

no worries, youd be crazy if you did, im only a salesman, what would I bloody know :lol
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: yellowandback on December 17, 2012, 08:34:20 PM
It helps to have family members at board level or on the coaching staff too.

Themselves fights words partner
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 17, 2012, 08:47:27 PM
U underrate ARance

What a bloody joke , defense 13th, try rance grimes chappy and morris for size, thats top 5 by most reckoning :shh

No it's not. Two of those players are average and the other two are good. Although Grimes is always injured.

Thats opinion matey, i took into account performance and best and fairest finish, our defenders were amongst best 10 players in the side and with the inclusion of chappy who is a seasoned performer, the news just gets better :clapping

WGAF about B&F results in bottom 8 sides? Milne finished 15th in St Kilda's B&F, does that mean he's an average forward? Next time Petrie sees Rance coming towards him I can tell you he might just rub one out on the spot. Chappy is a seasoned squib. Grimes & Morris are guns. I'm looking forward to seeing what Griffo can do as a defender because Chappy will never be a top line player. Rance is solid but he can't play on the best. Griffo might be able to.

Lol , rancer cant play on the best, he was in AA form for the best part of year until he ran out of steam, rewind the game on buddy and come back and talk :lol

God you talk absolute rubbish. Franklin got 20 disposals in the wet. Rance was never near All Australian and never will be because he's not good enough. You think he should be talked about like Glass, Richards, Rutten, Lake etc? He's not in their class. Stop overrating our players. Rewind the 4th quarter against North Melbourne, guy.


Ive just referenced rancers 2012 form against glass, rutten, lake and richards. He had more disposals, more i50s more contested ball, more uncontested ball, more marks, more tackles. What crack are you on when you say he s not in their class :lol
Title: above as in the last page
Post by: Judge Roughneck on December 17, 2012, 09:31:50 PM
More important- I'd argue he is equal or more tough/brave than any of the above.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 17, 2012, 11:49:56 PM
U underrate ARance

What a bloody joke , defense 13th, try rance grimes chappy and morris for size, thats top 5 by most reckoning :shh

No it's not. Two of those players are average and the other two are good. Although Grimes is always injured.

Thats opinion matey, i took into account performance and best and fairest finish, our defenders were amongst best 10 players in the side and with the inclusion of chappy who is a seasoned performer, the news just gets better :clapping

WGAF about B&F results in bottom 8 sides? Milne finished 15th in St Kilda's B&F, does that mean he's an average forward? Next time Petrie sees Rance coming towards him I can tell you he might just rub one out on the spot. Chappy is a seasoned squib. Grimes & Morris are guns. I'm looking forward to seeing what Griffo can do as a defender because Chappy will never be a top line player. Rance is solid but he can't play on the best. Griffo might be able to.

Lol , rancer cant play on the best, he was in AA form for the best part of year until he ran out of steam, rewind the game on buddy and come back and talk :lol

God you talk absolute rubbish. Franklin got 20 disposals in the wet. Rance was never near All Australian and never will be because he's not good enough. You think he should be talked about like Glass, Richards, Rutten, Lake etc? He's not in their class. Stop overrating our players. Rewind the 4th quarter against North Melbourne, guy.


Ive just referenced rancers 2012 form against glass, rutten, lake and richards. He had more disposals, more i50s more contested ball, more uncontested ball, more marks, more tackles. What crack are you on when you say he s not in their class :lol

What does any of that have to do with stopping? Nothing. Rance will finish up as a 3rd tall.

You should compare "Rancers" B&F results and AA numbers against those 4 duds.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 18, 2012, 12:46:45 AM
wazzup "coach"? rance in your pants?   :-*
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 18, 2012, 02:19:07 AM
Hi "gerks". I just found out that Brodie Holland averaged more disposals, inside 50s & uncontested ball than Tony Lockett.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 18, 2012, 08:05:49 AM
Hi "gerks". I just found out that Brodie Holland averaged more disposals, inside 50s & uncontested ball than Tony Lockett.
Funny thing is rancer played FB like glass lake richards et al...your silly example is like comparing a draught horse to a thoroughbred  ::)

Anymore pre christmas funnies :lol
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 18, 2012, 08:25:54 AM
Look, guy, this was the question, guy: "What does any of that have to do with stopping? Nothing. Rance will finish up as a 3rd tall. You should compare "Rancers" B&F results and AA numbers against those 4 duds."
Reply to that, don't pick and choose what you want to talk about. This discussion started when you said we had a top 5 back half. I will also have you know that Ken McGregor won more uncontested ball than John Coleman.

You are aware that Rance had more goals kicked on him than nearly every other player in the competition?
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Judge Roughneck on December 18, 2012, 09:16:04 AM
Source :thumbsup

Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 18, 2012, 09:20:33 AM
Only player to have more goals kicked on him was Davis from GWS (for obvious reasons). Look it up yourself if you don't believe me.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 18, 2012, 09:25:04 AM
"morning" coach
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Judge Roughneck on December 18, 2012, 09:26:53 AM
Only player to have more goals kicked on him was Davis from GWS (for obvious reasons). Look it up yourself if you don't believe me.

What is the top10

Davis is a.fair player

Rfc / gws similar young list I'm not shocked
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 18, 2012, 09:38:18 AM
"morning" coach

"Sorry" I forgot to call you last night, gerks.

Only player to have more goals kicked on him was Davis from GWS (for obvious reasons). Look it up yourself if you don't believe me.

What is the top10

Davis is a.fair player

Not sure of the top 10 but Alipate was in there  ;D
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 18, 2012, 09:39:17 AM
" ::)" "FFS"
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Yeahright on December 18, 2012, 10:44:57 AM
Have to agree, Rance is in their class  ;)
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: tony_montana on December 18, 2012, 11:37:55 AM
Needs to stop going to ground so easily during the contest if he wants to be elite. Very good first half of the year, fell away badly like the rest of the side after rnd 10 or so.

The reverse Coleman is a rubbish award btw, players like Scarlett and fletcher do well be they never take the number 1 fwd. also like to see the correlation between how many goals were kicked on each defender vs how many times the ball was directed to their direct opponents inside 50.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Judge Roughneck on December 18, 2012, 12:32:42 PM
Needs to stop going to ground so easily during the contest if he wants to be elite. Very good first half of the year, fell away badly like the rest of the side after rnd 10 or so.

The reverse Coleman is a rubbish award btw, players like Scarlett and fletcher do well be they never take the number 1 fwd. also like to see the correlation between how many goals were kicked on each defender vs how many times the ball was directed to their direct opponents inside 50.

And how many minuets played. Rance has missed not much football with injury.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: dwaino on December 18, 2012, 12:55:54 PM
I was at Subway the other day and the girl asked what sauce I wanted and I said Rance   :chuck
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 18, 2012, 01:13:36 PM
I was at Subway the other day and the girl asked what sauce I wanted and I said Rance   :chuck

that was the wrong rancer dwaino  :help
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: tiga on December 18, 2012, 04:07:55 PM
I was at Subway the other day and the girl asked what sauce I wanted and I said Rance   :chuck

favorite Band dwaino??  ;D

(http://i46.tinypic.com/18nhn6.jpg)
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: dwaino on December 18, 2012, 05:01:14 PM
I was at Subway the other day and the girl asked what sauce I wanted and I said Rance   :chuck

favorite Band dwaino??  ;D

(http://i46.tinypic.com/18nhn6.jpg)

I was thinking of something a little more high brow

(http://www.siennacoffee.com.au/images/products/ranciliosilvia2009.jpg)
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 18, 2012, 05:56:49 PM
Only player to have more goals kicked on him was Davis from GWS (for obvious reasons). Look it up yourself if you don't believe me.

you have a real knack of putting a pretty ordinary case togehter coach, say, dont become a defence lawyer :lol...so if Im compapring two FB and one has
More disposals
More marks
More i50's
More contested possies
More uncontested possies
& more tackles
how could you possibly conclude he is an inferior player,

what are you guaging, shoe size :whistle

gimmee a break, there should be a jokes forum elsewhere :lol
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 18, 2012, 06:01:15 PM
coach will cross the street to tell people his stats  :shh
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: dwaino on December 18, 2012, 06:09:22 PM
coach will cross the street to tell people his stats  :shh

Matt Dea stopped Coach in the street to ask him about those stats  :shh
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 18, 2012, 06:25:17 PM
coach will cross the street to tell people his stats  :shh

ive just got the popcorn and coke ready, waiting for coach to convince me matt whites a better player than gary ablett coz he has more knock ons or some other imaginary stat that cant be verified :lol...you guys are a laugh a minute
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 18, 2012, 08:47:22 PM
Which is why I'm a big jolly Rancer fan  :-*
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: the claw on December 18, 2012, 10:09:12 PM
im with coach the one area he should be excellent at hes poo. constantly misjudges the ball in the air. constantly falls over. constantly forced out of position by stronger opponents.
id take a bloke like glass everyday of the week in fact if rance showed just a few of glasses traits in the most important area of being a f/b id defend him. shocking f/b.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 18, 2012, 10:22:26 PM
Pretty sure most would take an AA premiership full back over a 22 yr old  :lol
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Judge Roughneck on December 18, 2012, 11:52:11 PM
France is 8 yrs younger
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: dwaino on December 19, 2012, 12:21:00 AM
France is 8 yrs younger

Bloody hell mate, how old is Glass then?!
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Judge Roughneck on December 19, 2012, 12:41:10 AM
31/32
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 19, 2012, 01:01:41 AM
Only player to have more goals kicked on him was Davis from GWS (for obvious reasons). Look it up yourself if you don't believe me.

you have a real knack of putting a pretty ordinary case togehter coach, say, dont become a defence lawyer :lol...so if Im compapring two FB and one has
More disposals
More marks
More i50's
More contested possies
More uncontested possies
& more tackles
how could you possibly conclude he is an inferior player,

what are you guaging, shoe size :whistle

gimmee a break, there should be a jokes forum elsewhere :lol

Then why isn't Rance the best player in the competition? If he is as good as those players I mentioned + he has fantastic stats and all that other rubbish, why is he not the greatest player in history? You keep forgetting one thing....HE'S A BLOODY DEFENDER. LMFAO @ saying Rance is better than other full backs because he average more inside 50's :lol The purpose of a key defender is to shut down an opposition forward. Sorry, but Rance couldn't beat my dead nan in the air let alone the best forwards in the comp. Glass, Lake, Taylor, Richards, Rutten, Gibson etc all do a much better job. To suggest otherwise is madness

I'm not even against Rance. He's improved and is solid. But stuff me, to suggest he is as good or better than blokes like Lake & Glass is insane
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 19, 2012, 01:05:59 AM
31/32

Rance is 22 and you say he's 8 years younger than Glass. Then you come back and say Glass is 32

I am dealing with some stuffing unreal characters in this thread

coach will cross the street to tell people his stats  :shh

ive just got the popcorn and coke ready, waiting for coach to convince me matt whites a better player than gary ablett coz he has more knock ons or some other imaginary stat that cant be verified :lol...you guys are a laugh a minute

Matt White has more inside 50's than Steve Morris. I have now come to the conclusion that Matt White = better defender than Steve Morris. You are gimping in this thread, BJ. Biggest gimp around. ;D
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Judge Roughneck on December 19, 2012, 01:34:34 AM
ARance 23 y 2 m

Glass 31 7 m

 :thumbsup

Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: dwaino on December 19, 2012, 06:58:02 AM
31/32

Rance is 22 and you say he's 8 years younger than Glass. Then you come back and say Glass is 32

I am dealing with some stuffing unreal characters in this thread


He said France, not Rance.   :banghead
Title: Re: above as in the last page
Post by: bojangles17 on December 19, 2012, 07:51:02 AM
More important- I'd argue he is equal or more tough/brave than any of the above.
give the man a cigar :clapping
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 19, 2012, 08:07:16 AM
im with coach the one area he should be excellent at hes poo. constantly misjudges the ball in the air. constantly falls over. constantly forced out of position by stronger opponents.
id take a bloke like glass everyday of the week in fact if rance showed just a few of glasses traits in the most important area of being a f/b id defend him. shocking f/b.

Perhaps if you saw him play more than once a year, you may be a little more objective  :lol
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 19, 2012, 08:25:10 AM
Only player to have more goals kicked on him was Davis from GWS (for obvious reasons). Look it up yourself if you don't believe me.

you have a real knack of putting a pretty ordinary case togehter coach, say, dont become a defence lawyer :lol...so if Im compapring two FB and one has
More disposals
More marks
More i50's
More contested possies
More uncontested possies
& more tackles
how could you possibly conclude he is an inferior player,

what are you guaging, shoe size :whistle

gimmee a break, there should be a jokes forum elsewhere :lol

Then why isn't Rance the best player in the competition? If he is as good as those players I mentioned + he has fantastic stats and all that other rubbish, why is he not the greatest player in history? You keep forgetting one thing....HE'S A BLOODY DEFENDER. LMFAO @ saying Rance is better than other full backs because he average more inside 50's :lol The purpose of a key defender is to shut down an opposition forward. Sorry, but Rance couldn't beat my dead nan in the air let alone the best forwards in the comp. Glass, Lake, Taylor, Richards, Rutten, Gibson etc all do a much better job. To suggest otherwise is madness

I'm not even against Rance. He's improved and is solid. But stuff me, to suggest he is as good or better than blokes like Lake & Glass is insane

Listen i dont want to lampoon you, who am i to judge your limitations, Funny how you cant keep the argument to a FB v FB ..obviously because it doesnt suit your BS story :lol. I'll give you one to think about, when the FB gets the pill 20 times a game and thrusts I50" it means the FF aint got it. Hey yeah, i didnt fink of dat.  :shh

Pm if you like and i'll do what i can with some basic IQ building blocks, only too happy to help
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 19, 2012, 08:45:21 AM
Banging my head against a wall here. There's no need to dish out insults here. It reflects very poorly on you mate.

Do you want your full back to have the ball in his hands (even though he is an average disposer of the football and poor decision maker) or do you want his best quality to be shutting down a gun forward? If it's the former then fair play to you, we just have different qualities we like in a KPD. It would appear All Australian selectors do too. Personally I would take a bloke like Presti over a bloke who might get 15 touches a game but still gets beaten badly by quality forwards.

Answer me this and don't ignore it; Is Rance a better DEFENDER than Ted Richards, Brian Lake, Darren Glass, Ben Rutten, Daniel Merrett etc? Don't tell me he average more inside 50's than those guys. If he plays on Drew Petrie, does he do a better job than those players I mentioned? Can those other guys keep Jay Schulz to under 13 marks and 4 goals? Because Rance can't. I'm not even bagging the bloke, he is a decent defender who has had to punch above his weight. You (as usual) are overrating our players and putting ridiculous expectations on them.

Regards,
Coach

Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: 1965 on December 19, 2012, 08:57:23 AM
Banging my head against a wall here. There's no need to dish out insults here. It reflects very poorly on you mate.

Regards,
Coach

very funny  :lol
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 19, 2012, 09:02:30 AM
Banging my head against a wall here. There's no need to dish out insults here. It reflects very poorly on you mate.

Regards,
Coach

very funny  :lol

V*

Have anything to contribute to the football discussion?


:cheers
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: tiga on December 19, 2012, 09:31:25 AM
Banging my head against a wall here. There's no need to dish out insults here. It reflects very poorly on you mate.

Regards,
Coach

very funny  :lol

Still relying on other people's content in order to justify your pointless existence on this forum 65? ::) Damn I hope the Mayan's are right and we won't have to put up with your side car comments for too much longer. Only two more sleeps folks.  :pray


Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on December 19, 2012, 09:36:17 AM
I'm counting down the seconds
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: JVT on December 19, 2012, 11:13:17 AM
Banging my head against a wall here. There's no need to dish out insults here. It reflects very poorly on you mate.

Regards,
Coach

very funny  :lol

Still relying on other people's content in order to justify your pointless existence on this forum 65? ::) Damn I hope the Mayan's are right and we won't have to put up with your side car comments for too much longer. Only two more sleeps folks.  :pray
Don't get your hopes up  :rollin
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: dwaino on December 19, 2012, 11:29:04 AM
Banging my head against a wall here. There's no need to dish out insults here. It reflects very poorly on you mate.

Regards,
Coach

very funny  :lol

Still relying on other people's content in order to justify your pointless existence on this forum 65? ::) Damn I hope the Mayan's are right and we won't have to put up with your side car comments for too much longer. Only two more sleeps folks.  :pray

Inb4  :sleep
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 19, 2012, 06:49:05 PM
31/32

Rance is 22 and you say he's 8 years younger than Glass. Then you come back and say Glass is 32

I am dealing with some stuffing unreal characters in this thread

coach will cross the street to tell people his stats  :shh

ive just got the popcorn and coke ready, waiting for coach to convince me matt whites a better player than gary ablett coz he has more knock ons or some other imaginary stat that cant be verified :lol...you guys are a laugh a minute

Matt White has more inside 50's than Steve Morris. I have now come to the conclusion that Matt White = better defender than Steve Morris. You are gimping in this thread, BJ. Biggest gimp around. ;D

what where you saying about insulting people, you are about as ernest as Julia Gillard, stand tall my friend and keep the BS aside and spare me from having to filter your posts :lol
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: the claw on December 20, 2012, 09:01:31 PM
im with coach the one area he should be excellent at hes poo. constantly misjudges the ball in the air. constantly falls over. constantly forced out of position by stronger opponents.
id take a bloke like glass everyday of the week in fact if rance showed just a few of glasses traits in the most important area of being a f/b id defend him. shocking f/b.

Perhaps if you saw him play more than once a year, you may be a little more objective  :lol
lol. prety poor come back. ive seen plenty of rance evry yr.  id say i saw more of him as a junior than anyone on this forum.

first and foremost lets get this straight i wanted us to take rance where we did i thought he would go earlier. i assumed he would not be there and wanted to use 18 on pears and 19 on collier when rance slipped that changed of course we went and traded pick 19 away we also traded out of pick 35 so at pick 51 i wanted cale hooker. theres a little background for you. in fact in 06 i wanted eric mckenzie with the pick we used on shane edwards tall defenders were a priority at the time imo. we didnt take a defender in 06 so 07 became an important yr to get a few.

its only since we have had him that a few pennys have dropped in regards to his strengths and weaknesses.
was always a very good rebounding defender. loved the way he moved and only had a small question over his skills. he seemed to shank  a fair few at full tilt. but looking back even then  he ws never a good player in the air.  i thought it was something that was more about the way he played than anything else.

since hes been with us i have every yr complained about him playing at f/b. every yr the same complaints come up. poor judge of the ball in the air,  falls over is not good one on one. is caught out of position far too often etc.  these are key traits of your f/b of any f/b worth his salt and rance just fails in these areas.
without a doubt he is more suited to a rebounding role its always been the case but as a rebounder i do have to question his hurt factor with ball in hand.

as i said i agree with coach on this what he has said is pretty spot on. i also agree about presti he was a very good stopping defender i would take him over rance anyday based on player strengths and weaknesses to perform the role.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 20, 2012, 09:51:32 PM
thats precisely what i said, youve barely seen him play in last couple of years, he s 10 times the player he was when he was drafted and had obvious flaws judging overhead...improved to a point he s taken more marks than any other FB in the comp...perhaps you should watch his 2012 tapes rather than U14s :lol
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: tony_montana on December 20, 2012, 09:56:05 PM
Rance is still young, his body on body work needs improvement but hes improved at it a lot the last couple of years and come from a long way back. Hes still only 22-23, another preseason or 2 and he'll be primed to hold his own against most KF's. Not sure why ppl are so eager to point out how deficient he is in the area, he's been punching above his weight and is the best we've had the past few years to play that role. Cut him some slack and dont be so eger to point out hes a gumby
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 20, 2012, 10:15:03 PM
TM, he had some real flaws in his game early on, and I gotta say id practically written him off, thinking all he had was courage. His composure and judgement in the air has improved markedly and for a defender , gee its up there. TBH my only knock on him is he can still look to bite off a bit more than he can chew at times, but being a more attacking defender you'll prob get that, Morris is in same boat. Chappy will prob be a good compliment as i dont expect he will be in same mould as these two
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Yeahright on December 21, 2012, 02:21:23 AM
Shouldn't be playing fullback. Not a knock on him but as you girls pointed out, his sloppy one on one and deep, but a good rebounder. His strengths and weaknesses don't equate to a FB for me.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: bojangles17 on December 21, 2012, 08:01:53 AM
I dont think he s sloppy one on one, that many times i recall him getting a timely fist when FF was on the lead and he has hands like a steel trap...i dont reckon there d be a defender in the league that took more marks.not too mention his contested.possie ...so far so good for a kpp ::)
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: tony_montana on December 21, 2012, 08:59:47 AM
He is a fullback, all you blokes saying he isn't have missed how easily he gets turned inside out and taken under the ball. As a CHB or floating HB he would get mauled, also gets lost in traffic, not worth the risk andhe still offers more rebound as a FB than any other FB so it's still a win in that regard.

 He gets the best results when he's running in a straight line on the leading forwards hammer, his closing speed and ability to get a fist in is already at a very very good standard, just needs to improve his one on one work for when the ball gets bombed deep in the square, (btw this is magnified when Grimes isnt playing, as Grimes comes in 3rd man up and takes the heat off him)But dear lord, he would get mauled standing at CHB.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Ruanaidh on December 21, 2012, 09:24:05 AM
He is a fullback, all you blokes saying he isn't have missed how easily he gets turned inside out and taken under the ball. As a CHB or floating HB he would get mauled, also gets lost in traffic, not worth the risk andhe still offers more rebound as a FB than any other FB so it's still a win in that regard.

 He gets the best results when he's running in a straight line on the leading forwards hammer, his closing speed and ability to get a fist in is already at a very very good standard, just needs to improve his one on one work for when the ball gets bombed deep in the square, (btw this is magnified when Grimes isnt playing, as Grimes comes in 3rd man up and takes the heat off him)But dear lord, he would get mauled standing at CHB.
I agree Tony. This is why we will persevere with the development of Griffiths at CHB. That and Griffs brilliant disposal by hand or foot.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: gerkin greg on December 21, 2012, 10:34:27 AM
Not convinced where his best position is but IMO his best ever game for the club was at FB against Jono Brown in 2011. That was an epic display and showed on his day he has the class to give the best a bath. Consistency is the key, but as pointed out the kid has just turned 23, learned his trade of fullback of the century Will Thursfield and the great Luke McGuane, and gets stuff all assistance down there on a more than regular basis. Has his weaknesses but also has a lot of strengths and I can't see us finding an upgrade on him, these guys don't grow on trees.
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Yeahright on December 21, 2012, 02:47:48 PM
I dont think he s sloppy one on one, that many times i recall him getting a timely fist when FF was on the lead and he has hands like a steel trap...i dont reckon there d be a defender in the league that took more marks.not too mention his contested.possie ...so far so good for a kpp ::)

Grimes averaged more marks ;)
Title: Re: Champion Data rates Richmond's list as 10th best ........... (Herald-Sun)
Post by: Coach on January 19, 2013, 12:12:10 PM
im with coach the one area he should be excellent at hes poo. constantly misjudges the ball in the air. constantly falls over. constantly forced out of position by stronger opponents.
id take a bloke like glass everyday of the week in fact if rance showed just a few of glasses traits in the most important area of being a f/b id defend him. shocking f/b.

Perhaps if you saw him play more than once a year, you may be a little more objective  :lol
lol. prety poor come back. ive seen plenty of rance evry yr.  id say i saw more of him as a junior than anyone on this forum.

first and foremost lets get this straight i wanted us to take rance where we did i thought he would go earlier. i assumed he would not be there and wanted to use 18 on pears and 19 on collier when rance slipped that changed of course we went and traded pick 19 away we also traded out of pick 35 so at pick 51 i wanted cale hooker. theres a little background for you. in fact in 06 i wanted eric mckenzie with the pick we used on shane edwards tall defenders were a priority at the time imo. we didnt take a defender in 06 so 07 became an important yr to get a few.

its only since we have had him that a few pennys have dropped in regards to his strengths and weaknesses.
was always a very good rebounding defender. loved the way he moved and only had a small question over his skills. he seemed to shank  a fair few at full tilt. but looking back even then  he ws never a good player in the air.  i thought it was something that was more about the way he played than anything else.

since hes been with us i have every yr complained about him playing at f/b. every yr the same complaints come up. poor judge of the ball in the air,  falls over is not good one on one. is caught out of position far too often etc.  these are key traits of your f/b of any f/b worth his salt and rance just fails in these areas.
without a doubt he is more suited to a rebounding role its always been the case but as a rebounder i do have to question his hurt factor with ball in hand.

as i said i agree with coach on this what he has said is pretty spot on. i also agree about presti he was a very good stopping defender i would take him over rance anyday based on player strengths and weaknesses to perform the role.

Claw, it's pointless arguing with someone who thinks any bloke the club drafts is a prodigy or a hidden gem that should have somehow gone in the first round. I mean seriously, Bojangles said the club fired Wallace because they read BJ's comments on here. He has no grip on reality and that's the way he likes it. Fair play to him as he is obviously enjoying living in his fantasy world. A world where "Rancer" is better than AA KPDs. There's no winning this argument.