One-Eyed Richmond Forum
Football => Richmond Rant => Topic started by: one-eyed on December 10, 2016, 07:06:08 PM
-
Yes, it's that time of the year again for the game that creates ever increasing passion and controversy each and every year we've done it :lol.
Same rules as last year to control our over-eagar posters ;).
* The current playing list has been split into 4 groups. I haven't included any newbie Tigers from this draft/trade period with the exception of Prestia and Caddy who are both high profile recruits.
Group A: Broad, Edwards, Elton, C.Ellis, Hunt, Miles, C.Moore, Rioli, Soldo, Vlastuin.
Group B: Castagna, Chol, Drummond, Grigg, Grimes, Houli, Lennon, McIntosh, Prestia, Riewoldt.
Group C: Batchelor, Butler, Cotchin, Griffiths, Hampson, Maric, Martin, Morris, Short.
Group D: Astbury, Caddy, Conca, B.Ellis, Lloyd, Lambert, Markov, Menadue, Rance, Townsend.
* For each group, one at a time, we vote in the same manner as before: +1 for one player and -1 for another. No 2's, 5's or 35's.
* The only voting restrictions are there needs to be a gap of 5 posters since you last voted before you can vote again OR a 24 hour gap (whichever comes first).
* Each player will start with 5 points. Players who reach zero points are eliminated. Players who reach 10 points qualify for the final 12. Voting for each group stops when 3 players have qualified and then we move onto the next group.
* When the top 3 from each of the 4 groups are known we'll then vote from the final 12 left to get a final winner who will be crowned OER's 2016 favourite player.
-
First up is Group A:
Broad 5
Edwards 5
C.Ellis 5
Elton 5
Hunt 5
Miles 5
C.Moore 5
Rioli 5
Soldo 5
Vlastuin 5
-
Rioli + 6
Elton - 4
-
Vlastuin + 6
Soldo - 4
-
So far:
Vlastuin 6
Rioli 6
Broad 5
Edwards 5
C.Ellis 5
Hunt 5
Miles 5
C.Moore 5
Soldo 4
Elton 4
-
Vlastuin 6
Rioli 7
Broad 5
Edwards 5
C.Ellis 5
Hunt 5
Miles 5
C.Moore 4
Soldo 4
Elton 4
-
Vlastuin 6
Rioli 8
Broad 5
Edwards 5
C.Ellis 5
Hunt 5
Miles 5
C.Moore 4
Soldo 4
Elton 3
-
+1 Vlastuin
-1 Edwards
Vlastuin 7
Rioli 8
Broad 5
Edwards 4
C.Ellis 5
Hunt 5
Miles 5
C.Moore 4
Soldo 4
Elton 3
-
Rioli +1
Moore -1
Rioli 9
Vlastuin 7
Broad 5
Edwards 4
C.Ellis 5
Hunt 5
Miles 5
Soldo 4
Elton 3
C.Moore 3
-
Miles +1
Hunt -1
Rioli 9
Vlastuin 7
Broad 5
Edwards 4
C.Ellis 5
Hunt 4
Miles 6
Soldo 4
Elton 3
C.Moore 3
-
Miles +1
Hunt -1
Rioli 9
Vlastuin 7
Broad 5
Edwards 4
C.Ellis 5
Hunt 3
Miles 7
Soldo 4
Elton 3
C.Moore 3
-
Vlastuin +1
Elton -1
Rioli 10
Vlastuin 8
Broad 5
Edwards 4
C.Ellis 5
Hunt 3
Miles 6
Soldo 4
Elton 2
C.Moore 3
-
Didn't take long for it to be stuffed up :lol
-
Vlastuin +1
Soldo -1
Rioli 9 (I think 10 is wrong)
Vlastuin 9
Broad 5
Edwards 4
C.Ellis 5
Hunt 3
Miles 6
Soldo 3
Elton 2
C.Moore 3
-
Miles should be on 7.
Rioli 9
Vlastuin 9
Miles 7
Broad 5
C.Ellis 5
Edwards 4
Hunt 3
Soldo 3
C.Moore 3
Elton 2
-
Soldo +1
Rioli -1
Vlastuin 9
Rioli 8
Miles 7
Broad 5
C.Ellis 5
Soldo 4
Edwards 4
Hunt 3
C.Moore 3
Elton 2
I have spoken
-
Why hasnt Rioli made it yet he was on 10 before
Rioli 10
Vlastuin 9
Miles 7
Broad 5
C.Ellis 5
Edwards 4
Hunt 3
Soldo 3
C.Moore 3
Elton 1
-
Why hasnt Rioli made it yet he was on 10 before
Rioli 10
Vlastuin 9
Miles 7
Broad 5
C.Ellis 5
Edwards 4
Hunt 3
Soldo 3
C.Moore 3
Elton 1
Maybe because he was erroneously put on 10?
Your post has just made a further error.....
-
Yep, I'm ignoring Dooks because he has royally stuffed it and it's correct as of Owls so including my votes it's....
Miles +1
Hunt -1
Vlastuin 9
Rioli 8
Miles 8
Broad 5
C.Ellis 5
Soldo 4
Edwards 4
Hunt 2
C.Moore 3
Elton 2
-
feckin eedjut Dooks, learn to count
-
Vlastuin 9
Rioli 9 +
Miles 8
Broad 5
C.Ellis 5
Soldo 4
Edwards 4
Hunt 1 -
C.Moore 3
Elton 2
-
feckin eedjut Dooks, learn to count
Wot? >:(
-
feckin eedjut Dooks, learn to count
Wot? >:(
:lol
-
LOL
-
I got this lads.....
Vlastuin 9
Rioli 10 +
Miles 8
Broad 5
C.Ellis 5
Soldo 4
Edwards 4
Hunt 0-
C.Moore 3
Elton 2
Goodbye to huffing Hunt.
Dedicated to all those fools who defended him in 2016 because 'he tried hard'
Lmfao
Where is you god now?
-
Is this like other years or can we vote up pretty much within reason?
-
Vlastuin 10 +
Rioli 10 +
Miles 8
Broad 5
C.Ellis 5
Soldo 4
Edwards 4
Hunt 0-
C.Moore 3
Elton 1 -
-
Vlastuin 10
Rioli 10
Miles 9+
Broad 5
C.Ellis 5
Soldo 4
Edwards 4
Hunt 0
C.Moore 3
Elton 0 -
-
Vlastuin 9
Rioli 10
Miles 9+
Broad 5
C.Ellis 5
Soldo 4
Edwards 4
Hunt 0-
C.Moore 4
Elton 0 -
-
Vlastuin 9 incorrect voting
Rioli 10
Miles 9+
Broad 5
C.Ellis 5
Soldo 4
Edwards 4
Hunt 0-
C.Moore 4 incorrect voting
Elton 0 -
HRT once a player hits 10 they are through to the next round and you cannot take points off them. Vlastuin is through
Please re cast your votes
As per YBB'S post current standings are:
Vlastuin 10
Rioli 10
Miles 9+
Broad 5
C.Ellis 5
Soldo 4
Edwards 4
Hunt 0
C.Moore 3
Elton 0 -
-
Miles 10 and through
Broad 5
C.Ellis 5
Soldo 4
Edwards 4
Hunt 0
C.Moore 2
Elton 0
-
2nd up is Group B:
Catagna 5
Choi 5
Drummond 5
Grigg 5
Grimes 5
Houli 5
Lennon 5
McIntosh 5
Prestia 5
Riewoldt 5
this group should be fun or could take a while :rollin
-
Jack + 6
Grigg - 4
All others 5 ....
-
Jack 7
Grigg 4
Houli 4
All others 5
-
Catagna 5
Choi 5
Drummond 5
Grigg 3-
Grimes 5
Houli 4
Lennon 5
McIntosh 5
Prestia 5
Riewoldt 8+
-
Catagna 5
Choi 5
Drummond 5
Grigg 3
Grimes 5
Houli 4
Lennon 5
McIntosh 5
Prestia 4-
Reiwoldt 9+
-
Castagna 5
Choi 5
Drummond 5
Grigg 2-
Grimes 5
Houli 4
Lennon 6+
McIntosh 5
Prestia 4
Reiwoldt 9
-
Castagna 5
Choi 5
Drummond 5
Grigg 2
Grimes 5
Houli 3
Lennon 6
McIntosh 5
Prestia 5
Reiwoldt 9
-
Jack +1 and through.
Drummond -1
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 5
Choi 5
Drummond 4
Grigg 2
Grimes 5
Houli 3
Lennon 6
McIntosh 5
Prestia 5
-
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 5
Choi 5
Drummond 4
Grigg 2
Grimes 5
Houli 2-
Lennon 6
McIntosh 5
Prestia 6+
-
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 5
Choi 5
Drummond 4
Grigg 1 -
Grimes 5
Houli 2-
Lennon 6
McIntosh 6 +
Prestia 6
-
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 6 +
Choi 5
Drummond 4
Grigg 1
Grimes 5
Houli 1 -
Lennon 6
McIntosh 6
Prestia 6
-
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 6 +
Choi 5
Drummond 4
Grigg 1
Grimes 5
Houli 0
Lennon 6
McIntosh 6
Prestia 7
Adios to the turnover king
-
Grimes +1
Drummond -1
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 6
Choi 5
Drummond 3
Grigg 1
Grimes 6
Lennon 6
McIntosh 6
Prestia 7
-
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 6
Choi 5
Drummond 3
Grigg 0-
Grimes 6
Lennon 7 +
McIntosh 6
Prestia 7
Farewell Grigg and goodnight Bents wherever you are..... :clapping
-
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 6
Choi 5
Drummond 3
Grigg 0
Grimes 6
Lennon 6
McIntosh 6
Prestia 8
-
How many posts are we suppossed to wait between each turn?
-
How many posts are we suppossed to wait between each turn?
5
-
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 6
Chol 5
Drummond 2 -
Grimes 6
Lennon 6
McIntosh 6
Prestia 9 +
-
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 6
Chol 5
Drummond 1 -
Grimes 6
Lennon 6
McIntosh 6
Prestia 10
-
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 6
Chol 5
Drummond 0
Grimes 6
Lennon 6
McIntosh 7
Prestia 10
-
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 6
Chol 5
Drummond 0
Grimes 5 -
Lennon 6
McIntosh 8 +
Prestia 10
-
Reiwoldt 11+
Castagna 6
Dr Chil 4
Grimes 5
Lennon 6
McIntosh 8 +l
Prestia 10
-
Reiwoldt 11+
Castagna 6
Dr Chil 4
Grimes 5
Lennon 6
McIntosh 8 +l
Prestia 10
Once you get to 10, you are through HRT. No need to go to 11 IIRC.
-
Reiwoldt 11+
Castagna 6
Dr Chil 4
Grimes 5
Lennon 6
McIntosh 8 +l
Prestia 10
Once you get to 10, you are through HRT. No need to go to 11 IIRC.
Absolutely correct YBB,
2nd time HRT has done this
Current tally is:
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 6
Chol 5
Drummond 0
Grimes 5 -
Lennon 6
McIntosh 8 +
Prestia 10
-
Sorry 'bout that lads.
I'll remember for my next post.
It does however underline the strength of my convictions ;D
-
Everybody keep voting. Its going to damn slow. >:(
-
With Lids gone I have no one to vote against.
:lol
-
Everybody keep voting. Its going to damn slow. >:(
That's what my girlfriend sez
-
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 6
Chol 5
Drummond 0
Grimes 6 +
Lennon 6
McIntosh 7-
Prestia 10
-
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 7+
Chol 5
Grimes 6
Lennon 5-
McIntosh 7
Prestia 10
-
Reiwoldt 10
Castagna 7
Chol 5
Grimes 6
Lennon 4
McIntosh 8
Prestia 10
-
With Lids gone I have no one to vote against.
:lol
Shame on you
-
Reiwoldt 10
Cantstandya 6-
Chol 5
Grimes 6
Lennon 5+
McIntosh 8
Prestia 10
-
Reiwoldt 10
Cantstandya 6
Chol 5
Grimes 6
Lennon 4-
McIntosh 9+
Prestia 10
-
Reiwoldt 10
Cantstandya 6
Chol 5
Grimes 5 -
Lennon 4
McIntosh 10+
Prestia 10
Kam through :clapping
So from this group
Jack, Kam & Dion through
Next up group 3 ;D
-
Group 3 ( this will be fun :lol)
Group C:
Batchelor 5
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Hampson 5
Maric 5
Martin 5
Morris 5
Short 5
-
Do we have to take anyone from this group?
-
Do we have to take anyone from this group?
What is wrong with Dusty? :huh
-
I know this is against the rules but sometimes principles are more important than consequences:-
Batchelor 5
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Hampson 0
Maric 5
Martin 5
Morris 5
Short 5
-
Batchelor 6 +
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Hampson -1 -
Maric 5
Martin 5
Morris 5
Short 5
-
Ok banter over
Starting from now:
Batchelor 5
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Hampson 5
Maric 5
Martin 5
Morris 5
Short 5
I'll kick it off
Batchelor 5
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Hampson 4 -
Maric 6 +
Martin 5
Morris 5
Short 5
-
Batchelor 5
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Hampson 3 -
Maric 6
Martin 6 +
Morris 5
Short 5
-
Batchelor 6+
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Hampson 2 -
Maric 6
Martin 6
Morris 5
Short 5
-
Dusty +1
Morris -1
Batchelor 6
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Hampson 2
Maric 6
Martin 7
Morris 4
Short 5
-
Batch+1
Hamspud -1
Batchelor 7
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Hampson 1
Maric 6
Martin 7
Morris 4
Short 5
-
Batchelor 7
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Hamspudoff 0-
Maric 6
Martin 8+
Morris 4
Short 5
-
Batchelor 6-
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Maric 6
Martin 9+
Morris 4
Short 5
-
Batchelor 7
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Hampson -1
Maric 6
Martin 9
Morris 4
Short 5
-
Batchelor 7
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Hampson -1
Maric 6
Martin 9
Morris 4
Short 5
The above is wrong, moving right along
Currently tally is:
Batchelor 6-
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Maric 6
Martin 9+
Morris 4
Short 5
And after I vote it becomes
Batchelor 6
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Maric 7 +
Martin 9
Morris 3 -
Short 5
-
Batchelor 7
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Maric 7
Martin 9
Morris 2
Short 5
-
Batchelor 8+
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Maric 7
Martin 8-
Morris 2
Short 5
-
Batchelor 7 -
Butler 5
Cotchin 6 +
Griffiths 5
Maric 7
Martin 8
Morris 2
Short 5
-
Batchelor 8 +
Butler 5
Cotchin 6
Griffiths 5
Maric 6 -
Martin 8
Morris 2
Short 5
-
Batchelor 7 -
Butler 5
Cotchin 6
Griffiths 5
Maric 6
Martin 9 +
Morris 2
Short 5
-
Batchelor 8 +
Butler 5
Cotchin 6
Griffiths 5
Maric 6
Martin 8-
Morris 2
Short 5
-
Batchelor 8 +
Butler 5
Cotchin 6
Griffiths 5
Maric 6
Martin 8-
Morris 2
Short 5
Sorry Chunky
You've voted to early
Needs to be 5 voters before you can vote again
-
Batchelor 8 +
Butler 5
Cotchin 6
Griffiths 5
Maric 6
Martin 8-
Morris 2
Short 5
Sorry Chunky
You've voted to early
Needs to be 5 voters before you can vote again
I'm bored and it's going too slow
-
Batchelor 8 +
Butler 5
Cotchin 6
Griffiths 5
Maric 6
Martin 8-
Morris 2
Short 5
Sorry Chunky
You've voted to early
Needs to be 5 voters before you can vote again
I'm bored and it's going too slow
You're sleeping it down with your voting! If you vote for Dusty it will speed up! ;D
-
Batchelor 8 +
Butler 5
Cotchin 6
Griffiths 5
Maric 6
Martin 8-
Morris 2
Short 5
Sorry Chunky
You've voted to early
Needs to be 5 voters before you can vote again
I'm bored and it's going too slow
Ps don't worry about the fat slur it will be true by the end of the Xmas break
-
Cmon lets keep it to the voting. Whos next so i can go
-
Batchelor 6 -
Butler 5
Cotchin 6
Griffiths 5
Maric 6
Martin 10 +
Morris 2
Short 5
-
Batchelor 6
Butler 5
Cotchin 6
Griffiths 5
Maric 7 +
Martin 10 +
Morris 1 -
Short 5
-
Damo took two points off batch. Should be 7 prior to my vote. ****
Batchelor 8+
7+
Butler 5
Cotchin 6
Griffiths 5
Maric 7
Martin 10
Morris 0-
Short 5
-
Batchelor 8+
Butler 5
Cotchin 5-
Griffiths 5
Maric 7
Martin 10
Morris 0
Short 5
-
Batchelor 9+
Butler 5
Cotchin 5
Griffiths 5
Maric 6-
Martin 10
Morris 0
Short 5
-
Batchelor 9
Butler 5
Cotchin 6+
Griffiths 5
Maric 5-
Martin 10
Morris 0
Short 5
-
Damo took two points off batch. Should be 7 prior to my vote.
Batchelor 8+
Butler 5
Cotchin 6
Griffiths 5
Maric 7
Martin 10
Morris 0-
Short 5
Sorry Dooks you are incorrect. Demo's votes are correct.
Chuck voted early so his votes don't count. Damo took the vote tally from YBB'S tally which is correct
Tally of votes should always be in units of 5. Your tally makes the total votes 46, it should be 45
I will adjust everything to put us back in balance ;D
-
OK after making all the necessary adjustments
Current tally is
Batchelor 9
Butler 5
Cotchin 6+
Griffiths 5
Maric 5-
Martin 10
Morris 0
Short 5
-
Batchelor 8-
Butler 5
Cotchin 7+
Griffiths 5
Maric 5
Martin 10
Short 5
-
Batchelor 9
Butler 5
Cotchin 6
Griffiths 5
Maric 5
Martin 10
Short 5
[/quote]
-
Batchelor 10+
Butler 5
Cotchin 5-
Griffiths 5
Maric 5
Martin 10
Short 5
-
Batchelor 10+
Butler 5
Cotchin 5-
Griffiths 5
Maric 5
Martin 10
Short 5
Too early again Chucky! >:(
-
Batchelor 10+
Butler 5
Cotchin 5-
Griffiths 5
Maric 5
Martin 10
Short 5
Too early again Chucky! >:(
I counted WPs post as a vote
Oh well at least he didn't call me fat again
-
Batchelor 10+
Butler 5
Cotchin 5-
Griffiths 5
Maric 5
Martin 10
Short 5
Too early again Chucky! >:(
I counted WPs post as a vote
Oh well at least he didn't call me fat again
Umm....
My post wasn't me voting pud ;D
-
Batchelor 10+
Butler 5
Cotchin 5-
Griffiths 5
Maric 5
Martin 10
Short 5
Too early again Chucky! >:(
I counted WPs post as a vote
Oh well at least he didn't call me fat again
So chunky, you can carve it!
(https://overland.org.au/wp-content/chum1_large.jpg)
-
Batchelor 9
Butler 5
Cotchin 6
Griffiths 5
Maric 5
Martin 10
Short 5
Ooch here's Dooks post which is the latest status
-
Batchelor 8-
Butler 5
Cotchin 7+
Griffiths 5
Maric 5
Martin 10
Short 5
-
A reminder you can't vote for players once they reach 10 as they are already through.
Also no changing of votes at a later date as that only confuses the situation.
As you were with MT's post the last valid vote.
-
Martin 10
Cotchin 8+
Batchelor 7-
Butler 5
Griffiths 5
Maric 5
Short 5
-
Cotchin 9
Batchelor 8+
Butler 5
Griffiths 5
Maric 4-
Short 5
-
Cotchin 9
Batchelor 9 +
Butler 5
Griffiths 4 -
Maric 4
Short 5
-
Cotchin 9
Batchelor 10+
Butler 4-
Griffiths 4
Maric 4
Short 5
-
Cotchin 9
Batchelor 10+
Butler 4-
Griffiths 4
Maric 4
Short 5
Is Batchelor officially through?
We have a dearth of HBF's on this list
-
Apologies for earlier confusion. A few seasonal tipples blunted my judgement
Cotchin 10
Batchelor 10
Butler 4
Griffiths 3
Maric 4
Short 5
And thats group 3 done i think?
-
Yep, Group 3 is done - Dusty, Cotch & Batch through.
Onto Group D:
Astbury 5
Caddy 5
Conca 5
B.Ellis 5
Lloyd 5
Lambert 5
Markov 5
Menadue 5
Rance 5
Townsend 5
-
Onto Group D:
Astbury 5
Caddy 5
Conca 5
B.Ellis 4 -
Lloyd 5
Lambert 5
Markov 6 +
Menadue 5
Rance 5
Townsend 5
;D
-
Astbury 5
Caddy 5
Conca 5
B.Ellis 4
Lloyd 5
Lambert 4 -
Markov 6
Menadue 5
Rance 6 +
Townsend 5
-
Astbury 5
Caddy 5
Conca 6+
B.Ellis 4
Lloyd 5
Lambert 3 -
Markov 6
Menadue 5
Rance 6
Townsend 5
-
I take it that a different group = you dont have to wait 5 posts.
Astbury 5
Caddy 5
Conca 6
B.Ellis 3-
Lloyd 5
Lambert 3
Markov 6
Menadue 5
Rance 7+
Townsend 5
-
Astbury 5
Caddy 5
Conca 6
B.Ellis 3
Lloyd 5
Lambert 2-
Markov 6
Menadue 6+
Rance 7
Townsend 5
-
Astbury 5
Caddy 5
Conca 6
B.Ellis 3
Lloyd 6+
Lambert 2
Markov 6
Menadue 6
Rance 7
Townsend 4-
-
Astbury 4 -
Caddy 5
Conca 6
B.Ellis 3
Lloyd 6
Lambert 2
Markov 7 +
Menadue 6
Rance 7
Townsend 4
;D
-
Astbury 4
Caddy 5
Conca 6
B.Ellis 3
Lloyd 6
Lambert 2
Markov 7
Menadue 6
Rance 8 +
Townsend 3 -
;D
[/quote]
-
Astbury 4
Caddy 5
Conca 7+
B.Ellis 3
Lloyd 6
Lambert 2
Markov 7
Menadue 6
Rance 8
Townsend 2-
-
Astbury 4
Caddy 4-
Conca 8+
B.Ellis 3
Lloyd 6
Lambert 2
Markov 7
Menadue 6
Rance 8
Townsend 2
-
Astbury 4
Caddy 4
Conca 8
B.Ellis 2-
Lloyd 6
Lambert 2
Markov 7
Menadue 6
Rance 9+
Townsend 2
-
Astbury 4
Caddy 4
Conca 8
B.Ellis 2
Lloyd 6
Lambert 1-
Markov 7
Menadue 6
Rance 10+
Townsend 2
-
Astbury 3 -
Caddy 4
Conca 8
B.Ellis 2
Lloyd 6
Lambert 1
Markov 8 +
Menadue 6
Rance 10
Townsend 2
-
24 hours since my last post
Astbury 2 -
Caddy 4
Conca 9+
B.Ellis 2
Lloyd 6
Lambert 1
Markov 8
Menadue 6
Rance 10
Townsend 2
-
The final 12 is going to be interesting.....
-
Astbury 2
Caddy 4
Conca 9
B.Ellis 2
Lloyd 7+
Lambert 1
Markov 8
Menadue 6
Rance 10
Townsend 1-
-
Astbury 2
Caddy 3-
Conca 10+
B.Ellis 2
Lloyd 7
Lambert 1
Markov 8
Menadue 6
Rance 10
Townsend 1
-
Astbury 2
Caddy 3
Conca 10
B.Ellis 2
Lloyd 7
Lambert 1
Markov 9+
Menadue 6
Rance 10
Townsend 0-
-
24 hours since my last vote ;D
Astbury 2
Caddy 3
Conca 10
B.Ellis 1 -
Lloyd 7
Lambert 1
Markov 10 +
Menadue 6
Rance 10
Townsend 0-
This group done
Through are
Mrakov
Rance
Conca
:clapping
-
I'll kick off the final 12:-
Miles 4-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 5
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 5
Martin 5
Cotchin 5
Batchelor 6+
Rance 5
Conca 5
Mrakov 5
-
I'll kick off the final 12:-
Miles 4
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4-
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 5
Martin 5
Cotchin 5
Batchelor 6
Rance 6+
Conca 5
Mrakov 5
-
I'll kick off the final 12:-
Miles 4
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 5
Martin 5
Cotchin 5
Batchelor 7+
Rance 5-
Conca 5
Mrakov 5
-
Miles 4
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 5
Martin 5
Cotchin 6+
Batchelor 7
Rance 5
Conca 4-
Mrakov 5
-
Miles 4
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 5
Martin 5
Cotchin 6
Batchelor 8+
Rance 5
Conca 3-
Mrakov 5
-
Miles 4
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 5
Martin 5
Cotchin 6
Batchelor[only cause we have no one else on hbf] 9+
Rance 5
Plonca 2-
Mrakov 5
-
Miles 4
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6+
Martin 5
Cotchin 6
Batchelor[only cause we have no one else on hbf] 9
Rance 5
Plonca 2-
Mrakov 4-
-
Miles 3-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 6
Batchelor 10+
Rance 5
Plonca 2
Mrakov 4
-
Miles 3
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 6
Batchelor 9-
Rance 6+
Plonca 2
Mrakov 4
-
Miles 3
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 6
Batchelor 10+
Rance 5-
Plonca 2
Mrakov 4
-
Miles 3
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 6
Batchelor 10
Rance 5
Plonca 1 -
Mrakov 5 +
-
Miles 3
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 6
Batchelor 10
Rance 5
Plonca 0 -
Mrakov 6 +
-
Miles 2-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 6
No other option down back 11
Rance 5
Plonca 0
Mrakov 6
-
Miles 1-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 6
Jake (plays small or tall) Batchelor 12+
Rance 5
Mrakov 6
-
24 hours have passed
Miles 1
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 5 -
Jake (plays small or tall) Batchelor 12
Rance 5
Mrakov 7 +
-
Miles 0-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 5
Jake (plays small or tall) Batchelor 12
Rance 5
Mrakov 8+
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 5
Batchelor 13+
Rance 4-
Mrakov 8
-
24 hours
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 5
Batchelor 14+
Rance 3-
Mrakov 8
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7+
Martin 5
Cotchin 5
Batchelor 14
Rance 3
Mrakov 7-
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 3-
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 5
Cotchin 5
Once you've had Batch, you'll never look back(ch) 15+
Rance 3
Mrakov 7
-
+1 Jehovah
-1 The bloke with the strange first name
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 2
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 5
Cotchin 5
Once you've had Batch, you'll never look back(ch) 15
Rance 4
Mrakov 7
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 1 -
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 5
Cotchin 5
Batch - the greatest ever - 16 +
Rance 4
Mrakov 7
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 1
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 5
Cotchin 5
Batch 17 +
Rance 3 -
Mrakov 7
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
McIntosh 0-
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 5
Cotchin 5
Batch 18+
Rance 3
Mrakov 7
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6 -
Martin 5
Cotchin 5
Batch 18+
Rance 3
Mrakov 8+
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 4-
GOAT HBF 19+
Rance 3
Mrakov 8
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 4
Batchelor 20
Rance 2
Mrakov 8
-
24hrs
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 4
Batchelor 21+
Rance 1-
Mrakov 8
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 6
Martin 5
Cotchin 4
Batchelor 22 +
Rance 0-
Mrakov 8
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7+
Martin 4-
Cotchin 4
Batchelor 22
Rance 0
Mrakov 8
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 5
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 4
Cotchin 3 -
Batchelor 22
Mrakov 9 +
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 4
Cotchin 3 -
Batchelor 23
Mrakov 9 +
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 3
Cotchin 3
Batchelor 24
Mrakov 9
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 2
Cotchin 3
Batchelor 25
Mrakov 9
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 2
Cotchin 2-
Batchelor 26+
Mrakov 9
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 2
Cotchin 1-
The Real Package 27+
Mrakov 9
-
24 hours
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 1-
Cotchin 1
Batchelor 28
Mrakov 9
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 1
Cotchin 0 CYA
Batchelor 28
Mrakov 10
-
24 hours
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 0-
Cotchin 1
Batchelor 29+
Mrakov 9
-
24 hours
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 0-
Cotchin 1
Batchelor 29+
Mrakov 9
What are you doing Dooks?
Cotchin is out, you seem to have given him and Batch a vote each
-
Apologies - went off chucks as the last vote, deliberated for a while and hit post but you must have snuck in before me.
My votes post yours WP are:-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 4
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Martin 0
Batchelor 30
Mrakov 10
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 3-
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 7
Graeme Landy Jnr 31
Mrakov 10
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 3
Riewoldt 5
Prestia 8
Graeme Landy Jnr 31
Mrakov 9
-
Rioli 5
Vlastuin 3
Riewoldt 4
Prestia 8
Snatchelor 32
Mrakov 9
-
Rioli 6+
Vlastuin 3
Riewoldt 4
Prestia 8
Snatch 31-
Mrakov 9
-
Rioli 7+
Vlastuin 3
Riewoldt 4
Prestia 8
Batch 30-
Mrakov 9
-
Rioli 7
Vlastuin 3
Riewoldt 3-
Prestia 8
Batch 31+
Mrakov 9
-
Rioli 7
Vlastuin 2-
Riewoldt 3
Prestia 8
The Lord Our Saviour 32+
Mrakov 9
-
Rioli 8+
Vlastuin 2
Riewoldt 3
Prestia 8
This vote is for WAT 31-
Mrakov 9
-
Rioli 8
Vlastuin 2
Riewoldt 2
Prestia 8
Backch 32
Mrakov 9
-
Rioli 9+
Vlastuin 2
Riewoldt 2
Prestia 8
Backch 31-
Mrakov 9
-
Just quietly there is an extra vote in here.
It should be adding up to 60 not 61
-
Just quietly there is an extra vote in here.
It should be adding up to 60 not 61
Yes. The Dookster added an extra vote for Batchelor after he said he stuffed up on the previous page. Couldn't be bothered bringing it up at the time as maths does not seem to be his strongest suit. :shh
-
Just quietly there is an extra vote in here.
It should be adding up to 60 not 61
Yes. The Dookster added an extra vote for Batchelor after he said he stuffed up on the previous page. Couldn't be bothered bringing it up at the time as maths does not seem to be his strongest suit. :shh
>:(
Calm down Dr Whinge. I can do maffs:-
Corrected by subtracting 1 from Batch, and adding my votes +1 Batch and -1 Riewoldt.
Rioli 9
Vlastuin 2
Riewoldt 1
Prestia 8
Batch 31
Mrakov 9
-
Rioli 9
Vlastuin 2
Riewoldt 1
Prestia 8
Batch 30 -
Mrakov 10 +
;D
-
Rioli 10+
Vlastuin 2
Riewoldt 1
Prestia 8
Batch 29 -
Mrakov 10
-
Rioli 10
Vlastuin 2
Riewoldt 0
Prestia 8
Batch 30
Mrakov 10
-
Rioli 11+
Vlastuin 2
Riewoldt 0
Prestia 8
Batch 29-
Mrakov 10
-
Rioli 11
Vlastuin 1-
Prestia 8
Batch 30+
Mrakov 10
-
Rioli 11
Vlastuin 0
Prestia 8
Batch 31+
Mrakov 10
-
24 hours
Rioli 10
Prestia 8
Batch 32
Mrakov 10
-
Rioli 11+
Prestia 8
Batch 31-
Mrakov 10
-
Rioli 10
Prestia 8
Batch 32
Mrakov 10
-
Rioli 9
Prestia 8
Batch 33
Mrakov 10
:clapping
-
Rioli 9
Prestia 7
G Abletts secret love child 34
Mrakov 10
-
Rioli 9
Prestia 7
G Abletts secret love child 33 -
Mrakov 11 +
-
Rioli 9
Prestia 7
BIG BOY 34
Mrakov 10
YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!
-
Rioli 8
Prestia 7
Batch 35
Mrakov 10
-
Rioli 9
Prestia 7
BIG BOY 34
Mrakov 10
YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!
Sorry Sweetheart, but you can't vote again until 5 others have voted or 24 hours have passed since your last vote.
-
Rioli 9
Prestia 7
BIG BOY 34
Mrakov 10
YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!
Sorry Sweetheart, but you can't vote again until 5 others have voted or 24 hours have passed since your last vote.
Correct so taking the tally after I voted and applying Chuck's we have:
Current tally is
Rioli 9 8 -
Prestia 7
Batch 34 +
Mrakov 11
** Corrected as per Dookie's post below
-
Rioli 9
Prestia 7
BIG BOY 34
Mrakov 10
YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!
Sorry Sweetheart, but you can't vote again until 5 others have voted or 24 hours have passed since your last vote.
Correct so taking the tally after I voted and applying Chuck's we have:
Current tally is
Rioli 9 -
Prestia 7
Batch 34 +
Mrakov 11
Rioli should be 8.
-
Rioli 8
Prestia 7
Batch 33-
Mrakov 12+
-
Rioli 7
Prestia 7
Batch 34
Mrakov 12
-
Rioli 7
Prestia 6-
Batchymumma 35+
Mrakov 12
-
Rioli 6
Prestia 6
The nullifier 36
Mrakov 12
-
Rioli 6
Prestia 6
Batchelor 35 -
Mrakov 13 +
-
Rioli 6
Prestia 6
Batchelor 36
Mrakov 12
:)
-
Rioli 6
Prestia 6
Batchelor 35-
Mrakov 13+
-
Rioli 5
Prestia 6
Beastchelor 36
Mrakov 13
-
Rioli 6
Prestia 6
Batch 35
Mrakov 13
-
Rioli 5
Prestia 6
Jake Lambert 36
Mrakov 13
-
LOL
-
Rioli 5
Prestia 6
Batchelor 36+
Mrakov 12-
-
Rioli 5
Prestia 6
Batchelor 37+
Mrakov 11-
-
Correction to the scoring Batchelor should be 1+
Rioli 5
Prestia 6
Batchelor 38
Mrakov 11
-
Rioli 5
Prestia 6
Batchelor 37-
Mrakov 12+
-
Rioli 5
Prestia 6
Batchelor 38
Mrakov 11
:rollin
-
Rioli 5
Prestia 6
Batchelor 37 -
Mrakov 12 +
;D
-
Rioli 4-
Prestia 6
Jake Spatula (cause he turns it over) ;D 38+
Mrakov 12
-
Rioli 3
Prestia 6
Batch 39
Mrakov 12
-
Rioli 3
Prestia 6
Batch 40
Mrakov 11
-
Rioli 4+
Prestia 6
Batch 39-
Mrakov 11
-
Rioli 4
Prestia 6
Batch 40
Mrakov 10
-
Rioli 4
Prestia 6
Batch 39
Mrakov 11
;D
-
Rioli 4
Prestia 6
Batch 38
Mrakov 12
-
Rioli 3
Prestia 6
Batch 39
Mrakov 12
-
Rioli 4
Prestia 6
Batch 38
Mrakov 12
-
Rioli 5+
Prestia 6
Batch 37-
Mrakov 12
-
Rioli 4
Prestia 6
Batch 38
Mrakov 12
-
Batchelor favourite.
Markov not spelled correctly.
LMAO WHAT IS THIS?
-
Rioli 4
Prestia 6
Batch 39
Mrakov 11
-
Rioli 3-
Prestia 6
Batch 40+
Mrakov 11
-
Batchelor favourite.
Markov not spelled correctly.
LMAO WHAT IS THIS?
Our voting for the annual player sponsorship that this forum funds
-
Rioli 2
Prestia 6
Batch 41
Mrakov 11
-
Rioli 2
Prestia 6
Batch 40
Mrakov 12
-
Batchelor favourite.
Markov not spelled correctly.
LMAO WHAT IS THIS?
Our voting for the annual player sponsorship that this forum funds
So wouldn't Rioli or Markov be much more deserving of a player sponsorship than guy who has been on the list for 6 years...... :banghead
-
Batchelor favourite.
Markov not spelled correctly.
LMAO WHAT IS THIS?
Our voting for the annual player sponsorship that this forum funds
So wouldn't Rioli or Markov be much more deserving of a player sponsorship than guy who has been on the list for 6 years...... :banghead
Batch is going to have his break out year, all he needs is some support FFS.
So prescribe some uppers and get aboard the Batch train
-
Batchelor favourite.
Markov not spelled correctly.
LMAO WHAT IS THIS?
Our voting for the annual player sponsorship that this forum funds
So wouldn't Rioli or Markov be much more deserving of a player sponsorship than guy who has been on the list for 6 years...... :banghead
Then why did you keep repeat voting for Vlastuin over Soldo early in the piece? FFS you cant have it both ways Doc.
Vote #1 Batch and watch how good a year he will have with our sponsorship and support :gotigers
-
Batchelor favourite.
Markov not spelled correctly.
LMAO WHAT IS THIS?
Our voting for the annual player sponsorship that this forum funds
So wouldn't Rioli or Markov be much more deserving of a player sponsorship than guy who has been on the list for 6 years...... :banghead
Then why did you keep repeat voting for Vlastuin over Soldo early in the piece? FFS you cant have it both ways Doc.
Vote #1 Batch and watch how good a year he will have with our sponsorship and support :gotigers
Soldo is a rookie. Not even on the main list.
Maybe that came into my calculations....
-
Rioli 1
Prestia 6
Batch 41
Mrakov 12
-
Rioli 0-
Prestia 6
Batch 42+
Mrakov 12
-
Rioli 0-
Prestia 6
Batch 42+
Mrakov 12
:clapping
-
Prestia 6
Batch 41
Mrakov 13
-
Batchelor favourite.
Markov not spelled correctly.
LMAO WHAT IS THIS?
Our voting for the annual player sponsorship that this forum funds
So wouldn't Rioli or Markov be much more deserving of a player sponsorship than guy who has been on the list for 6 years...... :banghead
Batch is going to have his break out year, all he needs is some support FFS.
So prescribe some uppers and get aboard the Batch train
Exactly. :cheers
I'm expecting Marcus Welby to put his hand in his pocket as well.
-
Prestia6
Batch 40 -
Mrakov 14 +
And FWIW this forum doesn't and has never sponsored a player. There absolutely no plans to do so in the future
-
Prestia6
Batch 40 -
Mrakov 14 +
And FWIW this forum doesn't and has never sponsored a player. There absolutely no plans to do so in the future
Do you think this stunning result is worthy of an exception? Shouldn't we have a vote on it?
-
Prestia6
Batch 40 -
Mrakov 14 +
And FWIW this forum doesn't and has never sponsored a player. There absolutely no plans to do so in the future
Do you think this stunning result is worthy of an exception? Shouldn't we have a vote on it?
No
And BTW Batch has at least 1 player sponsor for 2017.
Actually all players do
-
I think players can have two player sponsors though. IIRC Cotch did in his early days.
Some food for thought anyways WP.
-
Prestia6
Batch 41 get him a sponsorship
Mrakov 11
-
I think players can have two player sponsors though. IIRC Cotch did in his early days.
Some food for thought anyways WP.
Players can have up to 6 sponsors
You collect the $1500 needed and go ahead, you can sort out: how to collect the $$, sort out out the person who gets to go to the dinner, the BBQ, and locker vieiwng.
but whatever you do it won't be under the name of OER
-
Prestia 6
Batch 4O
Markov 12
-
Prestia 5
The Man 41
Mrarkov 12
-
Prestia 4
Butch 42
Mrarkrov 12
-
Prestia 3-
OER inaugural player sponsor elect 43+
Imelda Mrarkov 12
-
Prestia 3
Batch 42 -
Mrarkov 13 +
-
I think players can have two player sponsors though. IIRC Cotch did in his early days.
Some food for thought anyways WP.
Players can have up to 6 sponsors
You collect the $1500 needed and go ahead, you can sort out: how to collect the $$, sort out out the person who gets to go to the dinner, the BBQ, and locker vieiwng.
but whatever you do it won't be under the name of OER
Why not?
Where is the OER constitution?
Surely the will of the forum members should determine that decision?
Or are you going to do a "Peggy" and decide for us?
-
I think players can have two player sponsors though. IIRC Cotch did in his early days.
Some food for thought anyways WP.
Players can have up to 6 sponsors
You collect the $1500 needed and go ahead, you can sort out: how to collect the $$, sort out out the person who gets to go to the dinner, the BBQ, and locker vieiwng.
but whatever you do it won't be under the name of OER
Why not?
Where is the OER constitution?
Surely the will of the forum members should determine that decision?
Or are you going to do a "Peggy" and decide for us?
As opposed to Peggy and the RFC, the site belongs to WP & OE/MT. They make the rules. As forum members we can visit and post within their rules. I realise you are taking the pee here but still it's not up to them to reply to "jokes" like this, with all due respect.
-
I'm not taking pee. There's a sticky on the board which was a discussion on the 3 strikes policy. A good debate which all good forums need. You don't move on if you reflect your own views all the time. I think that this would be another good debate, after all, what's the big deal in sponsoring the forums favourite player if you can raise the funds?
-
I'm not taking pee. There's a sticky on the board which was a discussion on the 3 strikes policy. A good debate which all good forums need. You don't move on if you reflect your own views all the time. I think that this would be another good debate, after all, what's the big deal in sponsoring the forums favourite player if you can raise the funds?
We have had this discussion in the past, a number of times and it's been decided not to do it.
If people from here want to get together and sponsor a player then that's fine.
But it wont it happen under the the banner of OER. It has to fall outside this forum = no link to this forum.
-
I'm not taking pee. There's a sticky on the board which was a discussion on the 3 strikes policy. A good debate which all good forums need. You don't move on if you reflect your own views all the time. I think that this would be another good debate, after all, what's the big deal in sponsoring the forums favourite player if you can raise the funds?
We have had this discussion in the past, a number of times and it's been decided not to do it.
If people from here want to get together and sponsor a player then that's fine.
But it wont it happen under the the banner of OER. It has to fall outside this forum = no link to this forum.
Why? I just don't get the logic why you wouldn't. In fact, in years to come it could become a highly sought after endorsement to the playing list. They could also be the main feature on our banner - jeez this thing writes itself lads.
-
We should at least be able to talk about it.
-
Prestia 3
Batch 41 -
Markov 14 +
-
Prestia 2
Batch 42
Markov 14
:clapping
-
We should at least be able to talk about it.
And get more than "No it's not happening"
-
Prestia 3
Batch 42
Markov 13
-
We should at least be able to talk about it.
And get more than "No it's not happening"
It can happen but not under the OER banner. I thought that was pretty clear.
I think you all forget that we have no ownership of this site. We do not contribute to its running costs and thus are just forum members. WP and OE run the show. If they say no, it means no. It does not mean we can discuss it or take a vote. There is nothing stopping any of you getting together, gathering the cash and sponsoring Jake or any other player. You can even do it through tigermosh if you wish. I am sure Coach wouldn't mind. ;D
-
We should at least be able to talk about it.
And get more than "No it's not happening"
It can happen but not under the OER banner. I thought that was pretty clear.
::) yeah mate that makes it blatantly clear why it can not happen ::).
-
Prestia 2
Batch 43
Markov 13
-
We should at least be able to talk about it.
And get more than "No it's not happening"
It can happen but not under the OER banner. I thought that was pretty clear.
I think you all forget that we have no ownership of this site. We do not contribute to its running costs and thus are just forum members. WP and OE run the show. If they say no, it means no. It does not mean we can discuss it or take a vote.
Actually, unless this is Nazi germany, as long as we are not breaking forum rules, we can discuss just about anything.
-
We should at least be able to talk about it.
And get more than "No it's not happening"
It can happen but not under the OER banner. I thought that was pretty clear.
I think you all forget that we have no ownership of this site. We do not contribute to its running costs and thus are just forum members. WP and OE run the show. If they say no, it means no. It does not mean we can discuss it or take a vote.
Actually, unless this is Nazi germany, as long as we are not breaking forum rules, we can discuss just about anything.
Sorry, I meant you can discuss it but it won't change anything.
No means no, unless the bosses change their minds! ;D
-
We should at least be able to talk about it.
And get more than "No it's not happening"
It can happen but not under the OER banner. I thought that was pretty clear.
I think you all forget that we have no ownership of this site. We do not contribute to its running costs and thus are just forum members. WP and OE run the show. If they say no, it means no. It does not mean we can discuss it or take a vote.
Actually, unless this is Nazi germany, as long as we are not breaking forum rules, we can discuss just about anything.
Sorry, I meant you can discuss it but it won't change anything.
No means no, unless the bosses change their minds! ;D
Discuss it away to your hearts content
Organise it yourselves; go for it it
But it won't be OER sponsoring a player.
But can I make it any clearer?
::) yeah mate that makes it blatantly clear why it can not happen ::).
I have explained why it won't happen. There have been many discussions over many years (this site has been running for 13 years) and it has been decided everytime we won't be doing it.
It won't be changing
I get people don't like it, agree with it but it is they way it is
I would think Doc YBB has explained it exceptionally well
-
Prestia 1-
Batch 44+
Markov 13
-
We should at least be able to talk about it.
And get more than "No it's not happening"
It can happen but not under the OER banner. I thought that was pretty clear.
I think you all forget that we have no ownership of this site. We do not contribute to its running costs and thus are just forum members. WP and OE run the show. If they say no, it means no. It does not mean we can discuss it or take a vote.
Actually, unless this is Nazi germany, as long as we are not breaking forum rules, we can discuss just about anything.
Sorry, I meant you can discuss it but it won't change anything.
No means no, unless the bosses change their minds! ;D
Discuss it away to your hearts content
Organise it yourselves; go for it it
But it won't be OER sponsoring a player.
But can I make it any clearer?
::) yeah mate that makes it blatantly clear why it can not happen ::).
I have explained why it won't happen. There have been many discussions over many years (this site has been running for 13 years) and it has been decided everytime we won't be doing it.
It won't be changing
I get people don't like it, agree with it but it is they way it is
I would think Doc YBB has explained it exceptionally well
I'd say the good doc has just shown to be falling in line - you still haven't clearly explained why the hell this forum doesn't sponsor players.
That ain't clear big Willy so stop with the cute Peggy talk and explain that nice and slowly, in English and why the reason plenty of years ago is still relevant today - its an ever changing world and time you caught up with that sunshine ;D
-
you still haven't clearly explained why the hell this forum doesn't sponsor players.
That ain't clear big Willy so stop with the cute Peggy talk and explain that nice and slowly, in English and why the reason plenty of years ago is still relevant today - its an ever changing world and time you caught up with that sunshine ;D
I'll ask you a couple of question first
Why do you think we should now?
Because other sites do it?
Are you prepared to put it all together or do just think it should be another thing the mods should
do?
You going to cover any shortfall in $$
And in answer to your questions
We've never done it. And the reasons why are as relevant today as they have been every other time it's been discussed.
-
I have explained why it won't happen. There have been many discussions over many years (this site has been running for 13 years) and it has been decided everytime we won't be doing it.
That explains how the decision came about but what were the major reasons WHY it should not/will not happen. Even in your most recent post where HRT questions the reasoning your only response is "the reasons why are as relevant today as they have been every other time"
I would think Doc YBB has explained it exceptionally well
All he has done is muddy the water with his opinion. Fair enough if you want to avoid the question for whatever reason but the white knight doesn't need to try and dismiss everyones questions and opinions based on the fact "if you say no, it means no". Maybe he should let the people who can actually answer the questions answer the question
-
I have explained why it won't happen. There have been many discussions over many years (this site has been running for 13 years) and it has been decided everytime we won't be doing it.
That explains how the decision came about but what were the major reasons WHY it should not/will not happen. Even in your most recent post where HRT questions the reasoning your only response is "the reasons why are as relevant today as they have been every other time"
I would think Doc YBB has explained it exceptionally well
All he has done is muddy the water with his opinion. Fair enough if you want to avoid the question for whatever reason but the white knight doesn't need to try and dismiss everyones questions and opinions based on the fact "if you say no, it means no". Maybe he should let the people who can actually answer the questions answer the question
White knight? LMAO.
It only requires a tiny amount of intelligence to work out the reasons why OER doesn't offer player sponsorships.
OER is a website that is run by a small number of people. They devote their personal time for free to keep the site afloat. They don't make money like others from advertising etc. When it comes to player sponsorship, the time and money required to do this properly, chase up people for money and even maybe put in their own hard earned to make up shortfalls, make it less than desirable.
Does that make sense now?
Sheesh, talk about having to spell out the bloody obvious. :banghead
-
I have explained why it won't happen. There have been many discussions over many years (this site has been running for 13 years) and it has been decided everytime we won't be doing it.
That explains how the decision came about but what were the major reasons WHY it should not/will not happen. Even in your most recent post where HRT questions the reasoning your only response is "the reasons why are as relevant today as they have been every other time"
I would think Doc YBB has explained it exceptionally well
All he has done is muddy the water with his opinion. Fair enough if you want to avoid the question for whatever reason but the white knight doesn't need to try and dismiss everyones questions and opinions based on the fact "if you say no, it means no". Maybe he should let the people who can actually answer the questions answer the question
White knight? LMAO.
It only requires a tiny amount of intelligence to work out the reasons why OER doesn't offer player sponsorships.
OER is a website that is run by a small number of people. They devote their personal time for free to keep the site afloat. They don't make money like others from advertising etc. When it comes to player sponsorship, the time and money required to do this properly, chase up people for money and even maybe put in their own hard earned to make up shortfalls, make it less than desirable.
Does that make sense now?
Sheesh, talk about having to spell out the bloody obvious. :banghead
You my friend are one of the few people on this forum with a shred of intelligence it seems from my narrow view of things.
-
Prestia 0
Batch 45+
Markov 13
-
Sheesh,
I would have thought it was simple.
It's $1000 to sponsor a player.
20x$50.
If 20 people put in $50, some might put in multiple shares, then there is enough to do it.
If there wasn't enough then money returned and doesn't go ahead.
Who said anything about the site mods having to cover shortfalls.
In saying that, I don't give a continental and wouldn't be putting in.
-
Sheesh,
I would have thought it was simple.
It's $1000 to sponsor a player.
20x$50.
If 20 people put in $50, some might put in multiple shares, then there is enough to do it.
If there wasn't enough then money returned and doesn't go ahead.
Who said anything about the site mods having to cover shortfalls.
In saying that, I don't give a continental and wouldn't be putting in.
Mate, it is obvious this Yellowblood guy is trying to get himself a gig on the mod team.
'Shortfall' is not a genuine excuse.
-
Sheesh,
I would have thought it was simple.
It's $1000 to sponsor a player.
20x$50.
If 20 people put in $50, some might put in multiple shares, then there is enough to do it.
If there wasn't enough then money returned and doesn't go ahead.
Who said anything about the site mods having to cover shortfalls.
In saying that, I don't give a continental and wouldn't be putting in.
Not even Batch? ;D
I'd just ask we have a vote like the 3 strikes thread which you can still view as a sticky for context. Then leave it up once it's been voted on and let people decide once and for all. If it's been debated several times, then it's obviously one of those things that has some profile so why not sticky a discussion thread and vote?
-
Sheesh,
I would have thought it was simple.
It's $1000 to sponsor a player.
20x$50.
If 20 people put in $50, some might put in multiple shares, then there is enough to do it.
If there wasn't enough then money returned and doesn't go ahead.
Who said anything about the site mods having to cover shortfalls.
In saying that, I don't give a continental and wouldn't be putting in.
Mate, it is obvious this Yellowblood guy is trying to get himself a gig on the mod team.
'Shortfall' is not a genuine excuse.
It may be "obvious" to fools because your statement is completely false. 100% BS.
-
This isnt my vote post but clearly theres an issue with the votes not totalling 60 (and alot of confusion in the last few pages).
Batch 45
Markov 13
Should we just give an extra vote to each?
-
I have explained why it won't happen. There have been many discussions over many years (this site has been running for 13 years) and it has been decided everytime we won't be doing it.
That explains how the decision came about but what were the major reasons WHY it should not/will not happen. Even in your most recent post where HRT questions the reasoning your only response is "the reasons why are as relevant today as they have been every other time"
I would think Doc YBB has explained it exceptionally well
All he has done is muddy the water with his opinion. Fair enough if you want to avoid the question for whatever reason but the white knight doesn't need to try and dismiss everyones questions and opinions based on the fact "if you say no, it means no". Maybe he should let the people who can actually answer the questions answer the question
White knight? LMAO.
It only requires a tiny amount of intelligence to work out the reasons why OER doesn't offer player sponsorships.
OER is a website that is run by a small number of people. They devote their personal time for free to keep the site afloat. They don't make money like others from advertising etc. When it comes to player sponsorship, the time and money required to do this properly, chase up people for money and even maybe put in their own hard earned to make up shortfalls, make it less than desirable.
Does that make sense now?
Sheesh, talk about having to spell out the bloody obvious. :banghead
I'm not an idiot, I can make my own assumptions too. The thing you're forgetting is we are asking the MODS what their reasons for it are, not your self appointed mod opinion, which btw Damo has rebutted. Not yours, theirs. Does THAT make any sense now?
We. Are. Not. Asking. Your. Opinion. Now hopefully with it spelled out you'll understand ::) ::)
-
This isnt my vote post but clearly theres an issue with the votes not totalling 60 (and alot of confusion in the last few pages).
Batch 45
Markov 13
Should we just give an extra vote to each?
I think it would be best as such I make the scores as
Batch 46
Markov 14
-
24 hrs
Batch 47
Markov 13
-
I'd just ask we have a vote like the 3 strikes thread which you can still view as a sticky for context. Then leave it up once it's been voted on and let people decide once and for all. If it's been debated several times, then it's obviously one of those things that has some profile so why not sticky a discussion thread and vote?
I am not sure why you think that it is up to posters to decide if the site is to sponsor players
There will be no vote as we (the mods, the people who run and fund the site) have decided previously (after numerous discussions and stuff) not to do it.
I get that people don't like it but ultimately it is the site owners who have the final say as we are the ones who deal with all the outside stuff you good stuff don't have to worry about. Think that gives us a final say on a number of things and this is one of them
So I don't think we are being unreasonable in deciding it's not something this site will do. It has always been our view is and has been every time it's been bought up that we will not go down that path. We have not changed on our mind on it. that other sites do it is not relevant to OER. We have said from day 1 we don't care what other sites do.
Simply it is not something we have the time, the resources to do. Throw in what else it involves regarding dealing with people's money and other private stuff (eg bank accounts) then it is huge job, one as I said we are not going to undertake
People have ridiculed YBB for their comments (view / opinion) but it was more succinctly put than anything I had time to post.
I will say explain this just once.
I asked 4 questions of which one was singled out and no one bothered to answer any of the others.
Re the one singled out: the cost and the possible shortfall. It costs $1500 to sponsor a player @ $50 each it requires 30 people. I asked simply question what happens if there is $50-$100 shortfall, who's going to cover it? it wasn't an excuse it was a question. These are the things that need to be considered and sorted out in this sort of thing...
the logistics involved in pulling this all together isn't as simple as people seem to think.
I will repeat again
If people from here want to band together to sponsor a player then by all means go ahead
But it will not fall under the banner of OER as the site position is simple: we have chosen that we don't and won't be sponsoring players
-
Markov 14
Batchelor 46
-
Big Willy, I was hoping you might answer my questions first ;D
Out of interest, by answering the other 3 questions and providing answers/solutions - would that change your view?
Because it isn't seeming that way which is the other reason I'm not going to answer them just yet ;)
-
$1000 for a coterie member, which I would assume someone involved is.
-
$1000 for a coterie member, which I would assume someone involved is.
Yes there are coterie members on the forum (I'm one) but a coterie member could not take out a sponsorship under their membership in the na,e of someone or something else
So it is $1500
-
Big Willy, I was hoping you might answer my questions first ;D
Out of interest, by answering the other 3 questions and providing answers/solutions - would that change your view?
Because it isn't seeming that way which is the other reason I'm not going to answer them just yet ;)
I think I've answered - see below
But it will not fall under the banner of OER as the site position is simple: we have chosen that we don't and won't be sponsoring players
-
Big Willy, I was hoping you might answer my questions first ;D
Out of interest, by answering the other 3 questions and providing answers/solutions - would that change your view?
Because it isn't seeming that way which is the other reason I'm not going to answer them just yet ;)
I think I've answered - see below
But it will not fall under the banner of OER as the site position is simple: we have chosen that we don't and won't be sponsoring players
Good, so don't ask me questions if you're not going to take my views on board and/or change your position to the topic.
-
Markov 13
Batchelor 47
-
Markov 14
Batch 46
-
Markov 14-
#spiritualoersponsoredplayer47+
-
Markov 14-
#spiritualoersponsoredplayer47+
Mrakkas should be 13
-
Markov 12- (amended for HRT forgetting to subtract)
#spiritualoersponsoredplayer48+
-
Mrarkorv 11
The great one 49 :clapping
-
Markov 12
Batchelor 48
-
Markov 11
Batchelor 49
-
Whats say we make tomorrow worth double points?
-
Good, so don't ask me questions if you're not going to take my views on board and/or change your position to the topic.
You wanted a discussion / debate
You appeared to be wanting to push the agenda
I wanted to know why you had the sudden interest in this. Wanted to try understand your obsession (for want a better term) with it.
Also was trying to understand why you had the view that it should be decided by posters and why you thought it should be left up to the posters.
Was interested in your views rather than you just pushing your "demands" (again for want of a better term).
-
Markov 12
Batchelor 48
-
Good, so don't ask me questions if you're not going to take my views on board and/or change your position to the topic.
You wanted a discussion / debate
You appeared to be wanting to push the agenda
I wanted to know why you had the sudden interest in this. Wanted to try understand your obsession (for want a better term) with it.
Also was trying to understand why you had the view that it should be decided by posters and why you thought it should be left up to the posters.
Was interested in your views rather than you just pushing your "demands" (again for want of a better term).
Sudden interest = overwhelming batch love
Demands = perhaps you being hyper sensitive to a fair challenge
My simple view is that anything should be considered if the will of the overall forum requests it. Resource, money etc take care of themselves if the desire is there - you should be comfortable with the way the resource is administered and the way money is collected/raised but that isn't beyond your scope of skill sets.If the will isn't there, then everyone plays on
-
Can I ask why you wouldn't let the name OER go next to the player, whether you had any sort of contribution or not? I can understand protecting your image and your property but I don't understand how it can be construed in a negative way
-
Members come and go on this site. I love how people think it's so easy to collect money from 20 people on a consistent basis - especially people that wish to remain anonymous.
Why the wish to do it under the OER name anyway? If the sites owners don't want to, I can't see why they have to justify every piece of their reasoning.
Can't people do it under their own banner? If you know it is easy to gather 20 people from this site, just PM them and do it. You can do it under the Tigermosh banner if Coach & co. allow it. From a personal point of view, I already spend a lot of money on the club through a high level coterie membership. I don't want to spend any more.
Finally, can any of you remember when your parents gave the reasoning you can't do something "because I said so!"? This is a similar case! ;D
-
Members come and go on this site. I love how people think it's so easy to collect money from 20 people on a consistent basis - especially people that wish to remain anonymous.
Why the wish to do it under the OER name anyway? If the sites owners don't want to, I can't see why they have to justify every piece of their reasoning.
Can't people do it under their own banner? If you know it is easy to gather 20 people from this site, just PM them and do it. You can do it under the Tigermosh banner if Coach & co. allow it. From a personal point of view, I already spend a lot of money on the club through a high level coterie membership. I don't want to spend any more.
Finally, can any of you remember when your parents gave the reasoning you can't do something "because I said so!"? This is a similar case! ;D
Good parents allow the debate but I didn't think we were kids anyway. As for raising money, who said it was easy? You're making a lot of incorrect assumptions but the one thing I do agree is that for no good reason we won't sponsor a player.
-
Markov 11-
Batch 49+
-
Markov 10-
Batch 50+
-
Molotov 11
Batch 49
-
Markov 12
Batchelor 48
-
Sudden interest = overwhelming batch love
Fair enough
Demands = perhaps you being hyper sensitive to a fair challenge
definitely not
My simple view is that anything should be considered if the will of the overall forum requests it.
this is where we are miles apart. You seem to believe that every decision on how this site is/should be run or what it should do or not do somehow should be determined by the posters.
Not sure why that is to be honest with.
But that is not the way it is or ever has been.
As the owners of this site we have to and do make decisions, we make rules, administer them and we get that people don't like some of the things we've done.
We have had to deal with outside issues caused by the actions of people posting on this site. The people that cause the issues don't have to deal with these things. We (owners/mods) do; it is our responsibility and we take it seriously. I know people laugh and ridicule when I say it but we've had to do it.
Everything we do is with one constant in mind and that is we do what is best for the site, to protect it and keep it up and running. So we make calls independent of posters because we have to and simply we have the right too.
This is one of instances. We have made a call, we're comfortable with it and have no intention of changing it. People don't like it; I get that but it is the decision we've made. Not sure why folks won't accept it.
Resource, money etc take care of themselves if the desire is there - you should be comfortable with the way the resource is administered and the way money is collected/raised but that isn't beyond your scope of skill sets.If the will isn't there, then everyone plays on
Not sure what you mean here re the underlined bit
Can I ask why you wouldn't let the name OER go next to the player, whether you had any sort of contribution or not? I can understand protecting your image and your property but I don't understand how it can be construed in a negative way
Think I've covered part of this above
You've also answered the question in your question when you said "protecting your image and your property".
But in blunt terms, we are the owners of this site and we are not willing to give our permission for the site's name to be used so it cannot be used. It has nothing to whether we contribute or not. We are not sanctioning it as part of this site; that's the call we've made.
-
Markov 11
Batchelor 49
(https://kornsarcade.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/finish-him-header.gif)
-
Markov 10
Batchelor 50
-
Markov 11
Batchelor 49
-
Markov 10
Batchelor 50
-
Markov 9-
Batchelor 51+
-
10
50
-
Batchelor 51
Mrarkov 9
:clapping
-
Batchelor 52
Mrarkov 8
-
Markov 9
Batchelor 51
-
Sudden interest = overwhelming batch love
Fair enough
Demands = perhaps you being hyper sensitive to a fair challenge
definitely not
My simple view is that anything should be considered if the will of the overall forum requests it.
this is where we are miles apart. You seem to believe that every decision on how this site is/should be run or what it should do or not do somehow should be determined by the posters.
Not sure why that is to be honest with.
But that is not the way it is or ever has been.
As the owners of this site we have to and do make decisions, we make rules, administer them and we get that people don't like some of the things we've done.
We have had to deal with outside issues caused by the actions of people posting on this site. The people that cause the issues don't have to deal with these things. We (owners/mods) do; it is our responsibility and we take it seriously. I know people laugh and ridicule when I say it but we've had to do it.
Everything we do is with one constant in mind and that is we do what is best for the site, to protect it and keep it up and running. So we make calls independent of posters because we have to and simply we have the right too.
This is one of instances. We have made a call, we're comfortable with it and have no intention of changing it. People don't like it; I get that but it is the decision we've made. Not sure why folks won't accept it.
Resource, money etc take care of themselves if the desire is there - you should be comfortable with the way the resource is administered and the way money is collected/raised but that isn't beyond your scope of skill sets.If the will isn't there, then everyone plays on
Not sure what you mean here
But in blunt terms, we are the owners of this site and we are not willing to give our permission for the site's name to be used so it cannot be used. It has nothing to whether we contribute or not. We are not sanctioning it as part of this site; that's the call we've made.
Couple of things here and then I'll shut up.
I do think good forums evolve and site operators/owners evolve with it. Knowing when and why to evolve is a decision for the site owners but I think forum members can sometimes play a meaningful role here.
I don't agree with your assumption that I think every decision should be the domain of forum members. Apart from one post, over many years and thousands of posts, I'm pretty sure the evidence is there that I support almost all of your decisions. Particularly ones which have legal implications. I'd challenge you to find otherwise which is why I think you're being overly sensitive in this particular issue.
Having done this before, it is easy enough to do but time consuming to execute.
If done well, player sponsorship has no impact on the overall forum -particularly if members of the forum support it. It certainly has no legal risk.
Having said all of that, it's your choice which is fair.
It's not a matter of whether people are accepting of that decision, it's the way you haven't even bothered to explain the background or reason for that decision.
Again, your call but your not naive enough to think members of this forum will just sit back and say "oh that's okay because big willy says so?"
Your going to get challenged (you call it demands) so all I'd say is be open to the challenge (not demands, there were never any demands but suggestions and challenges and perhaps ask that question for clarity)but if you feel strongly to say the decisions final and we aren't going to explain it because we couldn't be bothered then just bloody post that!
Don't ask questions if your not going to change your mind!!'
-
Spot on HRT :clapping
The issue I feel is we as forum members are getting the RFC member treatment with WP and OE (who has been surprisingly quiet) playing the part of RFC officials. Funny WP is the most vocal about that being an issue
P.S I understand the difference between us as forum members and a RFC member
Can I ask why you wouldn't let the name OER go next to the player, whether you had any sort of contribution or not? I can understand protecting your image and your property but I don't understand how it can be construed in a negative way
Think I've covered part of this above
You've also answered the question in your question when you said "protecting your image and your property".
But in blunt terms, we are the owners of this site and we are not willing to give our permission for the site's name to be used so it cannot be used. It has nothing to whether we contribute or not. We are not sanctioning it as part of this site; that's the call we've made.
Doesn't really answer the underlined
-
Markov 8
Batchelor 52
-
Markov 9
Batchelor 51
-
Markov 10
Batchelor 52
-
Couple of things here and then I'll shut up.
Nothing more form me
I am just shutting up ;D
-
Couple of things here and then I'll shut up.
Nothing more form me
I am just shutting up ;D
:cheers
Jonny Markov 9-
Jake the Legend plenty+
-
Including correction of WP's post
Markov 8
Batchelor 52
-
Markov 7
Batchelor 53
-
Batchelor 54
Mrarkov 6
:clapping
-
53
7
-
53
7
:huh3
Damo - stop delaying the inevitable.
And that goes for the rest of you buffoons. Capicsi?
-
Markov 8
Batchelor 52
-
Markov 7-
Man Love 51+
-
Corrected
Markov 7
Man Love 53
-
52 Batch
8 Oleg
-
53
7
-
54 Smashelor
6 Mark off
Lets get this done :clapping
-
55 batch
5 Mrrrakorrrrv
-
Batch 54
Markov 6
-
Markov 7
Batchelor 53
-
Markovy Mark and the funky bunch 6-
Batchelor 54+
-
Markov 5
Batchelor 55
-
Markov 4
Batchelor 56
When should we start the showboating gifs?
-
What the hell...the night is young
(http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/136/files/2013/10/EouJhBR.gif)
-
Yeah at least try and steer clear of seppo crap...
-
Yeah at least try and steer clear of seppo crap...
Ok hows this?
(https://media.giphy.com/media/tLQfm7dmGqxfa/giphy.gif)
-
(http://worldsoccertalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/miguel-herrera-celebration-cinco.gif)
-
Markov 3
Batchelor 57
-
(http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/jsc.gif)
-
Markov 4
Batchelor 56
[
-
Markov 5
Batchelor 55
-
Markov 4
Batchelor 56
-
Markov 5
Batch 55
-
Markov 4-
Batch 56+
-
5
55
-
4
56
-
Markov 5
Batchelor 55
-
6
54
-
Mrarkrorv 5
Batchelor 55
-
Markov 4
Batchelor 56
-
Markov 3-
Batchelor 57+
-
Markov 2-
Batchelor 58+
-
Markov 3
Batchelor 57
:help
-
Markov 2
Batchelor 58
Wheres your god now?
-
Markov 2
Batchelor 58
Wheres your god now?
Lol! Do you really think God would worry about a little game on a forum....
LMAO
-
Do you really think that was a literal comment?
-
Do you really think that was a literal comment?
Who knows with the Dookster!
-
Markov 1
Batchelor 59
-
Markov 1
Batchelor 59
Penelope can end this right now. :pray
Only Damo or the mods can spoil the result.
-
Markov 2
Batch 58
;D
-
Markov 2
Batch 58
;D
HRT and Penelope to end this.
Then we bow down to our saviour
(https://footy-prophet.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2016/10/Jake-Batchelor-2.jpg)
-
Markov 2
Batch 58
;D
HRT and Penelope to end this.
Then we bow down to our saviour
(https://footy-prophet.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2016/10/Jake-Batchelor-2.jpg)
Not with that charcoal and mustard BLK training top he won't be!
-
Markov 3
Batch 57
;D
:dancing :pillowfight :razz
-
Markov 2
Batch 58
-
Markov 3
Batchelor 57
-
Markov 2
Batchelor 58
-
Markov 2
Batchelor 58
Chuck, HRT and Dio to post. Could be it very soon
-
Markov 1
Batchelor 59
-
Markov 0
Batchelor 60
(http://cache4.asset-cache.net/xr/143949227.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=3&d=77BFBA49EF8789215AB089EE596C658857D85F6875097D49A478C087C9E049C519F4E102A0C909A2E30A760B0D811297)
(http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/epicrapbattlesofhistory/images/0/07/Game_over.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20141212000305)
-
(https://media.makeameme.org/created/dmh4ai.jpg)
-
Now for OER to make him the inaugural designated sponsored player for the forum ;D
-
Well done Jake :clapping
It is now time to put our differences aside and back in the Jman
-
Now for OER to make him the inaugural designated sponsored player for the forum ;D
:nope :scared :neener
;D
-
Well done Jake :clapping
It is now time to put our differences aside and back in the Jman
Lets do this
-
Such a rewarding victor for this prestigious award