Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Quote from: tigersalive on April 19, 2010, 10:25:06 PMQuote from: Bentleigh-esque on April 19, 2010, 07:18:29 PMQuote from: mat073 on April 19, 2010, 05:14:47 PMFact 1.... The Richmond team contained 5 players who had played 4 games or less.Fact 2... There were 9 players who had played less than 20 gamesFact 3...There were 12 players who had played less than 30 games---Im no Einstein,but I think thats half the team.You cant lose when you play youth.Melbourne had Watts & Morton to come into the side ...You mean Melbourne have Morton to come into the side?Watts doesn't count because it's Melbourne's choice not to play him so he's clearly not in their best 22.Gee, the Dees would want to hope Watts comes in and makes a real impact over the next few years. If not lets see if they cop as much crap for not selecting Natanui as we did with Buddy. Imagine how goods the Dees would be or even could be now with big Nick in their side....... scary.
Quote from: Bentleigh-esque on April 19, 2010, 07:18:29 PMQuote from: mat073 on April 19, 2010, 05:14:47 PMFact 1.... The Richmond team contained 5 players who had played 4 games or less.Fact 2... There were 9 players who had played less than 20 gamesFact 3...There were 12 players who had played less than 30 games---Im no Einstein,but I think thats half the team.You cant lose when you play youth.Melbourne had Watts & Morton to come into the side ...You mean Melbourne have Morton to come into the side?Watts doesn't count because it's Melbourne's choice not to play him so he's clearly not in their best 22.
Quote from: mat073 on April 19, 2010, 05:14:47 PMFact 1.... The Richmond team contained 5 players who had played 4 games or less.Fact 2... There were 9 players who had played less than 20 gamesFact 3...There were 12 players who had played less than 30 games---Im no Einstein,but I think thats half the team.You cant lose when you play youth.Melbourne had Watts & Morton to come into the side ...
Fact 1.... The Richmond team contained 5 players who had played 4 games or less.Fact 2... There were 9 players who had played less than 20 gamesFact 3...There were 12 players who had played less than 30 games---Im no Einstein,but I think thats half the team.You cant lose when you play youth.
Quote from: WA Tiger on April 19, 2010, 10:34:39 PMQuote from: tigersalive on April 19, 2010, 10:25:06 PMQuote from: Bentleigh-esque on April 19, 2010, 07:18:29 PMQuote from: mat073 on April 19, 2010, 05:14:47 PMFact 1.... The Richmond team contained 5 players who had played 4 games or less.Fact 2... There were 9 players who had played less than 20 gamesFact 3...There were 12 players who had played less than 30 games---Im no Einstein,but I think thats half the team.You cant lose when you play youth.Melbourne had Watts & Morton to come into the side ...You mean Melbourne have Morton to come into the side?Watts doesn't count because it's Melbourne's choice not to play him so he's clearly not in their best 22.Gee, the Dees would want to hope Watts comes in and makes a real impact over the next few years. If not lets see if they cop as much crap for not selecting Natanui as we did with Buddy. Imagine how goods the Dees would be or even could be now with big Nick in their side....... scary.Or by the same token would NicNat have been molly-coddled by the Dees like Jack Watts has?
