Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck

[Rampstar]

Anyone reckon we should consider taking say Travis Tuck at 50 and Todd Banfield with our last pick. Banfield just got delisted by Lions and they will try and rookie him. Considering we lost White I think Banfield with our last pick may not be a bad option. He knows how to kick a goal. Travis Tuck can come in and play the role his brother did, the hard in and under player. At late picks I think we should consider.

[Loui Tufga]

No to Tuck on the primary list, Rookie yes. Banfield is defiantly worth the risk at 60. I'm not sure what's behind Brisbane cutting him?

[gerkin greg]

Banfield is worse than Nahas FFS

[dwaino]

Wouldn't get in a poo fight with other clubs trying to win Banfield, but wouldn't mind him for chips. More warm bodies to compete for the 21-25 spots the better imo.

[Rampstar]

Banfield is worse than Nahas FFS

disagree and think that bringing him in as the last player on the list is a risk worth taking. we aint gonna get nobody anyway at pick 68 anyway.

[tony_montana]

Ive got a doozy in mind 

[tigs2011]

Banfield is worse than Nahas FFS

disagree and think that bringing him in as the last player on the list is a risk worth taking. we aint gonna get nobody anyway at pick 68 anyway.

Yeah but getting Banfield and Tuck would make certainties of it. 

[Rampstar]

If you could get 5 to 8 games a season from both then its been a win.

[gerkin greg]

Nahas >>> Banfield

you're taking the list backwards Terry

[Rampstar]

Nahas >>> Banfield

you're taking the list backwards Terry

dont call me Terry just call me the List Manager 

[MADTIGER2010]

Banfield would be a good get. Late pick or psd. Has excitement factor but can be sloppy or lazy. A new club could change him

[tigs2011]

Nahas >>> Banfield

you're taking the list backwards Terry

dont call me Terry just call me the List Manager 

[FooffooValve]

Would take Kane Lambert over both of these.

[tiga]

Ive got a doozy in mind 

Well spill the beans Tone!