Author Topic: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck  (Read 1141 times)

Rampstar

  • Guest
Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« on: November 14, 2013, 08:37:23 PM »
Anyone reckon we should consider taking say Travis Tuck at 50 and Todd Banfield with our last pick. Banfield just got delisted by Lions and they will try and rookie him. Considering we lost White I think Banfield with our last pick may not be a bad option. He knows how to kick a goal. Travis Tuck can come in and play the role his brother did, the hard in and under player. At late picks I think we should consider.

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2013, 08:58:24 PM »
No to Tuck on the primary list, Rookie yes. Banfield is defiantly worth the risk at 60. I'm not sure what's behind Brisbane cutting him?

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2013, 09:02:22 PM »
Banfield is worse than Nahas FFS

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2013, 09:25:21 PM »
Wouldn't get in a poo fight with other clubs trying to win Banfield, but wouldn't mind him for chips. More warm bodies to compete for the 21-25 spots the better imo.

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2013, 11:16:58 PM »
Banfield is worse than Nahas FFS

disagree and think that bringing him in as the last player on the list is a risk worth taking. we aint gonna get nobody anyway at pick 68 anyway.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2013, 11:26:46 PM »
Ive got a doozy in mind  :shh

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2013, 02:27:03 AM »
Banfield is worse than Nahas FFS

disagree and think that bringing him in as the last player on the list is a risk worth taking. we aint gonna get nobody anyway at pick 68 anyway.
Yeah but getting Banfield and Tuck would make certainties of it.  ;D

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« Reply #7 on: November 15, 2013, 09:13:52 AM »
If you could get 5 to 8 games a season from both then its been a win.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« Reply #8 on: November 15, 2013, 09:51:19 AM »
Nahas >>> Banfield

you're taking the list backwards Terry

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« Reply #9 on: November 15, 2013, 10:18:14 AM »
Nahas >>> Banfield

you're taking the list backwards Terry

dont call me Terry just call me the List Manager  ;D

Offline MADTIGER2010

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« Reply #10 on: November 15, 2013, 10:41:14 AM »
Banfield would be a good get. Late pick or psd. Has excitement factor but can be sloppy or lazy. A new club could change him

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« Reply #11 on: November 15, 2013, 10:59:47 AM »
Nahas >>> Banfield

you're taking the list backwards Terry

dont call me Terry just call me the List Manager  ;D
:lol

FooffooValve

  • Guest
Re: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« Reply #12 on: November 15, 2013, 11:06:01 AM »
Would take Kane Lambert over both of these.

Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: Todd Banfield and Travis Tuck
« Reply #13 on: November 15, 2013, 11:08:41 AM »
Ive got a doozy in mind  :shh

Well spill the beans Tone!