Author Topic: Under this model the premiers wouldn’t have got Tom Lynch: King (Fox)  (Read 2431 times)

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Under this model the premiers wouldn’t have got Tom Lynch: King (Fox)
« Reply #15 on: October 09, 2019, 01:56:34 PM »
Free agency was not introduce because the AFL wanted it. It was introduced because the players wanted more freedom and the AFL agreed as it help ward off any legal action by players in restraint of trade.

The very fact that free agency has worked for player Tom Lynch shows it is a roaring success
And as much as people want to whinge, if a premiership contender had $1 mill of cap space available (or around 6-7%) then they should be perfectly entitled to bring players in. All credit should go to a team that has that much space available AND is in a position to contend for a flag. Otherwise its just punishment for being a successful team.

Players move for three reasons IMO.

 - Chance at a flag
 - $$
 - To be closer to home/family/friends

Tom's move was linked strongly to two of those three.

At the end of the day, FA is still tied to TPP which IS an equalisation measure.

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9983
Re: Under this model the premiers wouldn’t have got Tom Lynch: King (Fox)
« Reply #16 on: October 12, 2019, 08:57:28 AM »
This article is such a joke.

It should be titled 'how we could have F'd Richmond over' instead.

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Under this model the premiers wouldn’t have got Tom Lynch: King (Fox)
« Reply #17 on: October 12, 2019, 09:13:34 AM »
Ahh well Kingy, we weren't the premiers when we got Lynch anyway so don't sweat your sack over it.
Lots of people name their swords......