Author Topic: Rate a Tiger's year - Maurice Rioli Jnr  (Read 1621 times)

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 39312
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - Maurice Rioli Jnr
« Reply #15 on: September 11, 2023, 09:08:21 PM »
a zero for me for looking fat and lazy during games. It would have been a 1, but then his petulant antics refusing to answer the call brought it down to zero.

one more year then its a rookie spot from 2025.

Can’t say fat Frankie

Been established in the AFLW thread we should say overweight

Oh hang on .. this is the male side .. fat is fine here

Clearly a whack at me Damo, which is fine

And no, fat isn't fine in either
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4044
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - Maurice Rioli Jnr
« Reply #16 on: September 12, 2023, 12:09:41 AM »
a zero for me for looking fat and lazy during games. It would have been a 1, but then his petulant antics refusing to answer the call brought it down to zero.

one more year then its a rookie spot from 2025.

Can’t say fat Frankie

Been established in the AFLW thread we should say overweight

Oh hang on .. this is the male side .. fat is fine here

Clearly a whack at me Damo, which is fine

And no, fat isn't fine in either

It’s a whack at PC Australia

Only in such a ridiculous world could the word fat be offensive and overweight be acceptable

The world as we knew it is fried

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13695
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - Maurice Rioli Jnr
« Reply #17 on: September 12, 2023, 06:20:45 AM »
Hahaha damo spot on. They will survive the vulgar word though  :lol

Fat is totally acceptable and will continue to be used.. Bradtke Rioli tippa all look fat to
me and not fit.





Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7329
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - Maurice Rioli Jnr
« Reply #18 on: September 12, 2023, 09:17:58 PM »
lard arse

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 96258
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - Maurice Rioli Jnr
« Reply #19 on: September 13, 2023, 03:08:23 PM »
NEXT YEAR MASSIVE FOR RIOLI

Richmond small forward Maurice Rioli has committed to completing a massive off-season of training to give himself the best chance of playing regular football after a below par third season.

Rioli kicked 14.7 last year in his second season in 15 matches but regressed this year with 2.5 from 10 games and was often used as starting substitute or subbed out mid-game.

He notably refused to answer the phone to assistant coach Xavier Clarke before accepting when subbed off against West Coast.

Both times he has returned from his off-season breaks having to play catch-up but has committed to a better off-season break as he works on a fitness regime.

Rioli is committed to the Tigers until the end of next year, so needs to make every post a winner.

https://www.codesports.com.au/afl/moneyball-the-latest-contract-updates-and-trade-news-in-the-afl/news-story/1909099736fd49d29520874e638bc573

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7689
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - Maurice Rioli Jnr
« Reply #20 on: September 13, 2023, 09:05:19 PM »
a zero for me for looking fat and lazy during games. It would have been a 1, but then his petulant antics refusing to answer the call brought it down to zero.

one more year then its a rookie spot from 2025.

Can’t say fat Frankie

Been established in the AFLW thread we should say overweight

Oh hang on .. this is the male side .. fat is fine here

Clearly a whack at me Damo, which is fine

And no, fat isn't fine in either

It’s a whack at PC Australia

Only in such a ridiculous world could the word fat be offensive and overweight be acceptable

The world as we knew it is fried

Why? Because you want to use the word fat?
I would say there’s hyper sensitivity both ways.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4044
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - Maurice Rioli Jnr
« Reply #21 on: September 13, 2023, 09:31:21 PM »
No
It’s because use of the word fat even warrants comment

How soft and ridiculous

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18495
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - Maurice Rioli Jnr
« Reply #22 on: September 14, 2023, 12:16:42 AM »
Fatty Boomsticks. :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.