Author Topic: Hands in the back rule  (Read 8423 times)

Offline DallasCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
  • roll on 2011
Re: Hands in the back rule
« Reply #75 on: November 29, 2007, 10:49:02 AM »
Adrian Anderson on the "hands in the back rule":

Research showed a significant majority of the 289 free kicks paid for hands-in-the-back clearly affected the outcome of marking contests.

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,22839458%255E19742,00.html

A significant majority?
I would say 100% of the free kicks affected the marking contest- ie: it was no longer a marking contest, it was a free.

The game is over administered both from Jolimont and on the ground....how would incidental contact confuse fans, nothing confused fans more than the interpretations we saw this year. Stop wrecking the game Anderson!
Experience is a good school. But the fees are high.
Heinrich Heine

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Hands in the back rule
« Reply #76 on: November 29, 2007, 01:41:09 PM »
The Laws Committee considered "at length" a modification of the hands-in-the-back rule

For goodness sake.  >:(

The overwhelming majority of fans hate the incidental contact being penalised.

'Hand's in the back' should simply be 'Push in the back'!!!!!!

Why is it so hard? :banghead :banghead :banghead

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40205
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Hands in the back rule
« Reply #77 on: November 29, 2007, 07:41:28 PM »

Why is it so hard? :banghead :banghead :banghead

Because Andy D's little mate Adrian

1/ has to justify his employment at the AFL
2/ it gives him an opportunity to talk to the media
3/ because they don't want to admit the stuffed it up
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58590
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Hands in the back rule
« Reply #78 on: November 30, 2007, 02:22:28 PM »
The Laws Committee considered "at length" a modification of the hands-in-the-back rule that would allow incidental contact, but felt it would make it impossible to umpire and would confuse fans.
As opposed to what the rule is currently where umps are guessing due to it being impossible to be in the right position most of the time and making most contests tosses of a coin ???  ::)
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd