PRE had a poll on whether the supporters wanted to retain Wallace
95/71 in favour of retaining Wallace last time I looked.
Signicant considering the crap year we're having after the lowest of the low last year.
Although there are many who want to see the back of Wallace, there's a lot who still want to retain him.
Hence why I think he should be given his full five years - people believe in what he's trying to do - is what they want as well - even if the execution of it on game day isn't up to par.
I expected to go back even further this season with more youngsters and olders seniors, so not surprised with how we're going.
But whether it's Wallace they want to keep or some kind of stability, I'm not sure. For me, it's all about stability and sticking to a plan to its finish.