Irrespective of whether the goal umpire was in front of or behind the line when the ball struck him, shouldn't the real issue be, given the trajectory of the ball, it would definitely have rolled through for a goal if he hadn't gotten in the way. Therefore, as the goal umpire is not a Fremantle player trying to block the shot, but an impartial observer paid solely to adjudicate on where each shot lands , shouldn't common sense prevail and the goal stand? Or am I naïve to think that common sense ever applies to any of the dribble which emanates from Jeff Gieschen's pie-hole.