2008 another false dawn where we finished 9th in a 16 team competition.
And I thought you didn't like mediocrity.
We had the 12th most miserly defence in 2008.
http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_ladder?year=2008&pt=SE&st=SE&sb=a
But if anyone wants to compare that with last year....
http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_ladder?year=2015&pt=SE&st=SE&sb=a
So let's recap, shall we?
I mention Thursfield's 2008 season, you're reply is to post a link to the stats for one match of said player from 2009.
I say Thursfield at his best was better defender than Chaplin , you respond by bringing up Rance & Grimes and saying that together with Chaplin they are better than Thursfield was together with the also hitherto unmentioned Moore & McGuane.
After I reiterate that Thursfield at his best was better than Chaplin but also back your -frankly irrelevant- assertion Rance & Grimes are better than Moore & McGuane, you respond by talking about Richmond's 9th placing in Thursfield's best year as if that was somehow down to Thursfield and equate it to me endorsing mediocrity...you then talk about where our entire defence ranked in Thursfield's best year as if again, it's somehow proof of his individual performance and despite me already conceding that at least two of Thursfield's team mates in defence that year were nowhere near as good as Chaplin's current team mates.
In sum - I think it's fair to say that you're really not very good at this as comprehension is clearly not your strong suit, and it's best you quit while you're behind.