Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Quote from: tdyen on September 07, 2009, 10:01:18 AMQuoteSmall Mids (5): Edwards (180), Tambling (180), White (179), Foley (177), King (174)Is this too big a group? Collingwood may have a similar number of small mids but I doubt many (if any) other sides would.Not necessarily too big a group (maybe one more than we need) but the quality to suit modern footy is lacking. When you're under six foot you need blistering pace and good or uncanny skills to have a long AFL career. From the above list Blingers fits that category. Foley had that pace in 2007/early 08 but we haven't seen those running and bouncing bursts out of stoppages since he's been carrying injuries. Edwards for mine is being played out of position despite some reasonable form. He's too small to be playing in defence long-term. IMO he needs to play as a small forward pushing up into the midfield (HFF/FP).
QuoteSmall Mids (5): Edwards (180), Tambling (180), White (179), Foley (177), King (174)Is this too big a group? Collingwood may have a similar number of small mids but I doubt many (if any) other sides would.
Small Mids (5): Edwards (180), Tambling (180), White (179), Foley (177), King (174)
Quote from: tdyen on September 05, 2009, 03:44:29 PMAges Round 1, 2010 (current number of games)35: Richo (282)31: Cousins (253)-----------------------------28: Tuck (110)27: Newman (154)26: King (41), Moore (65)25: -24: Foley (84)23: Jackson (69), Polo (52), Thomson (30), Thursfield (53), McGuane (54), Morton (50), Tambling (95)Woulld also be happy to moveon Tuck, Jackson or Moore if a good trade came up.
Ages Round 1, 2010 (current number of games)35: Richo (282)31: Cousins (253)-----------------------------28: Tuck (110)27: Newman (154)26: King (41), Moore (65)25: -24: Foley (84)23: Jackson (69), Polo (52), Thomson (30), Thursfield (53), McGuane (54), Morton (50), Tambling (95)
Patience. No use sacking people when you may be able to get something worthwhile for them. There's plenty of time. Apart from anything else, if we sack them all now we won't have anything to talk about later in the year.
There havent been enough sackings at Punt Rd for my liking. The axe needs to come out again, we need more sackings, more people need to end up at Centrelink
Schulz to. Dont forget Schulz. We need more sackings.
Quote from: Ramps on September 10, 2009, 11:29:50 AMSchulz to. Dont forget Schulz. We need more sackings. I get the feeling Schulz's 2010 contract will save him, ramps.
Quote from: tigersalive on September 10, 2009, 11:32:41 AMQuote from: Ramps on September 10, 2009, 11:29:50 AMSchulz to. Dont forget Schulz. We need more sackings. I get the feeling Schulz's 2010 contract will save him, ramps.He still remains my roughie for our top 10 players next year!